Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

I'm not a pedo defender but the rhetoric you and the rest of this thread are spreading is dangerous and untrue. The fact you failed to answer my question does also help my case since you know i'm right.
I refused to answer your question because the premise is retarded. You might as well have asked "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
 
I refused to answer your question because the premise is retarded. You might as well have asked "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
The man you are replying to is associated with 764 btw

i'm a bit late but just to clarify for you and the rest of the farms' sake, brad wasn't a satanist or into o9a or any of that, it was purely for aesthetics. angel however was seriously invested into o9a and had contact with some certain people but he didn't get far into his path.
 
I'm not a pedo defender but the rhetoric you and the rest of this thread are spreading is dangerous and untrue. The fact you failed to answer my question does also help my case since you know i'm right.
Arguing with you would be fruitless. The only value left to be extracted from you is whatever public information can be stripped from you like skinning a carcass.
 
Well.. not necessarily, it's important that there is exact boundaries on such a sensitive topic so that people are aware and educated on what actually makes someone a pedophile vs not making someone a pedophile
Nigga a pedophile is a pedophile. Don't get it twisted. If you crank it to kids, in ANY FORM, that makes you a fucking pedophile deserving of 30-06 to the cranium
 
Well.. not necessarily, it's important that there is exact boundaries on such a sensitive topic so that people are aware and educated on what actually makes someone a pedophile vs not making someone a pedophile
If you have to even ask whether somebody is a pedophile, then it's likely they are. If you want a line, the line is whichever makes it so people don't question you on your attraction.
 
i had a girlfriend
1754008224113.gif
 
Ok so if someone is like 20 and fucks a 16 year old would that make them a pedo even though both of them are basically biological adults..?
If you have to even ask this, then yes.
Nigga anyone who is attracted to petite features could be called a pedophile whether its a cute face or a small body etc etc even though those don't even make someone a pedo.
Pedos always claim they're just attracted to "petite" features like a "small body" yet suspiciously they're never attracted to what looks like actual adults. I told you this is a typical pedophile negotiating tactic.
RIP BOZO
 
Well.. not necessarily, it's important that there is exact boundaries on such a sensitive topic so that people are aware and educated on what actually makes someone a pedophile vs not making someone a pedophile
There are no "exact boundaries" like this in the real world. You are an autistic pedophile who is coping with the idea there is some perfect line to draw where you are on the opposite side of pedophiles. There are multiple arrests recorded in this thread of people who had CP & lolicon in their possession.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
Been out of the thread for over a month, and the hundred-page jump in that timeframe is making my head spin. And so while I'm trying to play catch up, I've noticed no one has yet brought up Kaoru Watashiya, a.k.a. the creator of Kodomo no Jikan.
1754005640911.webp
People are rightfully skeeved out by the series, though I've seen some people try to soften the blow by saying that because it's written by a woman, apparently there's more to it than meets the eye, that there's an actual story to tell when it comes to stuff like child abuse and the psychological damage it does to them. You just have to get through all of the lolicon ecchi to get to it, however, but when a literal-ten-year-old is showing off some lingerie she had managed to find because she knows her teacher (whom she's been teasing since day one) is going to end up walking in as she's changing and then getting all flustered, you have to ask yourself "Is there an actual story to tell?" The prototype one-shot involved the girls literally blackmailing the principal or vice principal with gravure of themselves (I don't remember the reason why, think he was always a nonce?), and one of the girls is shown to have self-inflicted scarring because of something in her home life, but no idea if that actually carries into the final product.

Something tells me Kaoru may be an actual lolicon, though, if not totally okay with the concept and pandering because she's done lolicon stories before and after Jikan. You can look up her list of manga, like yeah, not all of it is lolicon-centered, however, there's still an uncomfortable number of lolicon titles (adjacent or otherwise) that she's done that I'm honestly unsure if I should really fully trust that she was telling a serious story. I don't think it helps that on her Twitter (I have no idea if there's any porn for those who're going to go skim it), she still posts artwork of the main girl, Rin. Like I get it, the character is cute and all that when she's not being flirty, but it's not helping matters that Jikan is her most famous work and that she still references it. If it was a story about child abuse, why would she still make artwork of this one character to this day?

2025-07-31 17.04.54 m.media-amazon.com f5cf4d2d9695.webp
For the record, this big-titty teacher is present in the story and has her share of fanservicey moments, and there is some adult female nudity (early on, you see Rin's mom banging her high school-aged cousin (I didn't stutter) before she dies of cancer), but it doesn't balance out the uncomfortable lolicon shit to be able to ignore it. You will still feel the ick in trying to focus on the teacher as brain bleach.

I've been debating on whether-or-not I should take the bullet and be able to confirm for myself if there's actual depth to the manga as claimed (after all, the manga did once get greenlit to be localized out here before Zac Bertschy took up arms). I did it with the Loveless anime (doubt I'll touch the manga tbh), I was tackling If My Wife Became an Elementary School Student to prove that it's not lolicon at all (still haven't finished because I know it'll rip my heart in two; it's still not lolicon), and I did an episode-by-episode summary of Higurashi Shitsugou against my better judgment and sanity that I can be the sacrifice if I have to.
 
Ok so if someone is like 20 and fucks a 16 year old would that make them a pedo even though both of them are basically biological adults..?
18 is adult hood. Yes age of consent varies, I'm nipping that in the bud before you shit it at me. You said adult hood. That is 18. 16 is still a kid. And if you want to do the half your age +7 rule autism, 17 would be the minimum. Which is still a kid and you shouldn't stick your dick into, but that's the math. Fuck off.
Nigga anyone who is attracted to petite features could be called a pedophile whether its a cute face or a small body etc etc even though those don't even make someone a pedo.
For you I'm just gonna say YES
 
Back