💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.7%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 275 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 162 23.7%

  • Total voters
    684
It's nice to see him owning the NERDS by doing a nine hour Lego stream.

Once again Total Balldo Victory!

He should hurry and Lowtax himself now.
 
"please rearrange society so I can have more drugs, I'm hopelessly addicted, I need them!"
Funny you're saying that because we got his thoughts on this recently:
Make a better system. We already have models for it.
Of course people should be penalized if they are driving under the influence of some illegal drug, especially if they cause harm. Those laws already exist. So what are we doing?
Many of these drugs were made illegal specifically to stifle foreign farmers, in an environment where global trade was wildly different and competition was wildly different. These substances can be made in America, in approved, inspected labs. They could be distributed through prescriptions or a controlled program, with limits similar to what we have for Sudafed or pseudoephedrine, where you can only buy a regulated amount in a given time.
We already have all the mechanisms needed to do this. And frankly, if pharmaceutical companies were allowed to test and experiment with currently illegal drugs, they could start eliminating some of the harmful aspects of them. They really could. They do it all the time.

The war on drugs has routinely failed. Drug use is increasing, overdoses are increasing. We have seen nothing but failure despite all of the efforts, all of the money, all of the lives wasted on it, all of the arrests, all of the jail time, all of the ignoring of treatment for people who need it and instead incarcerating them and putting them through hellish withdrawals in the worst environments possible, and all of the suicide associated with these things.

All of that has been spent for no gain, only worsening conditions. And yet, with alcohol, we already have the model. We saw what alcohol prohibition did. It bred organized crime throughout the United States. It really brought organized crime to the U.S. in a way that hadn’t existed before. And still, somehow, we say, "Oh yeah, this is good."

No, it wasn’t. They repealed prohibition because they realized they could not prohibit alcohol. People will always find a way to drink. They will find a way to make it and use it. So you have the other option: regulate, not eliminate.

I am not a big fan of regulation, but if regulation brings safer environments for our kids, where they are just going to have a little pill and have a little fun – because that is the overwhelming majority of recreational drug use, someone having a little bit of something and having a little fun – then that is better. Most recreational drug use is not chronic addictive behavior. It is not that. And if you think it is, then you are ignorant of how many people around you occasionally use recreational drugs.

The president here is acknowledging that, so acknowledge it and govern better. Make a better system. We already have models for it.

Of course people should be penalized if they are driving under the influence of some illegal drug, especially if they cause harm. Those laws already exist. So what are we doing?

Many of these drugs were made illegal specifically to stifle foreign farmers, in an environment where global trade was wildly different and competition was wildly different. These substances can be made in America, in approved, inspected labs. They could be distributed through prescriptions or a controlled program, with limits similar to what we have for Sudafed or pseudoephedrine, where you can only buy a regulated amount in a given time.

We already have all the mechanisms needed to do this. And frankly, if pharmaceutical companies were allowed to test and experiment with currently illegal drugs, they could start eliminating some of the harmful aspects of them. They really could. They do it all the time.

It is crazy how much logic we have abandoned in the drug war, throwing eggs at a brick wall hoping it breaks. It never will.
 
Women named Kayla Rekieta can't cook, can't clean, they don't want to work, nothing. Men named Nick Rekieta get in relationships with them and wonder why shit ain't working. That's because all he wants to do is pop pills, smoke weed, get drunk, lay around, suck dick, eat hot garbage, tweet on his phone, lose his hair, be bisexual, talk on the phone in the shower, lie, take selfies, and talk shit online cuz he's always on his phone.

Women named Kayla Rekieta can't cook. All she knows is cuckolds, watch Star Trek, Lego, be bisexual, eat Nick slop, and lie.
 
The war on drugs has routinely failed. Drug use is increasing, overdoses are increasing. We have seen nothing but failure despite all of the efforts, all of the money, all of the lives wasted on it, all of the arrests, all of the jail time, all of the ignoring of treatment for people who need it and instead incarcerating them and putting them through hellish withdrawals in the worst environments possible, and all of the suicide associated with these things.

All of that has been spent for no gain, only worsening conditions. And yet, with alcohol, we already have the model. We saw what alcohol prohibition did. It bred organized crime throughout the United States. It really brought organized crime to the U.S. in a way that hadn’t existed before. And still, somehow, we say, "Oh yeah, this is good."

No, it wasn’t. They repealed prohibition because they realized they could not prohibit alcohol. People will always find a way to drink. They will find a way to make it and use it. So you have the other option: regulate, not eliminate.

I am not a big fan of regulation, but if regulation brings safer environments for our kids, where they are just going to have a little pill and have a little fun – because that is the overwhelming majority of recreational drug use, someone having a little bit of something and having a little fun – then that is better. Most recreational drug use is not chronic addictive behavior. It is not that. And if you think it is, then you are ignorant of how many people around you occasionally use recreational drugs.

The president here is acknowledging that, so acknowledge it and govern better. Make a better system. We already have models for it.

Of course people should be penalized if they are driving under the influence of some illegal drug, especially if they cause harm. Those laws already exist. So what are we doing?

Many of these drugs were made illegal specifically to stifle foreign farmers, in an environment where global trade was wildly different and competition was wildly different. These substances can be made in America, in approved, inspected labs. They could be distributed through prescriptions or a controlled program, with limits similar to what we have for Sudafed or pseudoephedrine, where you can only buy a regulated amount in a given time.

We already have all the mechanisms needed to do this. And frankly, if pharmaceutical companies were allowed to test and experiment with currently illegal drugs, they could start eliminating some of the harmful aspects of them. They really could. They do it all the time.

It is crazy how much logic we have abandoned in the drug war, throwing eggs at a brick wall hoping it breaks. It never will.
The war on Drugs was never meant to be won, it was always meant to help the state keep a monopoly on power, and to create a boogeyman with which to justify large amounts of taxes and money printing. The war on drugs did not fail, it is doing exactly what it was designed to do.
 
Funny you're saying that because we got his thoughts on this recently:
He's a fucking retard. Pharmaceutical companies made a better drug: Oxycodone. Regulated. Controlled. Tested. How did that work out, Nick? The reality is douchebag addicts like Nick buy illegal drugs when the regulated adderall isn't enough. He had plenty of access to pharmaceutical drugs and he's just a dick for saying "if only they were legal..." Fentanyl was synthesized when oxy wasn't enough. Now the appetite was created, there is no longer any diversion of prescription opiods to the street. Addicts like Nick prefer the street drugs and buy the street drug even when safer and regulated products are available. He's such a pig.
 
Legos aside, I genuinely don’t remember this particular chat Nick sent to Pedoton - my life doesn’t revolve around Nick, thankfully - but our heroine @elb saved it.

Nick chatting about Aaron’s daughter, name redacted. I THINK SOMEONE NEEDS TO HANG ON THE WALL.

Someone get the woodchipper for this faggot ASAP. Yes, I’m MATI.View attachment 8258795
Nick has a habit of speaking disparagingly of women who reject his sexual advances
:thinking:
 
regulation brings safer environments for our kids, where they are just going to have a little pill and have a little fun – because that is the overwhelming majority of recreational drug use, someone having a little bit of something and having a little fun – then that is better. Most recreational drug use is not chronic addictive behavior. It is not that. And if you think it is, then you are ignorant of how many people around you occasionally use recreational drugs.
1765129966404.png1765129884896.png
To counterpoint the proliferation of "little fun drugs", I present Exhibits #A and #B.
 
When Nick was arrested, he was days away from sitting on the sit of the road, in handcuffs, watching a stretcher carrying the body of someone he killed drunk driving. Probably one of his children.
 
View attachment 8260333View attachment 8260326
To counterpoint the proliferation of "little fun drugs", I present Exhibits #A and #B.
To be fair alcohol is legal and most people use it in moderation - but Nick was downing a bottle a day. The same with galaxy gas - which AFAIK isn't even an illicit 'substance' (there's no active chemical component, it just deprives your brain of oxygen).

Nick will find a way to abuse even the most innocent thing.
 
He definitely needs to push this line of reasoning.

Nick: "If I'm not a lawyer, I'm not bound by your rules."
Bar: "Correct. In that case we move from professional discipline to felony. It's against the law to hold yourself out as eligible to practice law if you are not. We will also disqualify you from ever returning to the bar. Aren't you on probation?"
By Nick's logic I could lie and say that I'm a Minnesota lawyer, start taking clients under these false pretenses, and the bar couldn't do anything because I'm not licensed.
 
I’d love to see Nick explain this away: would he trust a suspended surgeon to operate on him, a suspended accountant to manage his 401k, or a suspended driver to taxi his kid around?

Suspension isn’t a quirky little “time-out” in which he bizarrely believes to himself to be a valid member, yet placed outside of its adjudication. Suspension the removal of the privilege to be treated as a member of that profession.
If he wouldn’t bet his life, his money, or his child’s safety on a suspended doctor, accountant, or driver, why should anyone treat a suspended lawyer as a credible authority on anything in that field?
What makes him think he can pretend to operate a law firm, granting professional reputation and deference, when he openly defies the bar association ethical framework? Only Nick logic applies.
 
Rekieta Law is not a thing. He let the LLC lapse years ago, he hasn't had a physical presence in longer than the LLC lapse, oh and WHAT FUCKING CLIENTS?!?
 
Rekieta Law is not a thing. He let the LLC lapse years ago, he hasn't had a physical presence in longer than the LLC lapse, oh and WHAT FUCKING CLIENTS?!?
Fully agree, it would make sense if the law firm was an active entity that he operated up until the point of suspension.

With that, he could arguably say that he's planning to continue practice upon completion of CLEs, with the law-firm in a dormant state.
The Youtube channel opening is simply a misnomer, apologise, focus on CLEs, move on.
However, this is Nicholas Robert Rekieta, and he is a raging, spiteful retard. Instead of saying "oh yeah shit sorry I fucked up, doing my CLEs now", he has to do this self-inflicted pretend 4D chess game against disciplinary proceedings lawyer Tim Burke for [?????] purpose.
 
People ITT wondering how Nick and Kayla are caring for their kids after streaming for 10 hours until 6am - they aren't. The eldest is raising his siblings. Nick even ramped up his streaming after the 18th birthday, and don't forget Nick even told the Court the eldest was going to take some of the responsibilities of his parents since his parents were strung out druggies who couldn't run their household anymore.
 
People ITT wondering how Nick and Kayla are caring for their kids after streaming for 10 hours until 6am - they aren't. The eldest is raising his siblings. Nick even ramped up his streaming after the 18th birthday, and don't forget Nick even told the Court the eldest was going to take some of the responsibilities of his parents since his parents were strung out druggies who couldn't run their household anymore.
Right towards the end of the stream, Nick openly states he's "going to bed".
So he dragged his wife onto a NINE HOUR OVERNIGHT STREAM, makes her ruin her quaint hobby of Lego building for a total of 60 viewers, gets trolled repeatedly and then crashes out in bed at 6AM CST.

Its good to know that the kids will be looked after by an exhausted mother, or their other siblings until 2PM when daddy finally recovers from his Monster Energy Drink crashout.
Why, Nicky, we can certainly arrange a little experiment of your drug utopia, but with a caveat: instant, on-the-spot capital prosecution for any sort of disruptive behavior on said substances. Deal?
A truly Faustian bargain, his soul will be claimed.
 
Nick and Kayla have most likely switched from near-OD levels of illegal drugs to near OD levels of caffeine and prescription meds (likely still getting extra doses of the latter from his dealer, explaining why he's still talking about him)

That's probably why Nick's been saying stuff like "if you're using prescription meds you can't criticize me for using cocaine" because he's getting a similar high from prescription meds now and sees them as interchangable.
 
Back
Top Bottom