Russell Greer vs. Viatron Corporation, A-26-937678-C

Useful_Mistake said:
Russ spends much time talking about how Geoff's words caused him fear and anxiety, but he seems to forgetten to include a few VITAL elements in surviving an IIED claim. Hint hint, ViaTRON told him about one.
Click to expand...
He SAID he is willing to EXPLAIN that, if you would just stop mischaracterizing his GOOD FAITH claims and go straight to a jury!

1772458462139.png

That reminds me:
1772460400789.png

He already claimed OSHA and EEOC filings, the arbitration is probably that $100 packet he sent in December. Has he mentioned actually filing with NERC before? That's the Nevada Equal Rights Commission, and I don't see it mentioned in the main thread. In his main complaint and exhibits, he mentions potentially filing with them, but not actually filing. It's an official NV agency, so certain FOIA-reading persons may be interested; I am tempted to click that Public Records Request link at the top of their page, but I wouldn't want to be accused of harassing a 3rd party...

Instead I clicked through their online complaint form, and look at the very first question of their Pre-screening:

1772461473501.png

Well, Russ isn't going to let a little thing like the law stop him from spraying his plights all over the state! From his Exhibit AA, "Plaintiff Saying He Never Resigned" (Nov 24, 2025):

1772462099971.png

If he had filed something with them then, I'm sure he would've said it then, but he only says they are "well aware". Now he's saying there are "filings" with all 3 agencies. Curious.
 
Harvey Danger said:
That's the Nevada Equal Rights Commission, and I don't see it mentioned in the main thread. In his main complaint and exhibits, he mentions potentially filing with them, but not actually filing. It's an official NV agency, so certain FOIA-reading persons may be interested; I am tempted to click that Public Records Request link at the top of their page, but I wouldn't want to be accused of harassing a 3rd party...
Click to expand...
NERC won't give you shit. From a records request a year back:
Screenshot_20260302_150031_Firefox.jpg
Harvey Danger said:
He SAID he is willing to EXPLAIN that, if you would just stop mischaracterizing his GOOD FAITH claims and go straight to a jury!
Click to expand...
Well, the evidence has to be provided at the Motion to Dismiss stage in regards to IIED. No IIED claim survived a MtD by allegations and description alone.
 
I hope this case somehow survives so that Greer can once again go through discovery so they can potentially subpeona everyone that Hardin said he would subpeona.
 
.iota. said:
well, well, well, it seems that the word "bizarrely" has a challenger:
View attachment 8638392
View attachment 8638415

View attachment 8638526
way to completely miss the point, greee. viatron is not arguing litigation privilege because they were discussing this litigation, they're arguing for litigation privilege because they were discussing how to proceed against your extortionate demands and threats in october. this is yet another instance of greee's feigned and intentional ignorance of the facts.

View attachment 8638554
View attachment 8638588
this is absurd. plaintiff plaintiff greee most certainly does have an "extensive troubling legal history". i sincerely hope that viatron responds to this assertion with a multi-page manifest of all of greee's litigation. it's happened before ... :tomgirl:

View attachment 8638607
random.txt

View attachment 8638635
:story::story::story:
Click to expand...
One of the many things that gets me about Greep's filings is the abundance of adjectives in them. It comes off to me as an appeal to emotion rather than logic. It's kind of a no-no in technical/professional writing in my wheelhouse.
A long time ago when we were beginning to learn to read/write research-level articles, one of the standouts to me was that adjectives are deadly in science. Never use adjectives to describe something rational and objective. The facts and data should speak for themselves and make perfect sense to a qualified party. I would think the same applies to law-talkin' folks.

Maybe there's overlap between writing science vs. law, or maybe very little. But this "magically" "bizarrely" "easily" "obviously" etc. It's the equivalent of "just trust me bro." If you had sound data and reasoning you don't need to try and sell it.
 
Useful_Mistake said:
NERC won't give you shit. From a records request a year back:
Click to expand...
I'm guessing that includes the mere existence of a filed complaint too. Oh well, Viatron will have to do it for us (as a party to the complaint), if their MtD fails.

Still curious about those filing timings. Depending on when Russ pulled the trigger and what he included, he could get in trouble for them.
 
Last edited:
the khat quaffer said:
I would think the same applies to law-talkin' folks.
Click to expand...
Hyperbolic and inflammatory rhetoric shows up in lawsuits, and not just ones from vexlits that hate Null.

For example this:

OKeefe-Counterclaim-Intro.PNG

Is an unredacted, unedited excerpt from James O'Keefe's countersuit against Project Veritas. Is there anything demonstrably false in there? So far as I can tell, no. Legally speaking does it achieve more than just 'James O'Keefe founded Project Veritas, Project Veritas ultimately fired him, this decision was not only unwise but actionable'? Also no.

IANAL but I suspect it's because most high profile litigation has a PR/public opinion side as well, putting TV/radio ready excerpts into the court filings would help with that.

Russ is probably not smart enough to think in terms of media-friendly excerpts, he just knows that the litigation privilege immunizes his filings from nearly all suits/countersuits and probably learned from infancy that crying to authority figures would get him what he wanted.
 
Useful_Mistake said:
Russ spends much time talking about how Geoff's words caused him fear and anxiety, but he seems to forgetten to include a few VITAL elements in surviving an IIED claim. Hint hint, ViaTRON told him about one.
Click to expand...
Wasn't there some earlier lawsuit that could ONLY proceed if "fear and anxiety" was caused, and since he had to pull that out of his ass for that one, he now pulls it out of ChatGPT for every one going forward?

Also I'm more interested in watching Russ survive an IED but that's just me.
 
Prokhor Zakharov said:
If Rusty did nothing wrong, what reason does he have to fear law enforcement?
Click to expand...
I’m going to rephrase that question in a way that Russ should be familiar with from his childhood: by using the Bible.

IMG_1278.png

:thinking:

That’s a whole lot of different ways to ask Russ why he’s fleeing from the law, from his responsibilities, from his church, from his family… and also why he thinks everyone who looks at him cross-eyed obviously hates the disabled.

Perhaps “anon” should start sending him Bible quotes instead of Hitlers. I suspect that would actually bother him more.
 
the khat quaffer said:
One of the many things that gets me about Greep's filings is the abundance of adjectives in them. It comes off to me as an appeal to emotion rather than logic. It's kind of a no-no in technical/professional writing in my wheelhouse.
Click to expand...

the khat quaffer said:
But this "magically" "bizarrely" "easily" "obviously" etc. It's the equivalent of "just trust me bro." If you had sound data and reasoning you don't need to try and sell it.
Click to expand...

These are adverbs, as they modify a verb to describe an action. I agree with your sentiment, but if we're going to start nitpicking on that, we might as well use the correct terminology.
 
I like how Crusty, in his Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, seems to think he can demand a jury trial NOW, NOW, NOW!! I guess he forgot about all those stages that one needs to go through before reaching a jury. It's understandable, since every lawsuit he has filed has failed to reach that stage, with the furthest he has ever gone is discovery in Greer v KiwiFarms, a website, and he has made that a complete shit show.

It's funny to think that Greeee believes a jury will shower him with money if he can just EXPLAIN his plights and that he isn't blackmailing and extorting Viatron. It's hard to believe he thinks a jury will even understand him at all. I guess he doesn't realize how greasy, moist, and disgusting he appears to regular humans.
 
Prokhor Zakharov said:
I like how Crusty, in his Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, seems to think he can demand a jury trial NOW, NOW, NOW!! I guess he forgot about all those stages that one needs to go through before reaching a jury. It's understandable, since every lawsuit he has filed has failed to reach that stage, with the furthest he has ever gone is discovery in Greer v KiwiFarms, a website, and he has made that a complete shit show.

It's funny to think that Greeee believes a jury will shower him with money if he can just EXPLAIN his plights and that he isn't blackmailing and extorting Viatron. It's hard to believe he thinks a jury will even understand him at all. I guess he doesn't realize how greasy, moist, and disgusting he appears to regular humans.
Click to expand...
He learned from Greer vs Moon that if he stamps his feet enough about how unfair it is that he has to pay money during discovery that the judge will put it on hold forever. Or maybe he just forgot that discovery is a thing.

He could be hoping that if this somehow survives the motion to dismiss that Viatron will just settle rather than spend tens of thousands on lawyers to deal with this like Null has had to.
 
FamicomGorby said:
He learned from Greer vs Moon that if he stamps his feet enough about how unfair it is that he has to pay money during discovery that the judge will put it on hold forever. Or maybe he just forgot that discovery is a thing.

He could be hoping that if this somehow survives the motion to dismiss that Viatron will just settle rather than spend tens of thousands on lawyers to deal with this like Null has had to.
Click to expand...

I can almost guarantee, at this point, Viatron would rather set $200,000 on fire and piss on the fire to put it out rather than Greeee one red cent.

Also, he shouldn't bet on all judges being retarded like in the GreeePT Vs. KiwiOrchard case, it's a bad bet. I'm willing to bet these judges are the exception, not the rule.
 
I’m so confused by the AI failing to make the formatting consistent across all of the sub-parts of GreePT’s response to the MTD. The outline format isn’t the same throughout. Some subsections just have bullet points without numbering/lettering. Some bullet points are there not as headers, but as parts of a paragraph. Does he have to do a series of prompts to get all the arguments he needs, and then doesn’t fix the formatting before filing? Does he run out of free access tokens and has to wait for more to refresh, by which time the AI forgets his preferred formatting?

His continuing pattern of Schrödinger’s Truth also pisses me off. It’s a contract, until he needs more money. It’s a promise, until he was offering to negotiate. It’s wages, but paid for time off when he wasn’t working. None of what he says makes for a coherent narrative, no matter how many chatbots he put this through.
 
cromit said:
I’m so confused by the AI failing to make the formatting consistent across all of the sub-parts of GreePT’s response to the MTD. The outline format isn’t the same throughout. Some subsections just have bullet points without numbering/lettering. Some bullet points are there not as headers, but as parts of a paragraph. Does he have to do a series of prompts to get all the arguments he needs, and then doesn’t fix the formatting before filing? Does he run out of free access tokens and has to wait for more to refresh, by which time the AI forgets his preferred formatting?

His continuing pattern of Schrödinger’s Truth also pisses me off. It’s a contract, until he needs more money. It’s a promise, until he was offering to negotiate. It’s wages, but paid for time off when he wasn’t working. None of what he says makes for a coherent narrative, no matter how many chatbots he put this through.
Click to expand...
That’s a problem with AI in general, there isn’t necessarily any attempt at cohesion between individual sentences or paragraphs. They’ve gotten a lot better at maintaining internal consistency, just look at what was typical just 7-10 years ago.

IMG_1296.jpeg

Basically computers don’t think. They regurgitate, they can only regurgitate what they’ve been taught about. This is why they hallucinate, they understand the parts of a case citation, but they don’t understand it or why it’s important.
 
cromit said:
Does he have to do a series of prompts to get all the arguments he needs, and then doesn’t fix the formatting before filing?
Click to expand...

I can almost guarantee this is it. You have to limit how much you ask the AI to do at once, otherwise it starts condensing things because it has a hard-coded time limit of how long it is allowed to spend on something for people that are non-enterprise or non-top tier consumer (for Google the top consumer tier is $200 a month and it still comes with daily limits) model users.
 
Prokhor Zakharov said:
I can almost guarantee this is it. You have to limit how much you ask the AI to do at once, otherwise it starts condensing things because it has a hard-coded time limit of how long it is allowed to spend on something for people that are non-enterprise or non-top tier consumer (for Google the top consumer tier is $200 a month and it still comes with daily limits) model users.
Click to expand...
I'm also sure he keeps modifying prompts for parts until he gets what we wants, and then mashes it all together.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom