Lolcows that cannot be A-Logged

BILLY MAYS

Donate to MATI: http://bit.ly/MadAtTheInternet
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
A-Logging: expressing disproportionate levels of hatred for a lolcow, often including wishing them physical harm, usually for perceived "crimes" that they are "guilty" of.

Simply put, which lolcows do you think are so terrible, A-Logging them is actually considered to be a rational response?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 1 person
Simply put, which lolcows do you think are so terrible, A-Logging them is actually considered to be a rational response?
A-Logging is never acceptable but what constitutes A-Logging is very individualistic and flexible. In general, you never want to be mad at someone we have a thread on in this forum. If you're using this website and you're angry, you're using the website wrong, and should probably stop using it.

Nick Bate is a popular example of someone who "cannot be A-Logged" because he is a convicted child molester with extremely grotesque fetishes, but I would still say he can be A-Logged. If you let negative emotions stop you from having fun on the online and bawl tearfully and angrily in his thread, you're A-Logging, even though most people will probably give it a pass.
 
A-Logging is never acceptable but what constitutes A-Logging is very individualistic and flexible. In general, you never want to be mad at someone we have a thread on in this forum. If you're using this website and you're angry, you're using the website wrong, and should probably stop using it.
So like 21% of forum users?
 
null is, the more you fuck with him he'll put it up on his website so other people can mock you

hes too strong
 
I'd say anyone who "can't be A-Logged" isn't really a lolcow but usually shades over into horrorcow material, like Nick Bate. Also, whether or not you can "A-Log" him, what you can do is post low quality posts that shit up the thread.

There are also relatively repellent people like Samuel Collingwood Smith. He can still be A-Logged because his primary characteristic is still that he is a ridiculous and pathetic individual. His hare-brained schemes may be evil, but are usually comically inept.
 
If you're worked up enough to turn even remotely as autistic as the person you're sperging about, you're probably A-Logging.

Given the base level of autism for most on KF, this is fairly easy to accomplish.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Feline Darkmage
A-Logging: expressing disproportionate levels of hatred for a lolcow, often including wishing them physical harm, usually for perceived "crimes" that they are "guilty" of.

Simply put, which lolcows do you think are so terrible, A-Logging them is actually considered to be a rational response?
The better question is, why is "A-log" or "A-logging" the term? How did that come to be?
 
if you have to do it to get them to freak out, it's worth it sometimes. expressing anger in writing doesn't always represent anger in reality, and a lot of these cows respond really well to the right kind of outrage.

Tommy tooter will rant for pages if you give him a simple "she was a child you are disgusting" post. you should be having fun doing it though, I think. why else would you read or post here? if it makes comedy flow, I like a-log posts. edit: I think this is why I like the beauty parlour and horrorcows best.

it sucks when half of a thread is just people doing it with no response from the subject though. it's good only when it gets an exaggerated response.
 
Back