US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What would that even look like? A magical world where no one wants to sin? A world where sin isn't bad? Like murdering someone is good? Does the raped person like it?
I'm not sure because it would be a world where our logic likely wouldn't be applicable.
Then it wouldn't be free will.
He can make it be that way, he is the origin of all things following the Christian interpretation. He was the one to have made the logic that determines sin to be an inherent part of free will and therefore he can make it no longer a part of free will or better yet not exist at all.
 
If God is all powerful (capable of doing anything) then He would be able to make it such that free will does not require sin.
I mean it seems fairly clear that even if there are no problems or sin to begin with humanity would still fuck themselves over and create them. Sin is the defiance of Gods will, and having free will inherently gives you the ability to defy him. That's what makes it FREE will.

Even in the perfect sinless existence of the Garden of Eden, man and woman still both chose to shoot themselves in the foot against Gods direct warnings simply because they wanted to.

Free will without choices or consequences, and thus sin, wouldn't be free will. You'd just sit in the garden for all eternity and be mildy happy, but you would never become closer to God. You never chose to do good or reject the temptation of evil or be content with embracing God because you never had the option not to. You'd just be a puppet, which defeats the entire point of creating something in your own image I.E. with it's own separate will.
 
Giving us another example of low iq bad faith debate? That's not the comment in question. And still not a burgerable offense.

Anything else, libtard?
I mean, that was you responding to a request for a page number to back up one of your arguments since your source didn't say what you claimed it did. If you want to claim that's a low IQ, bad faith debate, knock yourself out. You then flounced off after being mad someone would question you, because I guess that's bad faith.
 
Look we can squabble over bullshit gotcha things to ‘own the theists’ like ‘well can God make a rock so big he can’t lift?’ But they made a whole separate thread for that in Mass Debates we should probably be good Redditors and take it there
 
I mean, that was you responding to a request for a page number to back up one of your arguments since your source didn't say what you claimed it did. If you want to claim that's a low IQ, bad faith debate, knock yourself out. You then flounced off after being mad someone would question you, because I guess that's bad faith.

More low iq bad faith arguing.

You were told you knew nothing about the topic even tho you tried to claim you did. You asked for something to start getting a clue. I gave you a starting place, a book you didn't know existed, which is hilarious given the topic. You were told it was a starting place.

You pulled your page number demand out of your ass to try to claw back from your loss.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lawltism2
someone sound the @Fatpacks alarm. support for Trump among people that never, ever vote has plummeted. he's surely "cooked", as the zoomers, say this time
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 7675087
That’s interesting because there was a Reddit thread about how zoomers and younger won’t answer the phone with a hello but wait for the caller to speak to avoid robocalls and people cloning their voices. I know polling is more than just phone banks now but I wonder how avoidant that age range is to any unsolicited contact out of paranoia and awkwardness.
 
Since you insist on repeating the same old tired bullshit I will respond only through Grok from now on

Alright, let’s get into it. Imagine someone who can’t stop trashing President Trump, spewing negativity like it’s their full-time job. Here’s a sharp, no-nonsense takedown:

You know, it’s almost impressive how you’ve turned whining about Trump into an Olympic sport. Every time you open your mouth, it’s the same tired script—griping, moaning, and clutching pearls like you’re auditioning for a soap opera. What’s the deal? Did he personally steal your lunch money or something? Because the obsession is getting old. You act like you’ve got some profound insight, but all you’re doing is parroting the same lazy talking points everyone’s heard a thousand times. No nuance, no substance—just a broken record of complaints.

Here’s the kicker: you don’t even try to engage with what he’s done or why people might support him. Policies? Results? Nah, too much effort. You’d rather sling insults and call it a personality. Meanwhile, Trump’s out there living rent-free in your head, 24/7. Maybe take a breather, look at the bigger picture, and ask yourself why you’re so fixated on hating one guy instead of, I don’t know, coming up with something constructive? It’s not just boring—it’s embarrassing. Step up or pipe down.

The best use case of AI I've seen so far - countering doomers and demoralizers.
 
Back