Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[Autphag]

Can't you decide to stay away on your own?

Laugh if you want. I can cross-examine two symptomal checklists from both, from which one should ideally be from that long-ass personality metric questionnaire Wildchild kept referencing (I can't remember the name) -- I'll confess that I don't know what has been used to diagnose Asperger's in recent years; there's a bit of confusion on my part as it's not in the DSM but still on the ICD -- based on my most objective experiences of her behaviour. Bet which one will have more boxes ticked?

Well at last we both agree that you can only function with gatekeeping.

Don't put words into my mouth. You're the eejit who confuses Maoist propaganda motif for a Korean one (although it did look like Kim Jong-suk, the star threw me off; they were never 'Marxists' per-se).

You wonder why I take downers, opiates, drams of alcohol here and there, and prog (which has downing and upping qualities; former mediated by GABA, latter mediated by D2-receptor activaion and thyroid-hormone upregulation) to cope with you bastards?

I'd say, none of you know what you're talking about if you ever wish to speak of my experiences of the system from anything other than your perspective; that's why Null is naive in his deferential systemic entrustment here.

I understand this is a quadruple post, but I thought I'd inform you of this: throwing 'tard wrangler org under a bus has now possibly jeopardized my potential application to the college I've applied to as they've messaged back insisting I must bring a support worker ("we would like to" is a synonym for "you must" in neurotypical female language -- I've used it in such a context myself). I've sent a lengthy correspondence in response to a brief message, it doesn't detail any pariculars, and I never sign because fictio-legis-negris and all that:

Thank you for getting back to me, I've been waiting with some anticipation and apologise for the delayed response.

The meeting is agreeable for potentially any date; we can call it next Friday if that suffices. I do have to forewarn, the availability of support workers although rota'd for this day is presently an issue of contention due to drama which has disseminated from the internet into the real world (and, to this extent, not to burden you with increasingly complicated explanations, I shan't elaborate).

My profoessional relationship with the majority of them, as it stands, is virtually non-existent, and I advise that I can carry myself on my own sufficiently, given my recent treatments for anxiety and depression and the length of time they've been in effect, and also, the extent to which I can assure you their changes in my motivation sufficient for participation in this course.

I likely foresee the outcome to be that support will be minimal if necessary at all, but I'm happy to attend: owing to the circumstances above, I have to advise that I must meet alone, as I've essentially scorned the entire organization. I've a personality disorder (Borderline) as well as autism so sometimes my interpersonal relationships are compounded double-whammy.

I sincerely hope this doesn't adversely affect the outcome of my acceptance onto the course, but I should probably inform you: I'm incredibly independent as a learner and a thinker, my support hours were minimal as they stood anyway (12 hours), and so, I don't want to jeopardize this meeting by bringing along someone (and that's, assuredly, almost all of them) with whom I have extremely poor relations to the point of resentful begrudgement, as unfortunate as that is. It would likely agitate me enough to give off an even poorer impression.

I would like a response to the extent whether these revised terms are agreeable, and apologise in advance for the seeming imposition. I've tried to phrase this as politely, if sternly and unambiguously, as possible.

E-mail headers removed to protect college staff and location, also, to make less embarassing I'm too broke as fuck to fund something as simple as deed-poll, if Fareal is honest about the nature of guardianships.

I think I was as reasonable, persuasive, and articulate as I would like to think I am, especially by what is equivalent to a basement-bin community college (for you yanks) standards. But they might nevertheless hold obstinately to their insistence and if that's the case, that's another year lost of a potential academic opportunity.

Some, not all of what Null has said, has begun to take context, the problem is, for as sincere as he might've been, he just doesn't know the predicament of my introspection well enough. Few could. I've been trying for years, to a barely-satisfactory end in only my latest years.

@Null, accept my apologies for any rancour I might've caused by not taking state assistance as you see it. In my experience the impositional and institutional model has worked only dentrimentally, and the care in the community shit they play with Autism Initiatives barely works any better either. Like Robert Lindsay (Beyond High Brow fame) said: although debarred, in his practice he refuses to treat personality disorders, tells them to fuck off and considers them write-offs.

 

[Begemot]

Interesting.
The idea of Lagoona being a freak ewon;t work here, though. Sorry.

 

[Cuntster]

I don't want to jeopardize this meeting by bringing along someone (and that's, assuredly, almost all of them) with whom I have extremely poor relations to the point of resentful begrudgement, as unfortunate as that is.

Anyone reading this will consider that sentence a massive, massive red flag.

 

[Autphag]

Interesting.
The idea of Lagoona being a freak ewon;t work here, though. Sorry.

I'm aware you're matriarchally-deferential; it isn't going to dissuade me from arguing.

 

[Begemot]

I'm aware you're matriarchally-deferential; it isn't going to dissuade me from arguing.

What are you basing that from? Is this the same way you accused me of being a Catholic and a Neo-Con? Lagoona was far too nice to you.

 

[Vorhtbame]

You wonder why I take downers, opiates, drams of alcohol here and there, and prog (which has downing and upping qualities; former mediated by GABA, latter mediated by D2-receptor activaion and thyroid-hormone upregulation) to cope with you bastards?

Or you could skip all that and just...

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Autphag is a good reason why the mentally insane should be locked up indefinitely instead of releasing them back into the wild because they show even the slightest bit of progress.

 

[Autphag]

What are you basing that from? Is this the same way you accused me of being a Catholic and a Neo-Con? Lagoona was far too nice to you.

She's a woman. Not all matriarchal processes are institutionally ingrained. Some are just social conventions taken far too stupidly. Positively prejudicing Lagoona as inherently nice is just beyond beggar's belief given what I'm able to see behind the "innocent little girl" act.

Also I see Cuntster has co-opted Kim Jong-suk to make some shitty point about "identity-grasping". Well, yes, that's honestly the only extent to which this has ever happened out of the two of us. Kim Jong-suk is my motif; you're even further away from the racial make-up of it than I am.

I can see Anonymus' intellect has now surpassed itself, debasing yourself to the same dumb-rating faggotry Cuntster had tried to back-seat with for a while as if it's equivalent to airing a well-substantiated opinion.

Yes, it's the rating I have a problem with; it's the fact that the rating serves a virtue signal for lazies that can't coherently address my remarks and resort to dismissing them as insane as cop-outs.

So yes, keep rating dumb, in that meaninglessly cathartic manner of yours, do that redundant exercise whilst actually forming a response (reasonable middle ground), or, drop the pretense altogether, James, and just go retire and fuck off somewhere.

Yeah, please. I hate you, and I hate your unreconciliatory ways. I'm hurt by them and can never forgive the 'tard wrangler caucus.

It certainly belies you to show these mid-witted slacktavisticological shit-posting and junk-retorts, but perhaps if you were able to challenge yourself, I might respect you more seriously enough to engage you in the sort of intrigue I doubt you'd even handle anyway.

 

[Autphag]

Yes, it's not the rating*

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I can see Anonymus' intellect has now surpassed itself, debasing yourself to the same dumb-rating faggotry Cuntster had tried to back-seat with for a while as if it's equivalent to airing a well-substantiated opinion.

Yes, it's the rating I have a problem with; it's the fact that the rating serves a virtue signal for lazies that can't coherently address my remarks and resort to dismissing them as insane as cop-outs.

So yes, keep rating dumb, in that meaninglessly cathartic manner of yours, do that redundant exercise whilst actually forming a response (reasonable middle ground), or, drop the pretense altogether, James, and just go retire and fuck off somewhere.

Yeah, please. I hate you, and I hate your unreconciliatory ways. I'm hurt by them and can never forgive the 'tard wrangler caucus.

It certainly belies you to show these mid-witted slacktavisticological shit-posting and junk-retorts, but perhaps if you were able to challenge yourself, I might respect you more seriously enough to engage you in the sort of intrigue I doubt you'd even handle anyway.

Did I hurt your feelings again Autphag with a simple rating? Go on, cry some more. I like it when lolcows can give us more content. You exist only for us to laugh at you.

 

[Cuntster]

Also I see Cuntster has co-opted Kim Jong-suk to make some shitty point about "identity-grasping". Well, yes, that's honestly the only extent to which this has ever happened out of the two of us. Kim Jong-suk is my motif; you're even further away from the racial make-up of it than I am.

I just think the picture is funny looking.

 

[Autphag]

I just think the picture is funny looking.

Inverse-racialist to Mongoloid women now, I see?

Yeah, your true scumminess and jealousy comes out, hypermasculine negroid. That's a physiologically low-DHT, high-T female face of the supreme systematizing racial archetype and you're jealous of its symmetries.

Did I hurt your feelings again Autphag with a simple rating? Go on, cry some more. I like it when lolcows can give us more content. You exist only for us to laugh at you.

Re-read the correction. That wasn't subconscious; I frequently have benzo STM-loss induced omitted words as of late.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I just think the picture is funny looking.

Autphag is too far gone in his insanity to understand that. It's like Oliver and Vordrak not understanding the reason why I first posted avatars of cat's that looked like Hitler, or one in front of a Nazi Swastika or even the Meow avatar.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

Aut, tell us more about Ginger. How long did things last with her? What was the last time you talked to her?

 

[Autphag]

Aut, tell us more about Ginger. How long did things last with her? What was the last time you talked to her?

two days ago, she's simply charming and frankly far more intelligent than Lagoona; Lagoona got 112 on a previous generation of the Weschler scale which would be ~95 now revised, Ginger has been precociously gifted since youth, in the almost-but-not-quite-a-genius range. Out of respect, I'm keeping it to myself, but she did give me the full psychometric profile via. scan a few years back.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

Do I hear wedding bells?

 

[Autphag]

Do I hear wedding bells?

She's a suppressed lesbian and now engaged to a man believing in its (lesbianism's) inherent abhorrence.

It was a notion I understood well.

No. It's not even an affair at this juncture, I was just happy I had somebody trustworthy and who appreciates my vantage points from a logical rather than an impassive-pseudointellectual position.

Lagoona is only any bright by Scottish standards, just. Ginger is a true Amero-Aspergian of close to the highest caliber. My own WAIS isn't anything to write home about as I've said before but we've too similarities:

• Our verbal reasoning scores are pretty close to each other.
• Our Raven's diverge but not very significantly and not nearly as significantly as the others.
• She too has comparatively poor vocabulary to her reasoning, although hers is still slightly above the mean.

So of course I'd get on better than this in-born philosopher than a systematically hack-inculcated literary sperg like Lagoona.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

No one would willingly go out with an autist who's in and out of a mental institute.

 

[Autphag]

No one would willingly go out with an autist who's in and out of a mental institute.

I've been to medium security for cumulatively less than 3 weeks, and low-security for less than 3 months, in a lifetime, and all those instances are fairly far apart overall, although a few were clustered in '14.

I'm not exactly the type who has been chronically untreatably schizophrenic for 10s of years with only 3 months of freedom to their name.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

She's a suppressed lesbian and now engaged to a man believing in its (lesbianism's) inherent abhorrence...

Lagoona is only any bright by Scottish standards, just.

The world's most cunning linguist, ladies and gentlemen.