Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

Can we get a countdown timer for the number of days left to file? I want to watch Tommy's promise to do something tick away.

If Tom received the counter notification today and factoring in 14 business days, it'll most likely be resolved by the 2nd week in July. Of course, this is all predicated on Tommy not just filing a lawsuit but having the grounds to file the lawsuit, meaning, he needs to have a records of A) his video content holding a copyright in the state in which he lives and B) the means to file. Because he has neither, this will go nowhere and the video will most likely be reinstated.

EDIT: If he does not have a copyright on his material, then he committed perjury by filing a false DMCA which has significant criminal and financial repercussions. Also, filing a DCMA and then retroactively filing for a copyright is still committing perjury.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Tom received the counter notification today and factoring in 14 business days, it'll most likely be resolved by the 2nd week in July. Of course, this is all predicated on Tommy not just filing a lawsuit but having the grounds to file the lawsuit, meaning, he needs to have a records of A) his video content holding a copyright in the state in which he lives and B) the means to file. Because he has neither, this will go nowhere and the video will most likely be reinstated.
Tom's reactions to fair use material are funny. We need to do a lot more fan art and critique of tom's media.
 
what i did once with a slightly underaged person doesn't qualify as pedophilia

1en8jb.jpg
 
Tom doesn't have to have a registered copyright to claim copyright protection on his original work. He does, however, not get special snowflake protection against defamation from copyright law. Fair use is fair use, even with severe butthurt.

Bottom line is that reproduction for parody, commentary, and non-commercial use is pretty well covered by fair use. Ergo, and video with modifications or captions added for amusement is, by definition, fair use.
 
what is your side of this anyway? you started attacking me without provocation. can you put in writing what your beef is with me? i can't understand your speech.
let the cops do thes work ok and see who fucking who is right on this and dont i will show them your vides and post to when they come...
 
let the cops do thes work ok and see who fucking who is right on this and dont i will show them your vides and post to when they come...
there is also audio of tom threatening violence against me and my family if you need something to prove tom has a history of making violent threats.

https://track3.mixtape.moe/yqksuf.mp3 - At 3:16 he threatens to hurt me and my parents "violently"

There's also this.

upload_2017-4-5_19-7-12-png.201648
 
i can't understand your speech.

Jennfer may not speak that clearly, but she is a TRUE and HONEST transgender woman and not a vile thing like you are Thomas.

You are a man.

A crazy, ego driven little peon of a man, but still very male.

Keep fucking with Jennfer.

She already has a lawyer paid for by me because I can afford it being the "wage slave" that I am.
 
Jennfer may not speak that clearly, but she is a TRUE and HONEST transgender woman and not a vile thing like you are Thomas.

You are a man.

A crazy, ego driven little peon of a man, but still very male.

Keep fucking with Jennfer.

She already has a lawyer paid for by me because I can afford it being the "wage slave" that I am.
and i have this too to help me
IMG.jpg
 
Back