- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
Except maybe Peter Coffin.
He said no human being, Trombonista.
That is bullshit.
If you don't challenge speech you dislike, you present no reason why it should be stopped, and by trying to stop it without specifying why it's bad except for calling it "hate speech", you will only make people wonder "well, why is it hate speech?".
Granted, some hate speech is very obvious, but I'd rather the people who spew hate reveal themselves for the hateful bigots they are and thus be discredited as opposed to trying to violently silence them and only making them look like the underdog even if they are bigots, simply because they have an opinion and you'd rather see them beaten to a pulp for having it then letting them have their say like anyone else.
If Laci Green really is trying to broaden her horizons, I hope she considers that. And even if this just a cynical ploy to better herself in some fiscal sense, I would still hope she became more open-minded in the process.
Do you know why this shit started?
Because the assholes who push it couldn't win a debate if their lives depended on it. Look at all the fuckers in their movement who push this de-platforming shit the hardest: From Assata "#3 on the FBI's Most Wanted List" Shakur, to Sophia "Transexual Jay" Banks, none of them can defend their ideas in public. They have nothing to stand on. Under it all, they have fucking empty chambers and they can't stand up to even the slightest scrutiny.
That's why they push the whole thoughtcrime shit. Not one has ever successfully won a stand-up fight.