US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In order for a piece of media to be good and age well for years to come is that it has to escape the politics of the decade it was made in, example robocop. That film has several jabs to politics of its time and yet still remains a great film years later because the story is not beholden to its politics and the central theme of the story (a man struggling with his identity after his rebirth) is a timeless theme. This is why so many modern films and such suck because they only will be relevant for a few years because their story and themes are beholden to their politics
Nothing today transgresses. This shouldn’t be taken as a blackpill.
 
Last edited:
I bet it sounded like a good idea to launch a children's fitness initiative to help change the subject away from that nasty Epstein business.
Not everything is a distraction, RFK said he'd get Trump to reinstate this. They do need a different spokesperson but let's be honest, reinstating this is a good thing considering the obesity epidemic.
 
That nigger couldn't even NAME TV show on PBS. Guarantee that bitch will say Sesame Street without knowing HBO owns it. The only good shows on PBS were Rick Bayless and Ming Tsai's cooking shows. With Youtube now taking the job of PBS, I can just watch them there.
Nova was good for a very long time. I've complained about it before, but that show fell off hard about 10 years ago when it was 6 global warming shows for every history or real science one. And yeah they're on Youtube now too.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
War in Ukraine would've been long over
Yes.
and instead you would have American soldiers getting killed in combat over the Baltics
Annnnd this is where you went full retard.

I’m saying involvement with Ukraine was and is a disastrously stupid idea, and that funding the war arising from Obama’s fucktardery simply prolongs the death, destruction and misery.

Your hot take is that the US and allies either had to fund the war, or put boots on the ground. For the record, no. This is a textbook example of the ‘black or white’ fallacy.

The third and best option for the US, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, Austria, North Korea, India, Australia and every other nation that has committed resources or their blood to this unnecessarily prolonged war is that they simply never got involved to begin with.

Short of going back in time and shooting Obama, Hillary and Nuland before they could arrange the ‘Maidan protests’ and install Yatsenyuk, the next best solution now is to let Russia finally finish it and move on to the diplomatic and reconstruction phase.
 
Last edited:
These figures regarding the casualties are blatantly obvious lies
Crowing about a 4:1 K/D ratio when the two sides have something like a 20:1 population ratio is fucking retarded.

This war is being decided on money and resources alone and the globalist cunts sponsoring the war know it. They know manpower alone will almost certainly give Russia the victory. So their decision to fund the Ukraine’s defense must be read as taking into account the deaths of as many Russians and Ukrainians as possible, until the war ends.

From this supposition we must ask ourselves: who would want as many Eastern Europeans and Slavs dead as possible, and why? Is there a particular group of people whose genetics originate from there, who converted to a different religion in the Middle Ages, who relocated to the West and the Middle East, who believe in their divine right to occupy land, and who might want the Ukraine ethnically cleansed so they can repopulate it?

Interesting questions indeed.

Can a Republican tell me what's genuinely good about PBS being defunded? GENUINELY. I am asking sincerely. What is the net positive for you?
Not being forced to pay taxes that fund my political enemies’ propaganda campaigns against me and my people? That’s a pretty big one. No taxation for misrepresentation.
 
Last edited:
That nigger couldn't even NAME TV show on PBS. Guarantee that bitch will say Sesame Street without knowing HBO owns it. The only good shows on PBS were Rick Bayless and Ming Tsai's cooking shows. With Youtube now taking the job of PBS, I can just watch them there.
I like that guy, the daytripper who tours Texas, but I think he has funding outside of PBS and posts most of his stuff on YouTube, so once again, no big loss from defunding PBS. I also enjoyed some of their Frontline documentaries, like that one about John McCain's no vote on Obamacare's repeal, but those documentaries are undeniably biased towards the liberal side, and they are once again available on YouTube, so no big loss from defunding PBS.
 
This may come to a shock to you, but the Ukrainians did not want to be rolled over.
Show me where I said they did.
the reason the Ukrainians overthrew their own government demanded his resignation. Is simply due to the fact is the man they elected was embezzling large amounts of the country's wealth
IMG_9136.webp IMG_9322.webp
Unlike those that came after him?
Including those that used Hunter Biden as a bribery cutout for access to VP Joe Biden, after Obama and Hillary arranged the overthrow of the legitimate government of the Ukraine as part of their program of global uprisings?

Is this the same guy they ‘organically’ rose up and deposed for picking a much better deal for his people from Russia, than that offered by the West?

IMG_1838.webp IMG_1855.webp

You might want to actually look up a few independent news sources instead of trusting a US news media that gleefully embraced Obama’s removal of anti-propaganda legislation.
 
What was the thigh gap one?
Thigh gap breakdown
There was also ‘bikini bridge’ (gap between hipbones and bikini straps when woman lay on their backs) and ‘strap gap’ (gap between chest and bikini straps from having actual boobs). But these were not as successful because even modern women have some form of primitive pattern recognition that stops them from falling for dumb shit a second and third time*.

*Does not apply to: thinking Chad will stick around after he fucks you, adopting pitbulls, thinking illegal immigrants are just nice hardworking people who just need a break, thinking niggers will commit to raising children, voting for female Democrat presidential candidates, believing it wasn’t real socialism, etc. List is not complete and SITHRAK! Misogyny LLC reserves the right to add additional examples without warning, include the identity of retards who cry about being offended, and to brutally mock those same individuals for being a) stupid b) female and c) incorrect. If pain persists, kill yourselves, cuntoids.

here is where they were, there are gates.
FYI
IMG_7497.webp IMG_6614.webp
 
Last edited:
I like that guy, the daytripper who tours Texas, but I think he has funding outside of PBS and posts most of his stuff on YouTube, so once again, no big loss from defunding PBS. I also enjoyed some of their Frontline documentaries, like that one about John McCain's no vote on Obamacare's repeal, but those documentaries are undeniably biased towards the liberal side, and they are once again available on YouTube, so no big loss from defunding PBS.
Traditional TV is on its way out like it or not, viewership is continuing to go down, its a shame PBS had to go (whether you agree with its politics or not) but I can't say I'm surprised.
I like this new Hulk Hogan more then the old one. Way more calm and rational.
 
Back