💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that the guy who vigorously defended child predator Ali Alexander is now trying to defend going after kids. Who could have seen that coming!?!
 
IMG_0827.webp
 
SirThomasMaloryII said:
Mossad finally made a direct threat to Nick, I see.
Click to expand...
No?🤣

Nick does this for free as a Killswitch.

For example, one quick search in the Thead and from 2023,
Sprate Header said:
Not sure if this clip's been posted before, but here's Nick showcasing his world-renowned, second-to-none optics by talking about "ephebophilia", "pederasty", and "esoteric Hitler fanaticism":
nicker1.jpg
Click to expand...
Oh yeah you're here to hear about abolishing the age of consent and fucking 16-year-olds? That's more like it!
Click to expand...
Once again, Nick has the audience he wanted and it's used to smear anybody dumb enough to come in to agree with him *yawn*
 
Gibs said:
For context, here is the full section.
Click to expand...
would me copying the link for this post link my Kiwifarms account whatsoever?

also, this stream was INSANE. now, Im not a black and white person. I understand gray areas and controversial opinions are easy to topple with things such as "you're supporting pedos". or easy feel good catch phrases. but this is political suicide, he was building momentum and then this just throws off so many people.

specially to his female supporters, this is probably the biggest LOL he ever did in his career, absolute career rape
 
Gibs said:
Nick Fuentes doubles down and states, “Epstein is my boy, dude. Lets be honest, Epstein was cool as fuck."
View attachment 8435395Source / A
Click to expand...
I know it's been said again and again, but it really fits with all those media outfits that happen to mention the Fuentes faggot as Le Far Right Threat To Gen Z. It serves variously the promote Nick among pedo / pederast tolerant browns, to somehow associate a patriotic outlook with it. If I ate something bad I need to vomit up, all I need to do is put the gay Mexican on the screen.
 
mayuyu’s sweetie pie said:
can someone explain to me whatever happened to this? it wasn’t so long to justify a whole 180 on this like thatView attachment 8435773
Click to expand...
I mean, if you watch the clip u can see he thinks Epstein was a terrible dude and that he's still advocating for the release of the files, its just filled with this "uhhmmm actually" shit turd so its hard to figure out on which side he is
 
Dull fawn said:
I mean, if you watch the clip u can see he thinks Epstein was a terrible dude and that he's still advocating for the release of the files, its just filled with this "uhhmmm actually" shit turd so its hard to figure out on which side he is
Click to expand...
What I don't understand is why die on THIS particular hill? Is he trying to get in bed with Redditors now?
 
mayuyu’s sweetie pie said:
can someone explain to me whatever happened to this? it wasn’t so long to justify a whole 180 on this like thatView attachment 8435773
Click to expand...
Once again, Nick is a Killswitch. An Albatross to dismantle any momentum.

-He starts getting forced back into whatever has influence on modern Right (sperging out the entire time).

This time being young Right wingers in opposition to Israel and it's influence.
-He Cozy.tv-s up with multiple people
-Then some crazy shit starts being said from or comes out about Nick or AF members (The warning stage)
-Finally comes all the smears and hit jobs (The Rugpull)

Usually with all of this not really affecting Nick himself besides him having to go back to the Dissident Right™ sewers. Mainly because his army of Brown Swarthoids will clean it up for him.
dreamworks face said:
the dude is an engagement farmer. he does not have any sincerely held beliefs. he is saying whatever will get the most views at the time.
Click to expand...
I mean it's basically why he embraced Ali Alexander (a fellow gay pedo) despite acknowledging the dude was a Clout Chaser when he initially interacted with him :lit:
 
mayuyu’s sweetie pie said:
can someone explain to me whatever happened to this? it wasn’t so long to justify a whole 180 on this like thatView attachment 8435773
Click to expand...

What do you expect, it's Flip Flop Fuentes.

However, there may be more to this than meets the eye...

I sometimes wonder if part of the Nicholas psyop is to push the limits of cognitive dissonance and gullibility, or in other words to deliberately be so contradictory and ridiculous as to shake out all but the most gullible true believers.

Then the ones that remain are ready for programming, a new MK Ultra.
 
mr_negativity said:
Like the case with many neoreactionaries, he's using the perceived power and influence of the church when it was in it's glory days as part of the LARP of himself as a savior of western civilization. The alternative option is to go eastern orthodox. Never do these pundits go "I'm a Presbyterian" as associating themselves with the small independent corner church with 100 members isn't going to give them an air of authority.
Click to expand...
There's a literal Presbyterian that does this though: Redeemed Zoomer. He makes MS Paint explainer videos and plays Minecraft.
There was a controversy about him supporting the death penalty for LGBT, and for being Jewish. Also some gay discord drama, I think? I don't have the receipts for this except I could probably get the Jewish one since he talks about it semi-frequently.
 
What Nick doesn't get, because he is ignorant of women, is that the issue isn't whether the women were "sexually mature", i.e., went through puberty.

The reason we have the age rules is not because it's not physically possible, or because 13 yr old girls don't think about sex or want sex. We have them as a vestige and remnant of a time when moral societies existed.

See, in virtually all ancient societies, if you took a woman's virginity, their family offered you two choices, marry her or die. Those rules were in place for 20 yr old virgins and 12 yr old virgins.

Morally, Epstein committed crimes against women who were technically of age as well, but the only crimes our society can charge him with is the ones that are illegal. Illegal is not the same as wrong. Many things which are perfectly legal will see you thrown into the lake of fire.

What Epstein did was morally reprehensible, and would still have been evil even if every girl he pimped had just turned 18.

Because he is a fake Christian, Nick misses this, and he and his followers compare Epstein's actions to child marriage.

Marrying one woman for life, taking responsibility for her permanent welfare, even if that union starts when she is legally a minor is not the same as deceiving, grooming, and then PIMPING out a HAREM of minors.

From my Christian view, there are at least 4 crimes, which even apply to the women over 18
- fornication
- entering relationship under false pretenses / sexual deception
- adultery
- pimping

Any of those are worthy of death.
 
"14 and 16 are the minimum ages for marriage in canon law"
And what does this have to do with a jew pimping little white girls to pedop... sorry, "hebephiles"?

For most of European history the average age for women to get married for the first time was what today is as adults of legal age, for men it was a few years older than for women. Royal and dynastic marriages don't count because those were about dynastic politics, something that doesn't even exist today. I would hazard a guess that most of the underage marriages that happened took place in times of great hardship like they did in the dustbowl and after wars as girls with nothing married any young man with an income, not exactly the standard to aim for. That's not forgetting the most common reason why teens get married even today, which is "premature consummation".
None of this of course is of any value when talking about Epstein or other sex trafficking rings, they're not running some underground marriage market they're selling little girls and boys to get raped to death by monsters who wave their untouchability in your face every single fucking day that they breathe.
 
SpergRush said:
What Nick doesn't get, because he is ignorant of women, is that the issue isn't whether the women were "sexually mature", i.e., went through puberty.

The reason we have the age rules is not because it's not physically possible, or because 13 yr old girls don't think about sex or want sex. We have them as a vestige and remnant of a time when moral societies existed.

See, in virtually all ancient societies, if you took a woman's virginity, their family offered you two choices, marry her or die. Those rules were in place for 20 yr old virgins and 12 yr old virgins.

Morally, Epstein committed crimes against women who were technically of age as well, but the only crimes our society can charge him with is the ones that are illegal. Illegal is not the same as wrong. Many things which are perfectly legal will see you thrown into the lake of fire.

What Epstein did was morally reprehensible, and would still have been evil even if every girl he pimped had just turned 18.

Because he is a fake Christian, Nick misses this, and he and his followers compare Epstein's actions to child marriage.

Marrying one woman for life, taking responsibility for her permanent welfare, even if that union starts when she is legally a minor is not the same as deceiving, grooming, and then PIMPING out a HAREM of minors.

From my Christian view, there are at least 4 crimes, which even apply to the women over 18
- fornication
- entering relationship under false pretenses / sexual deception
- adultery
- pimping

Any of those are worthy of death.
Click to expand...
We're gonna pretend like it's healthy for an old nasty dude to groom a teen , take care of her financial needs and essentially replace her parents while she's still developing? Is that a world you would want to live in?

CertifiedFedBot said:
"14 and 16 are the minimum ages for marriage in canon law"
And what does this have to do with a jew pimping little white girls to pedop... sorry, "hebephiles"?

For most of European history the average age for women to get married for the first time was what today is as adults of legal age, for men it was a few years older than for women. Royal and dynastic marriages don't count because those were about dynastic politics, something that doesn't even exist today. I would hazard a guess that most of the underage marriages that happened took place in times of great hardship like they did in the dustbowl and after wars as girls with nothing married any young man with an income, not exactly the standard to aim for. That's not forgetting the most common reason why teens get married even today, which is "premature consummation".
None of this of course is of any value when talking about Epstein or other sex trafficking rings, they're not running some underground marriage market they're selling little girls and boys to get raped to death by monsters who wave their untouchability in your face every single fucking day that they breathe.
Click to expand...
There's probably some cope and enabling going cause he's catholic. A surprising amount of them don't like looking down on pedophilia too much because of all the kiddy diddling the clergy partake in . Same thing Muslims do whenever you bring up Muhammed
 
"I'm just telling the truth here... women are most fertile at 15. Not, you know, 28."

This data comes from studies done in the 1700s, where they cobbled together birth records from churches in France and from there calculated how likely women were to get pregnant at certain ages. It should go without saying that in the age of modern medicine, fertility assistance, nutrition, etc. that these archaic numbers should no longer be regurgitated. We know now that a woman's ability to get pregnant and have a healthy pregnancy peaks around age 24. Hm, a lot closer to 28 than 15. We also know that the vast majority of couples in their mid to late 30s are able to conceive within a year of trying (https://www.med.unc.edu/timetoconceive/how-long-can-you-wait-to-have-a-baby/).

What is notable is that IVF is far less successful for women in their 30s. Perhaps this is why Nick advocates for teen pregnancies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom