Official Kiwifarms Faggot-Hate thread

Most people tolerate faggotry because of the extremely successful media push to clean up fags.

And that is exactly why victory was the worst thing to ever happen to the gay rights movement. Once they won, once the powers that be started to simp for them (or even pretended to), they no longer had their "underdog" facade to hide behind.

Especially because it was via brute force via the courts, first in California in the late aughts, then again federally in 2015, not via anything even remotely resembling democracy. Since then, the gays were no longer "oppressed," no matter how much they pretended otherwise. Whatever stranglehold on the discourse they gained during the 1990s-2010s has been lost in the years since then.

Only by making homosexuality mainstream and normalized could we finally get to the point where we can judge the whole thing on its own merits: just because it's considered "normal" now doesn't make it any less repulsive and disgusting, and all the negative traits about homosexuality that were pointed out in numerous studies back then (coming out of the closet at earlier and earlier ages results in higher suicide rates, homosexuality is highly co-morbid with antisocial behavior and even worse paraphilias, high SDI infection rate, over-representation amongst sex offenders, significant reduction in quality of life that cannot possibly be explained by external forces like societal homophobia, etc) or even casual observation (compulsive need to groom children, social contagion, etc) still hold true even decades later.

It's also becoming plainer that the gay rights movement opened up the floodgates for the normalization of other unhealthy lifestyles (not even just sexual lifestyles or transgenderism, also including things like gluttony in the form of the "body positivity" movement), because it was the gay rights movement that pushed the meme that people are "born that way" and therefore moral agency is a myth and we can't expect people to be better and rise above their base instincts.

The whole thing has also thoroughly destroyed the shitlib and lolbertarian argument of "But how does it affect you personally? Just let people do what they want!" It's proven to us, the hard way, that we absolutely have a good reason to care about the moral and spiritual health of society, and why we are perfectly justified in "legislating morality." We have every reason to care, because these people insist on shitting where everyone else eats, and we have the right to crack down on that shit, as brutally as we have to.

Tolerance for the gays hinged on them not shitting all over the place and them being true to their word that it wouldn't affect the rest of us. It took half a decade for them to break that promise. It took a very short time from 2015 for that social experiment to fail miserably and prove to the rest of us why human society throughout the ages refused to recognize gay "marriage" or any concept of "gay rights."
 
Last edited:
I can’t reply to your post, but I was just thinking. Why do they talk about “DL” men, and about homewrecking opposite sex couples like it’s a fun pastime to them?

And why do they talk about it being “totally healthy and normal” to explore one’s sexuality unless it leads one to conclude they’re indeed a heterosexual? Maybe it’s a self-answering question, but for lack of better word they seem to get off on conversion toward anything not-heterosexual, but don’t entertain the possibility that anyone could, or would want to work out what got them toward sodomy and move into heterosexuality(normality). Maybe they resent normal people for the sake of it.
 
I can’t reply to your post, but I was just thinking. Why do they talk about “DL” men, and about homewrecking opposite sex couples like it’s a fun pastime to them?

And why do they talk about it being “totally healthy and normal” to explore one’s sexuality unless it leads one to conclude they’re indeed a heterosexual? Maybe it’s a self-answering question, but for lack of better word they seem to get off on conversion toward anything not-heterosexual, but don’t entertain the possibility that anyone could, or would want to work out what got them toward sodomy and move into heterosexuality(normality). Maybe they resent normal people for the sake of it.

You can highlight specific parts of a post that are "unquotable" and an option will pop up to either "quote" or "reply". I think it's done in order to prevent posts from becoming huge, impenetrable walls of text.
 
I can’t reply to your post, but I was just thinking. Why do they talk about “DL” men, and about homewrecking opposite sex couples like it’s a fun pastime to them?

And why do they talk about it being “totally healthy and normal” to explore one’s sexuality unless it leads one to conclude they’re indeed a heterosexual? Maybe it’s a self-answering question, but for lack of better word they seem to get off on conversion toward anything not-heterosexual, but don’t entertain the possibility that anyone could, or would want to work out what got them toward sodomy and move into heterosexuality(normality). Maybe they resent normal people for the sake of it.
Now the gay propaganda and focus on children makes sense, doesn't it?
 
I listened to a podcast recently where a guy said that in societies where homosexuality isn’t “normalized”, straight(normal) people are able to be more open/affectionate with friends/loved ones of the same sex, to the point that westerners often think they’re gay or something.

Is it a matter of normal heterosexual things not being gayified by things that sodomites do? It kind of brings to mind the way yuri/yaoi-tards will try to kweer up any people (real or not) who so much as breathe the same air as a same-sex person.
 
I listened to a podcast recently where a guy said that in societies where homosexuality isn’t “normalized”, straight(normal) people are able to be more open/affectionate with friends/loved ones of the same sex, to the point that westerners often think they’re gay or something.

Is it a matter of normal heterosexual things not being gayified by things that sodomites do? It kind of brings to mind the way yuri/yaoi-tards will try to kweer up any people (real or not) who so much as breathe the same air as a same-sex person.
Fags are why the no homo meme exists, which is only half sarcastic.
 
Most people tolerate faggotry because of the extremely successful media push to clean up fags.
It's important to remember then back in the 60s up to 80s everyone understood what the whole movement was about and fags were pretty open about all the drugs, orgies, child prostitution, groups like NAMBLA, places for hooking up like movie theaters with gay porn etc. The only reason why they scored any victory at all is because they decided to hide those things for pragmatic reasons and TV started portraying them as basically the same all-american, white fence, friendly family from the neighboorhood with the only difference being that there are two dudes instead of a dude and a girl.
 
It's important to remember then back in the 60s up to 80s everyone understood what the whole movement was about and fags were pretty open about all the drugs, orgies, child prostitution, groups like NAMBLA, places for hooking up like movie theaters with gay porn etc. The only reason why they scored any victory at all is because they decided to hide those things for pragmatic reasons and TV started portraying them as basically the same all-american, white fence, friendly family from the neighboorhood with the only difference being that there are two dudes instead of a dude and a girl.

Tho attempts to rehabilitate the gay community's image as such does date back pretty darn early.

 
Tho attempts to rehabilitate the gay community's image as such does date back pretty darn early.

True but this is just one random and I think pretty obscure documentary. I meant it in a sense of really hitting mainstream audiences for example movies like Philadelphia (1993) or having a gay character portrayed in a purely positive light on some very popular tv show etc.


By the way this also reminds me how even a word 'gay' is propaganda. Gay used to mean basically 'very happy' and they intentionally started using this word to describe themselves to show how happy they are when 'being themselves' and 'living their lifestyle'
 
Media depictions of faggotry was pretty accurate up until the early 90s. The first attempt to turn it around was the 1993 flick Philadelphia, which was heavily promoted, featured an all star cast, and even got Bruce Springsteen to make a new song for it, to lock in the boomers. Then some degenerate genius came up with the idea to market gays as pets for white women, which kicked it into overdrive with Will and Grace. The rest is history. Before this big push, they were portrayed as junkies and deviants.
 
The first attempt to turn it around was the 1993 flick Philadelphia
What's even more interesting is that they tried to spin the whole aids thing into part of the narrative about how gays are innocent victims of society.
Like yea you are constantly being told with natural law, religion, common sense and dozen other things that whatever you were doing is bad morally, physically and mentally. Then suddenly there is a deadly disease that kills you if you keep doing the thing you weren't supposed to be doing and somehow it's everyone else's fault and not yours ?
 
Then suddenly there is a deadly disease that kills you if you keep doing the thing you weren't supposed to be doing and somehow it's everyone else's fault and not yours ?

It absolutely drives me nuts and makes me MATI that gays got away with it, using the GRIDS pandemic as an opportunity to fish for sympathy. Even though anyone with half a brain SHOULD realize that HIV is the easiest bug to not pick up, all you gotta do is not engage in degenerate behavior. The only possible exceptions are those who got it from being raped, those who were unlucky enough to receive a blood transfusion from an HIV positive person, or wives who picked it up from their closeted fag husbands.
 
By the way this also reminds me how even a word 'gay' is propaganda. Gay used to mean basically 'very happy' and they intentionally started using this word to describe themselves to show how happy they are when 'being themselves' and 'living their lifestyle'
This is more important than it sounds. Liberals wins are stolen through manipulation and language control like this, controlling perception and narratives. Their propaganda is strong and effective that even a lot of haters of faggotry have unknowingly fallen for and inadvertently spread some of it.

The only possible exceptions are those who got it from being raped, those who were unlucky enough to receive a blood transfusion from an HIV positive person, or wives who picked it up from their closeted fag husbands.
And rare cases of weaponized AIDS, like that one dentist who purposefully gave it to a girl, or people who get into fights with faggots.
 
Fag couple crowdfund purchase of baby son from surrogate. Naturally people are becoming increasingly skeptical and disgusted of such arrangements and as such expressed concern for the baby. A tweet in response saying something along the lines of’ ‘shut up bigoted homophobe they’re good dads” gets 200000+ likes.

Beautiful story, except just over 24 hours later, one of the dads is exposed as a literal convicted pedo. It seems the bigots and homophobes were actually right this time, and that poor child was stolen from his mother straight into the arms of a sex offender. It seems the fag was able to procure the child due to the gestational surrogacy legislation loopholes in PA. Who knows what horrors the boy would have suffered had the bigots not spoken up and this wasn’t revealed sooner.

IMG_6265.webp
 
Fag couple crowdfund purchase of baby son from surrogate.
Truth be told even if it wasn't a pedophile it's still really immoral the more you think about it.
Turning a child into a commodity you can buy, pick and choose (or throw out). You take away child from his actual family and give it to someone else for money. You are taking away the normal family process and replacing it with something artificial. We could go on about this.
 
I listened to a podcast recently where a guy said that in societies where homosexuality isn’t “normalized”, straight(normal) people are able to be more open/affectionate with friends/loved ones of the same sex, to the point that westerners often think they’re gay or something.

Is it a matter of normal heterosexual things not being gayified by things that sodomites do? It kind of brings to mind the way yuri/yaoi-tards will try to kweer up any people (real or not) who so much as breathe the same air as a same-sex person.
We in the West have basically been raised in the equivalent of an incestuous household since the late nineteenth-century invention of the category of the homosexual.

Dad might not be diddling you directly, but you're still gonna have a warped view of basic human connections.
 
Fag couple crowdfund purchase of baby son from surrogate. Naturally people are becoming increasingly skeptical and disgusted of such arrangements and as such expressed concern for the baby. A tweet in response saying something along the lines of’ ‘shut up bigoted homophobe they’re good dads” gets 200000+ likes.

Beautiful story, except just over 24 hours later, one of the dads is exposed as a literal convicted pedo. It seems the bigots and homophobes were actually right this time, and that poor child was stolen from his mother straight into the arms of a sex offender. It seems the fag was able to procure the child due to the gestational surrogacy legislation loopholes in PA. Who knows what horrors the boy would have suffered had the bigots not spoken up and this wasn’t revealed sooner.

View attachment 7705846
Anyone who doesn't see faggots adopting males as the reddest of red flags is either stupid enough to be institutionalized or evil enough to imprison.
 
Back