Are the men up in arms about the censorship of rape and incest porn games outing themselves as nonces?

[Vitrealis]

I think they are.

I think porn should be illegal, porn isn't freedom of speech, creation and distribution of porn should be regarded as a crime. I commend those feminists for getting this done.

There has been censorship of much more important things in the past and there has never been this kind of outrage. So I have no option left but to believe that this isn't an issue about "freedom of speech" for those complaining, but an issue of "I can't coom to my favorite incest & rape porn".

I find it very concerning how much people are malding about this and how much they're willing to do in order to uphold "free speech" on this. I've never seen a large group of normies get this involved in any other case of censorship.

Where were these men when Ross Ulbricht got imprisoned for allowing people to freely transact? Where were these men when Julian Assange was arrested? Where have they been all these years where he has been kept and tortured for the terrible crime of journalism? Where are the men rallying to defend Roger Ver's right to (actual) freedom of speech (as opposed to rape porn distribution)?

Some people claim that this is a slippery slope, but the slippery slope didn't start here, and when it actually started, with things of actual importance, they didn't really give a rat's ass.

 

[Ruined by the Rain]

You're posting on a site where the admin got debanked and you support debanking for porn games?

Lmao

I'm not on the side of incest porn games, I'm on the side of not letting visa/mastercard fuck you up the ass the way they did with my region. If you can't wire money across regions it defeats the fucking purpose of a worldwide financial service

 

[A-Stump]

Incest and rape doesn't equate to pedophilia. Steam never allowed that.

And on that note it's the 'slippery slope' principle. They get you for the most extreme things and then they feel comfortable going after less extreme things.

 

[Vitrealis]

You're posting on a site where the admin got debanked and you support debanking for porn games?

Yes.

 

[Ruined by the Rain]

Least authoritarian moralfag

 

[merpalerpaherp]

No form of censorship is good regardless of what it is and it's even gayer coming from big banking giants.

 

[Need for Sped]

This topic has been argued to death, but as people said here, it's not about the porn. If you make debanking an actual thing, then it's only a matter of time until its scope gets progressively wider, as we have seen time and time again. This was a moronic argument before, but after the 2020 COVID retardation and all the "Censorship is acceptable if it's about Misinformation(tm)", it's flat out retarded to think it's not going to bite you in the ass within less than a decade it's implemented (Hell, even just a couple of years).

 

[Vitrealis]

No form of censorship is good regardless of what it is

Really? So we should be allowing people to publish and distribute snuff material as well as child porn and zoophilia, then. I guess since material that indulges in the disturbed rape and incest fantasies of porn addicted lunatics shouldn't be censored, there's no reason why that kind of material should be either.

This topic has been argued to death, but as people said here, it's not about the porn.

I beg to differ.

If you make debanking an actual thing, then it's only a matter of time until its scope gets progressively wider, as we have seen time and time again.

Cool. Where were all these people when the Canadian truckers' bank accounts got frozen? Where was all the outrage? I didn't hear a blip. Let me know when people get up in arms about the debanking of people fighting tyranny, then I might take it seriously when they get up in arms about their right to coom to rape of their imaginary little sister.

 

[merpalerpaherp]

Really? So we should be allowing people to publish and distribute snuff material as well as child porn and zoophilia, then. I guess since material that indulges in the disturbed rape and incest fantasies of porn addicted lunatics shouldn't be censored, there's no reason why that kind of material should be either.

You're an idiot.

There is an insane difference between things that are illegal and carry penalties by law and the banking industry telling you what you can and cannot do.

These things need to be handled and enforced by law of which governments are failing or neglicting to do with things like loli porn and the like already. So if you want to throw a hissy fit about porn, maybe go yell at the feds about that instead.

Banks are not the government, they are not your friend, and they are not the police.

 

[Ruined by the Rain]

Poster is kinda retarded ngl

 

[Need for Sped]

Cool. Where were all these people when the Canadian truckers' bank accounts got frozen? Where was all the outrage? I didn't hear a thing. Let me know when people get up in arms about the debanking of people fighting tyranny, then I might take it seriously when they get up in arms about their right to coom to rape of their imaginary little sister.

Unless you're talking about a specific high profile personality who you can track his ideological position at a given time, I don't get your point. How do you even know that people criticizing debanking now weren't criticizing debanking the Canadian truckers back in the day? Hell, if I wanted to be extra nitpicky about it, you could even make the point that some people didn't even consider debanking an actual thing up until it happened to the Canadian truckers, and are now aware that it's definitely in the cards, and as such are much more wary of anything in the same line.

Also, there was a metric ton of outrage against the debanking back in the day, but it wasn't certainly a mainstream position. So if you're trying to make a retrospective comparison based on the mainstream reaction, you're a retard.

 

[PonderosaPete]

Why are you people so bad at falling for bait?

 

[Vitrealis]

There is an insane difference between things that are illegal and carry penalties by law and the banking industry telling you what you can and cannot do.

It seems like the point is flying over your head, my friend. It's not about banks telling you what you can and cannot do, because if that were the case people would have cared about banks freezing people's accounts for protesting tyrannical measures back when it happened. Most people didn't give a shit. Now it's porn, and people are throwing a hissy fit.
Also, you don't need something to be illegal and punishable by law to know it's wrong.

Banks are not the government, they are not your friend, and they are not the police.

The government and the police aren't your friend either, my guy. I'm not cheering for banks. I'm glad that children can no longer access rape and incest porn, even if I despise banks. I've been unbanked myself for political reasons.
You're just not getting it, are you? My issue is that people claim to care about freedom and censorship, but it's not really the case. I've never witnessed this kind of outrage to the point that it has reached.

Either some of you responding have comprehension issues or are just being as disingenuous as those who claim this is a censorship problem for them and "totally not about the porn".

Why are you people so bad at falling for bait?

Not bait. I'm being completely sincere.

 

[Vitrealis]

Unless you're talking about a specific high profile personality who you can track his ideological position at a given time, I don't get your point.

Maybe read the post at the top before replying.

How do you even know that people criticizing debanking now weren't criticizing debanking the Canadian truckers back in the day? Hell, if I wanted to be extra nitpicky about it, you could even make the point that some people didn't even consider debanking an actual thing up until it happened to the Canadian truckers, and are now aware that it's definitely in the cards, and as such are much more wary of anything in the same line.

Also, there was a metric ton of outrage against the debanking back in the day, but it wasn't certainly a mainstream position.

So there wasn't a metric ton of outrage. Nothing ever came close to this.

So if you're trying to make a retrospective comparison based on the mainstream reaction, you're a retard.

Sure lol

 

[Ruined by the Rain]

Why are you people so bad at falling for bait?

Look at his other posts. He's an auth who demonstrates the slippery slope pretty well. First bans steam games, then suddenly everything is banned and you'll be eating the bugs

 

[Need for Sped]

So there wasn't a metric ton of outrage. Nothing ever came close to this.

Either you're arguing in bad faith or you're straight up retarded. If it wasn't a mainstream position, it's because every single mainstream media outlet was arguing for the debanking of the truckers in lockstep with whatever the government said, as it had happened throughout the COVID retardation. In any non-censored forum, the opinion was overwhelmingly against the debanking, for obvious reasons.

 

[PonderosaPete]

Look at his other posts. He's an auth who demonstrates the slippery slope pretty well. First bans steam games, then suddenly everything is banned and you'll be eating the bugs

The one who shit posts must take heed, to not become what he hates the most.

 

[Ruined by the Rain]

The one who shit posts must take heed, to not become what he hates the most.

I'm usually pretty good at telling genuine dogshit opinions from bait

 

[Vitrealis]

In any non-censored forum

I'm talking about people taking action in retaliation, and I'm talking about things not just being talked about in underground "conspiracy theorist" circles, but splashing over to the mainstream in which people are now going insane because degenerate gooning material is no longer accessible to children.

I'm sorry if this pisses you off (not), but I don't think these same porn-addled men even know who Roger Ver is, or are familiar with Ross Ulbricht beyond hearing his name in the news a couple times.

 

[Poison]

I think porn should be illegal

It shouldn't be up to payment processors to decide what content is permissable or not, that power sould only be reserved to the government. The issue isn't about the porn being censored, it's about payment processors effectively acting as a pseudogovernment by limiting the kinds of transactions people are allowed to make based on their content policy or caving into pressure from an activist group rather than legality. Whether or not porn should be censored is an entirely different conversation and your being intellectually dishonest by trying to frame the problem this way