📚 Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

It's almost like they want a hemicorectomy but want to keep the legs. Screw the pelvis that much your essentially causing the same issues they do.
 
My reaction to this information:
Totally understandable.

Unironically I see the first SEVERAL of these having very high odds of being EFFECTIVELY paraplegic from sheer hip pain / loose bones. Think of how many people have fucked up disintegrating neovaginas, and apply that to a NEW surgery.... yeah....

We getting the wheel chair tranny squad in the works

 
The only thing "dropping" is the already pitiful survival rate of Troons if this actually gets accepted by anyone not drug-addled, retarded, or both.
 
And can someone please "male socialise" these pooners that there is an order you undress as a male. You take your socks off before your pants, and your shirt comes off first. You don't want to post yourself on the internet wearing a shirt but no pants, or only socks, even a male model will look dumb that way. (never post yourself on the internet), but if you have to, the same rules apply as when undressing with someone. Even Arnold in his prime will give any woman the 'ick" if he is naked but for socks, or wearing a shirt without pants.
Everybody knows it's pants first, then the undershirt, then the shoes.
 
Unironically I see the first SEVERAL of these having very high odds of being EFFECTIVELY paraplegic from sheer hip pain / loose bones. Think of how many people have fucked up disintegrating neovaginas, and apply that to a NEW surgery.... yeah....

We getting the wheel chair tranny squad in the works
I'm no doctor or nurse, but it looks like if they turned their hips the wrong way, they'd be liable to fracture or full on break their hips. Maybe the SRS doctors are just playing 4d chess to get their Orthopedic surgeon buddies extra work in hip replacements in a couple years.
 
But if you suggested lipo for anorexics or stomach pumps for bulimics or psychadelics for schizos they'd say you're crazy, but THIS mental issue is totally actually a body problem. Jesus fucking kill me now.
 
Last edited:
If I'm donating my body to "science", I expect they do some real medical shit or at least try weapons on it. If there is any risk that my body will be used to train for troon booty surgery I'm ripping my donor card right now.

And can someone please "male socialise" these pooners that there is an order you undress as a male. You take your socks off before your pants, and your shirt comes off first. You don't want to post yourself on the internet wearing a shirt but no pants, or only socks, even a male model will look dumb that way. (never post yourself on the internet), but if you have to, the same rules apply as when undressing with someone. Even Arnold in his prime will give any woman the 'ick" if he is naked but for socks, or wearing a shirt without pants.

Fuck. This is actually good advice. No one ever told me. I had been doing it wrong for years.

Am I a troon? I’d know, right guys? Guys?

" Socks before or after trousers, but never socks before pants. That’s the rule. Makes a man look scary, like a chicken. "

 
Couldn't quote/reply to @Magic Pickle's post, but re: Witternberg victim whose account kept getting banned...
Her PA actually thought coming into my room and gaslighting me with the virtues of having initially a 3 inch vagina was perfectly fine because “many” women have a three inch vagina?!?!?

I couldn't decide what was my favorite in the process of unpacking this statement - the uniquely male trait of assessing success purely through numerical measure, the unwitting admittance of viewing a woman's value being tied to her sex by equating a lengthy vaginal canal as something virtuous, or the absolute lack of knowledge about the female anatomy.

Only such a porn-addled brain would be surprised that a 3 inch vagina is, in fact, perfectly fine and totally virtuous. Here's a study that measured a range of 2.7 - 5.8in (6.9 - 14.8cm) in vaginal length of 39 women. Here's another that states a mean of 2.5in (6.3cm) from an MRI scan of 28 women. Hell, even accounting for sexual arousal, another work measured 2.8 - 3.1in (7 - 8cm) in length when in an unstimulated state, and 4.3 - 4.7in (11 -12cm) in an aroused state.

Yeah yeah, I know, bla-bla-troons need the depth to accommodate penetrative sex because the fauxgina does not adapt in dimension as a response to sexual arousal-bla-bla, but I don't give a damn. It's so good. It's a glorious reveal of this idiot having based his knowledge of the female anatomy by legitimizing pornstars taking in entire flagpoles as realistic, combined with truly believing that Wittenbutcher will give him even a facsimile of the real thing. Now he wakes from his illusions to reckon with the horrors of his own choices, experiencing such cognitive dissonance to the point that he's accusing the poor PA of gaslighting him that 3-inch vaginas are, in fact, perfectly fine!

On a side note - those sources were taken from a quick trip to Wikipedia, but the last one I found to be an archive of a webpage titled "Transsexual Women's Resources" written in 2003, where the fact actually came from quoting another work - but that's besides the point. Enjoy this excerpt from a time when, despite being a resource page for MtFs, one could still acknowledge that men who get the chop to somehow become women... still behave like men:
Biologic males commonly boast about and exaggerate their genital dimensions. Some male-to-female transsexuals engage in this kind of behavior after undergoing SRS: "My surgeon gave me six inches of vaginal depth." "Oh yeah? Well, my surgeon gave me seven inches." Sometimes one hears a variation on the same general theme: "My boyfriend is so big that I needed eight inches to accommodate him." And so forth.

Listening to comments like these, some transsexual women may develop unrealistic beliefs and expectations concerning vaginal depth following vaginoplasty. Here are a few observations that transsexual women might want to keep in mind:

Vaginal depth in natal females typically ranges from 7 to 14 cm, or about 3 to 5-1/2 inches.

This one made me laugh:
Transsexual women who find that their vaginas are shorter than the penises of their male partners should realize that many natal females share the same experience. Most of these natal women are not running to plastic surgeons asking to have their vaginas deepened.

And to round off my starting point: forget only having 3 or even 2 inches. You're going to lose it all anyway:
Measurement of vaginal depth during the immediate postoperative period may explain some reports of vaginal depth greater than 15 cm, or about 6 inches.

Tissue swelling occurs at the vaginal opening immediately after surgery, is maximal on postoperative day two or three, and typically persists for several weeks. Consequently, vaginal depth measured in the immediate postoperative period is likely to overestimate final vaginal depth by an unknown amount.

Oh yeah. Totally worth it!!!!1!1!!1!1
 
Last edited:
If there is any risk that my body will be used to train for troon booty surgery I'm ripping my donor card right now.
I think you're looking at this backwards. We need to do everything we can to help advance these surgeries and further cripple dangerous perverts.
As an extra bonus, they will also become homebound so we will not have to encounter them IRL when we are out and around.
Counterpoint: troons are already the most obnoxious entitled people on the planet, so putting them in a wheelchair will only make them more insufferable when they do manage to escape containment.
 
This one made me laugh:
Anatomically, its also because womens vaginas actually SHIFT when aroused, growing longer and more accommodating.

Try putting THAT feature into a neovagina.

....Actually come to think of it, how would you graft that inside a man with a vag transplant, AND keep that feature? I don't know how all the structure works in a woman, but seems to me if you got aroused the lengthening wouldn't have room or..... or what? would they try to arouse it WHILE grafting it?? I can only assume the abdominal structures outside the vagina ALSO play a part in that since they need to move out of the way, but im no expert

Seems to me EITHER, you'd shove it into an undersized spot, it wouldn't have room, arousal would crush it...

honestly thinking of it makes me fucking sick. The more I think on it the more I think a transplant is fucking crazy
 
All I can think of are Popples
I have never heard of them. They look like a cross between Care Bears and Wuzzles.

@Magic Pickle
1000036326.png
We all know Troons are inveterate liars but this is so on the nose that it makes me think a KF User is simply trolling these fags.
I haven't seen @Fapcop lately...
 
lmfao. got me with that one.


Counterpoint: They're probably taking it up the ass so much their asshole is blown out and they can't hold their shit in anyway so it's not a problem. Checkmate, chuds.
Imagine you get a prolapse and your whole rectum falls out because you got your pelvis surgically ripped in half

(I'm sorry)
 
Who's ready for new atrocities? Introducing "pelvis widening surgery"!
View attachment 8274095
Height surgery is already invasive enough since by that time, the bones in your legs have been fused and the only way to lengthen them is by breaking them and stretching them out, invariably resulting in weaker bones. I can only imagine what kind of freakshow this pelvis widening shit involves, nevermind what it could do to the joints.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom