Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 76 18.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 166 39.8%

  • Total voters
    417
It looks like Aaron's lawyer is going to try and show the HRO violation. My understanding is he should have gone to a sheriff's office to report it and get a prosecutor on-board. I'm wonder why this has yet to be done. Maybe I'm missing something in the process.

I think Aaron takes the L against Nick because of the revenge porn case and timing offering up a good motive. Nick is so bad though, that his defence might be so shit that the Judge gives it. I've said before, if I'm Melton and Nick, before killing myself, I'd just cut all the times Aaron said this doesn't bother him, or words to that effect.

Melton v Aaron, I think Aaron's child gets the W. Aaron himself I'm not sure.

I'm pretty confident both Nick and Melton have violated their HROs. I'm not sure how that factors in.

A chance for Toe being that the Barneswalker performs like he did in the Frank's hearing. Also, the Judge might kinda bundle the cases together and end up giving Aaron the W based off Melton's child sex proclivities.

Another fascinating tidbit is just how Nick is going to handle that unauthorised access incident. Is he going to admit it and try to claim he had access but didn't actually access? Deny entirely? Seems a perjury risk. Admit it all and say so what I wasn't charged?

I'm wondering if the terms Aaron's lawyer sent were a mutual no contact. That would be a good play to get ahead of the "but he said this!".
 
Petition to allow multiple choice.

Screenshot_20250719-003811~2.webp


Oh you weren't even done yet. Another win for the Toe.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250719-003811.webp
    Screenshot_20250719-003811.webp
    134.7 KB · Views: 10
https://archive.ph/yvXJF GwHWiLtXkAAHKkC.webp
Dude took a selfie, reviewed it, and decided it was worth publishing across the entire internet. LOL.
This guy looks like a rapist.

I feel like that's gonna be the biggest gut punch on Wednesday: If the judge doesn't at least grant the portion of his HRO that applies to Aaron's kids.
Honestly I think it's a win if the HRO is upheld to protect Aaron's family. That's it. It doesn't necessarily have to include himself.
I'm just sick and tired of hearing from this gross paedophile and his dimwitted takes towards the other man's private family, which obviously includes his children. He should shut up about it.
Otherwise, I support the major W option because hopefully it'll be about just one twiggy lolcow again, not him and his legion of unfunny Redditors with their favourite fat paedophile.

Petition to allow multiple choice.

View attachment 7662900


Oh you weren't even done yet. Another win for the Toe.
It was submitted by accident. I fixed it.
 
My understanding is he should have gone to a sheriff's office to report it and get a prosecutor on-board. I'm wonder why this has yet to be done. Maybe I'm missing something in the process.
Good post. It outlined all the complexities with the HRO palooza.

As for Aaron's non-reporting of each incident, here's what I think happened based on his words and reading between the lines:

He reported the hacking - he was very open about doing so. He said Stearns LEO took it seriously. As you said, that likely improves his chances with his HRO case against both Nick and Melton.

My impression is that his lawyer (then Todd Peterson) told him to start documenting everything. I believe Aaron joined the Farms shortly after that (I need to fact-check that). I have to believe he's still here lurking.

My point: he was documenting but not reporting because he hadn't filed the HRO (bad move). We know from Nick and Aaron that MN LEO asks HRO "victims" to report everything in a timely manner. So, he has all the evidence but not the offical reports. Since filing the HRO, we know he very publicly said that he'd be reporting Melton's stream sniping.

Onto court...

What's frustrating about all of this is that it will be a rare battle of legal prowess, and I have no confidence in either lawyer.

If Aaron's lawyer can concisely and clearly outline the disproportionate amount of harassment Aaron has received, Aaron wins. (Side note, I disagree with those who say he should state they were gay lovers. I think he should say Nick WANTED to fuck him and he always declined. This would explain Nick's animosity and it keeps Aaron's hetero rep - jokes aside - in tact.)

If White can effectively muddy the waters by saying Aaron participated in the same harassing activity (calling Melton a pedo, KC appearance, making a video for Hackamana ffs) Nick and/or Melton wins.
 
My hopes of a total toe victory has gone up slightly. Just slightly. Court is hard to predict unless you know all the details, including the judge and his/her state of mind. Best to have no expectations, only guesses.
I'm glad I'll get to watch the hearing, it'll be some nice entertainment in the afternoon.
 
Good post. It outlined all the complexities with the HRO palooza.

As for Aaron's non-reporting of each incident, here's what I think happened based on his words and reading between the lines:

He reported the hacking - he was very open about doing so. He said Stearns LEO took it seriously. As you said, that likely improves his chances with his HRO case against both Nick and Melton.

My impression is that his lawyer (then Todd Peterson) told him to start documenting everything. I believe Aaron joined the Farms shortly after that (I need to fact-check that). I have to believe he's still here lurking.

My point: he was documenting but not reporting because he hadn't filed the HRO (bad move). We know from Nick and Aaron that MN LEO asks HRO "victims" to report everything in a timely manner. So, he has all the evidence but not the offical reports. Since filing the HRO, we know he very publicly said that he'd be reporting Melton's stream sniping.

Onto court...

What's frustrating about all of this is that it will be a rare battle of legal prowess, and I have no confidence in either lawyer.

If Aaron's lawyer can concisely and clearly outline the disproportionate amount of harassment Aaron has received, Aaron wins. (Side note, I disagree with those who say he should state they were gay lovers. I think he should say Nick WANTED to fuck him and he always declined. This would explain Nick's animosity and it keeps Aaron's hetero rep - jokes aside - in tact.)

If White can effectively muddy the waters by saying Aaron participated in the same harassing activity (calling Melton a pedo, KC appearance, making a video for Hackamana ffs) Nick and/or Melton wins.
Aaron is two things dumb and a wannabe shock jock. I think he doesn't like Melton, but thought that talking shit at each other at 1500 miles away was enough of a buffer zone. It was content for the show. Nick changed the equation. The pedo now has easy access to Aaron's life. Nick also has some delusion that ruining Aaron's life will somehow redeem him. This is a recipe for disaster. I find it amusing as all hell, but I would be remiss if I did not mention that all parties need to stop before it gets worse for all involved.
 
If White can effectively muddy the waters by saying Aaron participated in the same harassing activity (calling Melton a pedo, KC appearance, making a video for Hackamana ffs) Nick and/or Melton wins.
Everything I researched said the "He started it!" defense doesn't work. At best it inclines a Judge to rule mutual no contact.

I agree with @Potentially Criminal. I think the fact that Aaron is the defendant in a revenge porn case against Nick's wife means he has a really huge hurdle to overcome. The timing of it is also super dubious. There is no question that Nick's conduct is harassing, but I think that's probably not enough in this case. Still, Nick tries hard to get the L.

I'm fairly sure Nick and Melton both violated their HROs. Minnesota case law seems super clear on it. My understanding is that Aaron and his lawyer need to go to the Sheriff's office and report it. The cop then needs to be convinced and then a prosecutor needs to file charges. This is what I'm questioning. Maybe I've misunderstood the process and Aaron gets to litigate this at the HRO hearing. Or maybe it is coming and they intentionally left it late to see how many violations they could get. Dunno.

The funniest outcome is the Judge decides nobody can talk about each other and then we get to see who fucks up first. We are dealing with olympic level of retardation with all of them.
 
And telling him how to do leg lifts. From the most scrawny man ever.
Damn Kurt, 5plate leg press is actually impressive, I'm mirin' broski
This is the physicality of Nick Rekieta, telling Kurt how to lift heavy weights.
It wouldn't surprise me if Nick falls into the mindset of most retards, narcissists, and women; that being, now before I go here, I'm in no way saying Kurt isn't fat, but a lot people don't understand the difference between body building and strong man / power lifting. Also pretty sure the only time Nick went to a gym was to hang out in the locker room and ask other men if steiroids can be passed through semen.
 
It looks like Aaron's lawyer is going to try and show the HRO violation. My understanding is he should have gone to a sheriff's office to report it and get a prosecutor on-board. I'm wonder why this has yet to be done. Maybe I'm missing something in the process.

I think Aaron takes the L against Nick because of the revenge porn case and timing offering up a good motive. Nick is so bad though, that his defence might be so shit that the Judge gives it. I've said before, if I'm Melton and Nick, before killing myself, I'd just cut all the times Aaron said this doesn't bother him, or words to that effect.

Melton v Aaron, I think Aaron's child gets the W. Aaron himself I'm not sure.

I'm pretty confident both Nick and Melton have violated their HROs. I'm not sure how that factors in.

A chance for Toe being that the Barneswalker performs like he did in the Frank's hearing. Also, the Judge might kinda bundle the cases together and end up giving Aaron the W based off Melton's child sex proclivities.

Another fascinating tidbit is just how Nick is going to handle that unauthorised access incident. Is he going to admit it and try to claim he had access but didn't actually access? Deny entirely? Seems a perjury risk. Admit it all and say so what I wasn't charged?

I'm wondering if the terms Aaron's lawyer sent were a mutual no contact. That would be a good play to get ahead of the "but he said this!".
If its preponderance of the evidence...

I dont see how Rekieta or Melton, win.
 
Because Aaron has repeatedly said he doesn't get stressed about it and he filed the day after being found to have broken his release conditions. So it calls into question the motive behind it. It's a messy case.
Maybe with Aaron's original plea deal ruined he fights the "revenge" "porn" case anyway in which case it's Anything Can Happen Day.
 
I find it amusing as all hell, but I would be remiss if I did not mention that all parties need to stop before it gets worse for all involved.
Nick can't stop.
An HRO won't stop him either.
Heck, I'm not entirely sure even jail would stop him trying to mess with Aaron's life.

Because Aaron has repeatedly said he doesn't get stressed about it and he filed the day after being found to have broken his release conditions. So it calls into question the motive behind it. It's a messy case.
At least he has the opportunity to say he didn't take it seriously until the stalking by going to the gym/Stoney's and the gloat stream plus other things that were said afterwards. That they made it clear it was a real thing for them, not just entertainment.
 
Last edited:
I think Nick is in the third camp: "Nothing wrong happened on the island, it was just funny and weird, I wish I was invited."
I was about to type that. Honestly Epstein's island sounds like a libertarian paradise

I'm going to save you hours of wasted time:
Ethan Ralph: "Aaron is a snitch faggot cunt [whatever other derogatory term]"
Pretty Anti-Diet Podcast: "Yeah, hmm, yeah, totally!"

Repeat ad-nauseum.
Three pigs in a pool of mud.

Should I call off work for this shit? I shouldn’t. I shouldn’t. No. I must be a responsible adult and not use my paid time off for this.
It's up to you. What you shouldn't do is blog post about it.
 
View attachment 7663410
[ X / Archive ]
Yet another indirect contact violation via Twitter tagging.

I really can't understand with this X tagging, is he stupid and does that because he doesn't notice it happening or is he playing smug doing that intentionally because he knows he pings Aaron constantly?

I mean he's definitely stupid but I don't know why he does it. Maybe he's now addicted to toeing the line to legal woes because he can't feel nothing anymore.
 
Back