US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a clear cut understanding of Christianity, the interpretation Null has of it regarding the soul is just one I've never heard before or had forgotten about after a few years.
like 99% of religions, with the internal or external death and then rising, always 3 days w all the people/myths: all of it is different flavors around the world for thousands and thousands of years, centered around the basic understanding of the winter solstice. the bible’s a good example of parable, allegory, mysticism, metaphor, which is easily used for power control gain ect. hence, our wars and finger pointing.
 
Side not that number in the thing is 1 with a hundred zeros. So for comparison is you took every animals and human that has ever lived it would not be half of that.
Google's AI says that 10^100 shrimp would occupy more volume than the known universe.
 
Dunning Kruger in action. No need to actually study the religion when /pol/ and WordPress website just program you with what they "know'. Apparently thousands of years of internally consistent debate are all made up and it's a collective secret
The internal debate being impenetrable to outsiders is a point of pride that you yourself have even leveraged so why should anybody take your word for it? There's 3000 pages in the Talmud and two dozen books of the zohar for you to refer to.

If the only words you have are the words of an eight year old getting caught with his hand in the cookie jar then you shouldn't be surprised the only people who swallow this confoundingly narcissistic bullshit are geriatrics getting babysat by conservative talk radio
 
Harry Sissy went on the Adam Friedland Show a few days ago, got embarrassed hard and worse than the gay sex he participates in every day. Another reason dems won't win back (white) men for a good while. The guy just has no capability to laugh or actually be a man, you can see him trying to avoid being "complicit" in any jokes that might make the pooner dyke aboriginal say something to him.

KWE257.webp



KWE258.webp




top comment nails it:
KWE260.webp


Also :story:
KWE259.webp
 
The internal debate being impenetrable to outsiders is a point of pride that you yourself have even leveraged so why should anybody take your word for it? There's 3000 pages in the Talmud and two dozen books of the zohar for you to refer to.

If the only words you have are the words of an eight year old getting caught with his hand in the cookie jar then you shouldn't be surprised the only people who swallow this confoundingly narcissistic bullshit are geriatrics getting babysat by conservative talk radio
Again, dunning Kruger in action. You're saying there's nothing staking Jewish beliefs to the ground, I challenge that saying you should try to research the religion before making stupid claims. You then cry about how impenetrable the religion is and how you can't possibly study it. You end up in a position where you're not only admitting that your original claim was dumb, you also admit that you're too dumb to study a religion that's been extensively studied by outsiders.

Like JFC at some point even the stupidest person would probably realize that Jews don't all "make it up on the spot" when there's so much material to draw on.
 
well you seem intelligent enough and I'd assume you know a fair bit about Christianity
I'm not going to comment on something that's not my religion. As you can see by this idiot here:

You're asking someone for an opinion who is only capable of relativistic posturing, he literally isn't going to understand the question

Commenting on others religion from a perceived sense of education without anything to back it up only exposes how ignorant you really are.
 
Again, dunning Kruger in action. You're saying there's nothing staking Jewish beliefs to the ground, I challenge that saying you should try to research the religion before making stupid claims. You then cry about how impenetrable the religion is and how you can't possibly study it. You end up in a position where you're not only admitting that your original claim was dumb, you also admit that you're too dumb to study a religion that's been extensively studied by outsiders.
Why would anybody take what you have to say at face value when you've admitted to lying about it? It doesn't matter if you're actually telling the truth, you burned that bridge a long time ago.
 
The "why do bad things happen to good people" debate on the KF political thread is indeed funny. I can only add that it's probably got to do with the '6 year old doesn't understand why they're spanked for running into a road and not looking' level, but there are indeed cases of suffering so severe and uncalled for that it's hard to explain away. The "it'll build character in this life or the next" isn't a strong argument to me, but whatever.

I used to believe in karma in general somewhat, but being on this site and just irl you do see that some people can get away with anything and some get BTFO over next to nothing all the time, but again it's one of those 'mysteries of the universe' that'll always be debated.
 
Why would anybody take what you have to say at face value when you've admitted to lying about it
Point to where I "admitted to lying about it". Try being a little self aware and reading your own posts then thinking through them a little. Arguing that we just "make stuff up" and that we have no concrete rules is genuinely retard tier when the entire religion is based off studying concrete rules autistically.
 

Hypothesis: Donboi has always been controlled opposition.

  • Prediction One: Clinton will not be locked up and he will pivot immediately.
  • Outcome: Donboi pivoted immediately and didn't lock her up.
  • Prediction One confirmed.

  • Prediction Two: None of the legal proceedings against Donboi will go anywhere.
  • Outcome: none of the legal proceedings against Donboi went anywhere.
  • Prediction Two confirmed.

  • Prediction Three: Nothing will happen to Big O despite the theatrics.
  • Outcome: ????
Anyone want to take a guess on the outcome of three?
 
Point to where I "admitted to lying about it". Try being a little self aware and reading your own posts then thinking through them a little. Arguing that we just "make stuff up" and that we have no concrete rules is genuinely retard tier when the entire religion is based off studying concrete rules autistically.
when you break them constantly for low tier rhetorical points it really undermines whatever point you're trying to make about how serious this is
 
Why would anybody take what you have to say at face value when you've admitted to lying about it? It doesn't matter if you're actually telling the truth, you burned that bridge a long time ago.
Bro, you're replying to the shared JIDF forum sliding account. The people that use it are paid by the post to defend Israel.
 
Back