- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
Nora is projecting again. She knows her mad libs aren't art and gets butthurt when someone points that out.
NoraReed / Nora Fleck / Nora Reed Heineman-Fleck and the Norasphere - The neverending fuck-ups of a sadistic thumb and tons of white knights
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
Nora is projecting again. She knows her mad libs aren't art and gets butthurt when someone points that out.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Someone who has never had a job in her fat, ugly life is calling other people "amateurs." 
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
Art is Picasso. Art is Bob Ross. Art is Leonardo diVinci, who would hate SJWs. Art is Frida Kahlo and her unibrow.
Art is NOT Mad Libs. Sorry, Nora. GFY.
Art is NOT Mad Libs. Sorry, Nora. GFY.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Are we finally getting PissNora?!That actually reminds me. Anyone who has experience with bots, drop me a line.
There's been a bot we've needed for some time on Twitter....
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
You know me so well.
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
And now...
Nora REEEEEd and arguments with a support bot. Also, the answer to your question is never. They get bounceback from violating the 1st Amendment. The same one that allows you to sound like a fat cunt.
A bot as useless as Nora.
You're not wise, Noring. You're an ignorant cunt catering to ignorant man and woman children.
I think this is actually Nora's best reflection on how she actually talks to anyone else that's human.
Nora REEEEEd and arguments with a support bot. Also, the answer to your question is never. They get bounceback from violating the 1st Amendment. The same one that allows you to sound like a fat cunt.
A bot as useless as Nora.
You're not wise, Noring. You're an ignorant cunt catering to ignorant man and woman children.
I think this is actually Nora's best reflection on how she actually talks to anyone else that's human.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
Twitter support how many retweets to delete spambots?
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
So many things I want to disprove from this literal butter troll. But I'll dump the pictures, and my fellow educated members can help me eviscerate this blithering moron. Because there's a lot of pure bullshit going on here from a very uneducated General Education twat.
And the article she points out?
“GamerGate doesn’t want games to be art” @NoraReed https://medium.com/@NoraReed/gamergate-doesn-t-want-games-to-be-art-f5510e692f48
And bonus, she gets eviscerated in the comments by our own GethN7, and throws her usual barrl canned response, because Nora doesn't like having reasonable debate like a mature adult.
And the article she points out?
“GamerGate doesn’t want games to be art” @NoraReed https://medium.com/@NoraReed/gamergate-doesn-t-want-games-to-be-art-f5510e692f48
And bonus, she gets eviscerated in the comments by our own GethN7, and throws her usual barrl canned response, because Nora doesn't like having reasonable debate like a mature adult.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2016
Huh. Unemployed Nora with her bachelor's degree in Goin' to College Studies thinks Kiwis are underqualified to opine on the meaning of art. I don't mean to hurt anyone's feelings, but I bet more than one of you assholes has the liberal arts credentials to call bullshit.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
Nora just wants validation that what she's doing matters and is important. If she calls it art, she can briefly, for a fleeting moment, feel like she hasn't completed wasted her life, her chance at education, the chance to make an impact on the world. Debating her on art just feeds her delusions.
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
It does, yes. But at the same time, you can be brutally cunning with the twat. Because of the twisted ideal of the world that her breadwinner of a father has taught her. Nora's views are twisted by John's aberration of views.
It may be why her mother cut most ties with her, save the times when she makes Nora act like a member of the family. Nora doesn't have her own views, if I can be blunt. She has the views of John Fleck. And John doesn't have any true views.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
Interestingly, while Nora herself despises the oppression she suffered back before she had a cult of personality, she has no compunction about dishing it out now that she has some level of power - it really serves to drive home how Nora really should never be allowed near any place where she has administrative authority. She uses her followers to pursue her eternal vendetta against those she feels wronged her (RAAAAAANDIIIII, SHAAAANLEEEEEY, KIIIIIWIIIIIS!!), and she gathers her Autistic armies to assault anyone that disagrees with her. It's a vicious cycle of abuse and use, one that keeps Nora as one of the most vitriolic cows the Farms covers - after all, she reasons, if it was done to Nora, she's perfectly justified in doing it to others.
What's hilarious about this though is that while Nora can easily leverage her followers, she expects no less than outright betrayal every single time and as such, she figures its best to betray others first. Alliances within the Norasphere arise and fall without a single bond of trust. If one person the Norasphere touches grows too arrogant or dangerous, the entire thing will band together to take them down a notch or two - excepting, of course, the control of Nora herself. The rest of her Rat King branch exists in mortal terror of her, and would leave if not for the fact that Nora would savage them next.
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
Which is why in the new Rat King Chart, I am establishing warnings on trolling. Anyone in red like Nora doesn't need to be trolled nor deserves any legitimate gripe to her rants. I did take a step back and realized she is a bigger piece than realized.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
I don't think even the loopiest hippy-dippy art professor in the world would accept someone's portfolio if it was filled with coloring book pages and paint-by-numbers.
That's the problem with Nora calling her bots "art." It's not that we're big uneducated stupidheads who've never heard of Duchamp. It's that we've heard of Duchamp and we know the context his art was made in. Contextually, there's no way to argue that Nora's work is "art" unless we're willing to, I don't know, consider it "art" when someone makes a .gif of a youtube video segment, which renders the term basically meaningless and shits on millenia of people being stunningly creative.
This is the general trans schtick. "Since the boundaries are fuzzy and context-dependent, everything is whatever I say it is!" This is a classic spectrum fallacy: "since you can't say where red ends and blue begins, this apple is blue if I say so!"
That's the problem with Nora calling her bots "art." It's not that we're big uneducated stupidheads who've never heard of Duchamp. It's that we've heard of Duchamp and we know the context his art was made in. Contextually, there's no way to argue that Nora's work is "art" unless we're willing to, I don't know, consider it "art" when someone makes a .gif of a youtube video segment, which renders the term basically meaningless and shits on millenia of people being stunningly creative.
This is the general trans schtick. "Since the boundaries are fuzzy and context-dependent, everything is whatever I say it is!" This is a classic spectrum fallacy: "since you can't say where red ends and blue begins, this apple is blue if I say so!"
- Joined
- May 6, 2016
"This is a tired argument that has been going on in circles for thousands of years," they said before aggressively taking one of the most standard perspectives in that argument and tweeting about it 500 times
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2016
it's fun watching nora express her inner pseudo-intellectual because she never actually knows what she is talking about
I'd probably find her more irritating if I actually read her autistic textwalls, but I don't, so:
I'd probably find her more irritating if I actually read her autistic textwalls, but I don't, so:
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Imagine being so desperate for attention, after being put on every SJW blocklist in existence for being complete trash, that you spend time screeching angrily at a bot.
It doesn't really matter if they're art. They're shit, whatever they are, and if they're art, they're shit art, and Nora is still a waste of (lots and lots of) flesh.
flipper
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2016
Having a brother who went to art school, I can say that those "what is art?" discussions get really tedious really quickly and shouldn't be brought up by anyone over the age of 25.
- Joined
- May 2, 2017
I would, but that requires me to be a morbidly obese autistic cunt who masturbates to people who died.
I'm already autistic enough, thanks.