Furry Fandom and Drama General

Anyone here mentioned Genesius Wolf? He's a devoutly Catholic gay furry YouTuber who hates da ebil SJWs and has a whole video on the moral quandaries of furry porn. I wish I were creative enough to make that last sentence up, but unfortunately, it's all real.

Another wondiFURous video...

Stopped video.

EDIT: Okay, I actually watched it. Thanks to a wolf with a neon yellow cross on his chest, I now know that I must follow God's covenant and only spank it to Moral Yiff.

Christian furries are fucking weird. I think they actually weird me out more than the ones with disgusting sub-fetishes of it because they seem to be in such denial about their beliefs opposing their fetish.
 
Last edited:
Christian furries are fucking weird. I think they actually weird me out more than the ones with disgusting sub-fetishes of it because they seem to be in such denial about their beliefs opposing their fetish.
it's mostly because they want to be "unique" rather than actually having faith. the definition of heresy.
 
Stopped video.

EDIT: Okay, I actually watched it. Thanks to a wolf with a neon yellow cross on his chest, I now know that I must follow God's covenant and only spank it to Moral Yiff.

Christian furries are fucking weird. I think they actually weird me out more than the ones with disgusting sub-fetishes of it because they seem to be in such denial about their beliefs opposing their fetish.
Hence...
 
Anyone here mentioned Genesius Wolf? He's a devoutly Catholic gay furry YouTuber who hates da ebil SJWs and has a whole video on the moral quandaries of furry porn. I wish I were creative enough to make that last sentence up, but unfortunately, it's all real.

Jesus died on the cross so in two thousand years later a sexual deviant would use it for his fursona spewing his take on things that nobody cares about. Another reason why Jesus is never coming back.
 
Anyone here mentioned Genesius Wolf? He's a devoutly Catholic gay furry YouTuber who hates da ebil SJWs and has a whole video on the moral quandaries of furry porn. I wish I were creative enough to make that last sentence up, but unfortunately, it's all real.
Gotta say, I dig the piss yellow and shit brown color scheme he's got going on there. It feels....appropriate.
 
Christian furries are fucking weird. I think they actually weird me out more than the ones with disgusting sub-fetishes of it because they seem to be in such denial about their beliefs opposing their fetish.
Slightly :powerlevel:, I knew a furry just like that at the college I used to go to. Not only was his Furaffinity profile filled with weird journal posts including him trying to deny he was gay and vore in his favorites, but he was actually browsing vore marked "safe" in the front of class on Furaffinity. He'd also check his Furaffinity messages every single day using school owned computers.
 
How can vore be safe in any way
From what I've seen furries will mark anything "safe" if it doesn't have dicks or show off exposed tits. That's why so much paw fetish art for example is marked as "safe" on sites like Furaffinity or DeviantArt when the reason it was commissioned was to be fapped to, and the same applies to just about every fetish on dA/FA really.
 
How can vore be safe in any way

Sort of like most fetishes, vore seems often to start in childhood, with shit from the kind of daytime TV shows they used to show on Saturday mornings. Some budding weirdo got their first funny tingling feeling when they saw some cartoon character get eaten by a python or whatever, and a pervert was born. There's also stuff where something like that is simply implied.

I still can't imagine it ever being actually "safe" to look at shit like that in any workplace, school, or whatever environment. It's sort of like blue boards on 4chan supposedly safe for work. Lol, no.
 
Stopped video.

EDIT: Okay, I actually watched it. Thanks to a wolf with a neon yellow cross on his chest, I now know that I must follow God's covenant and only spank it to Moral Yiff.

Christian furries are fucking weird. I think they actually weird me out more than the ones with disgusting sub-fetishes of it because they seem to be in such denial about their beliefs opposing their fetish.
I find it hilarious that most of the fan fiction he showed in that video involved homosexual relationships, something highly condemned in Christianity :story:

Also, this:
Leviticus 18:23, NIV. "Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion."
 
I find it hilarious that most of the fan fiction he showed in that video involved homosexual relationships, something highly condemned in Christianity :story:

Also, this:
Leviticus 18:23, NIV. "Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion."
Reminds me of this clever edit!
 
Sing was a dull cash grab, I agree completely with IHE's review of it.

In fact it's odd furries would like it. Beyond talking animals, the characters have no animal-like quirks to them.

The owner of that bedroom must be a basic bitch.

OK, the reused models I'm not too annoyed with. I noticed that was another comment in IHE's review, but then he brings up Bojack and Zootopia as excellent examples of talking animal cartoons.

Both of those reuse models over and over again as well, sometimes touchups being very minimal. It's a bunch of animals, there's only so much you can do to make them unique beyond going 100% furry and giving them exceptional piercings and hair.

But yeah Sing was fucking lazy compared to the aforementioned media, no contest.

The reason why Zootopia was so genius is that their really did their research and translated actual animal anatomy and morphology into animation and anthropomorphization

They consulted real scientists who study animal anatomy and morphology(my professor was one of them) and built the world around them and spared no expense(if anything, they put quite a bit of effort into the movie itself and reneged with marketing and merchandise, a rarity for Disney films)

Sing, like most furry "worlds", simply just make animals walk on two legs and do human stuff; there's nothing about them that really makes them animals(that would require *gasp* real research!)
 
tf4ktD5.png
I'm sure the 49 people who were murdered at Pulse would be happy to know people are buying giant rainbow dog dildos in memory of them.
 
Back