Wizchan / Assigned Male Accidental Merger

Move to Lolcow Subforum?


  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Women that resent men become lesbians/asexuals, adopt cats, and blog on Tumblr.

This sounds eerily like my life...

Now that I think about it, it seems more socially acceptable for a woman to die without ever having sex. Like if you have a 25 year old female virgin it doesn't seem as awkward as a 25 year old male virgin. I wonder why.

Society generally expects guys to live up to some exalted image of manliness, and while it used to be a little more specific, these days you can easily pass by being successful in some way, not showing emotional weakness, and scoring some poon-tang. If you don't live up to this at least partially you're seen as less of a man, often being compared to a woman, and there are very few things in western culture that are considered more insulting than a man being likened to a woman (although less so these days).
 
Now that I think about it, it seems more socially acceptable for a woman to die without ever having sex. Like if you have a 25 year old female virgin it doesn't seem as awkward as a 25 year old male virgin. I wonder why.

It may be because of some misguided theory of "purity" and how a woman being a virgin is seen to some conservatively minded people as somehow superior to a woman who has relationships and sex outside of marriage. A pretty stupid mindset but quite prevalent still.

There's the whole crazy catlady, old lonely spinster stereotype that still is a thing. And having frequented retirement homes to visit elderly relatives I can tell it's true in a way, because many of such elderly spinsters are no less lonely then an aging bachelor. Their friends around them all die or become immobile and unable to visit, and with no children or grandchildren to visit them they kind of wither away and cling at any human contact they can get.

In the end for both genders to die without ever having sex is not exactly a phenomenon that society views kindly. And in a way it makes sense because sex is pretty fucking awesome and to live eight or nine decades without ever experiencing it seems like a rather miserable way to spend a life. I don't believe in any of that no-sex-before-marriage bullshit and women who have sex aren't any less pure then men having sex. It's a fun activity to engage in, and people should never be ashamed to do so. Whatever goes on between two consenting adults having a good time, I think should be celebrated and embraced as long as it's not, say, furry deviancy or what-have-you.

There's this old saying, "always the bridesmaid, never the bride". I don't think for a woman to die a virgin is and ever has been truly respected, unless perhaps in certain religious cultures if she joined an order or took a vow. In most cases it is frowned upon for both genders to never get any.

Society generally expects guys to live up to some exalted image of manliness, and while it used to be a little more specific, these days you can easily pass by being successful in some way, not showing emotional weakness, and scoring some poon-tang. If you don't live up to this at least partially you're seen as less of a man, often being compared to a woman, and there are very few things in western culture that are considered more insulting than a man being likened to a woman (although less so these days).

People who live their lives according to what society demands of them, or what they think demands of them, will wind up being miserable more often then not. People should do things because they want to do things, not someone else. It's quite a weight off your shoulders to realize this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It may be because of some misguided theory of "purity" and how a woman being a virgin is seen to some conservatively minded people as somehow superior to a woman who has relationships and sex outside of marriage. A pretty stupid mindset but quite prevalent still.
The loveshy mindset provides a pretty concrete answer to this question... a loveshy believe a woman is supposed to give her china to him and only him, because if she can get sex elsewhere, it means she might not be totally dependent on him. It really just is about possession, and the childishness of the loveshy strips away much of the flare that would otherwise obscure this fact.
 
I love loveshy/wizard arguments because absolutely every one of them can be perfectly gender-flipped.

For example, the way these guys objectify women and only seem to want the 11/10 nympho that Michael Bay puts in his films, it's pretty damn obvious that even if they got a girlfriend, they would toss her in a heartbeat if they thought they had a chance at someone "better". Yet we're supposed to sympathize with them because women are the shallow ones.
...?
If you look at wizardchan, most of users say that they just want someone on their level of (un)attractiveness, not 11/10. Sure, there are people who want only 10/10 but that's caused by being mad about the fact that even 1/10 girl can get 7/10 boyfriend. But still most of wizardchan users would just be happy with having someone who loves them and enjoys watching chinese cartoons with them, or whatever they want to do together.

So on the flip side, does this mean that men too are meant to find one girlfriend and stick with her forever or get nobody after that?
Yes.
Even if you end up being terribly unhappy in the relationship?
If it's something like your man or your woman suddenly changes his/her character to the point where s/he's acting like different person and makes you unhappy then sure, there is no point in staying with that person.
But if someone ends relationship because for example she wants someone who looks better the it's just being a slut.
And what if the girl was left by the guy? Does that still make her a 'slut?'
No. But this:
If the guy left her, it's clearly her fault for choosing an alpha jerk.
is often true.
 
is often true.

You do realise that some people are fucking lying gits right? It is possible for people to be very convincing liars and manipulative fucks. Both myself and my boyfriend have monster exes. They were both abusive individuals... eventually. They were both extremely charming when we met them and they'd both done research to make sure that what we saw was appealing.

My bf's monster ex had invented a kind of damsel persona. She had terrible family tragedies and all kinds of repressed skills and talents. Writing it so simply makes it sound obvious but she was anything but. It was only after they had split up over her repeatedly breaking promises that her utter batshit craziness was made apparent. Lies unravelled like a badly knitted sweater and my bf felt a horrendous mixture of emotions including extreme humiliation at having believed her.

My monster ex was equally full of bullshit. Had all kinds of hobbies, interests and musical tastes that slowly disappeared as time went on. His behaviour turned abusive very, very slowly. By the time it was obvious you feel like a moron but it's still hard to fathom that someone would do something so weird that you're fighting disbelief. I also have mental health issues and he found it super easy to tell those around me that I was crazy and cut off all help from outside. Stuff and things that depress the shit out of people and he's gone and I'm doing way better (cause people who aren't fucked up Love-shies don't get their rocks off to people being abused.)

They were both cunts, both liars and both treated my bf and myself like we were objects. It can happen to anyone especially when you are young. Everyone is naive at some point and some people are predators just waiting to find someone vulnerable.

Are we both sluts for having "jerks" for exes or is it just me because I'm the female?
 
And in Gentleman Elliot's case, possibly schizophrenia.


So, even the ones that disapprove of his actions only do so because he was a tool? Not because he was a murderer?

Elliot's delusions in a nutshell:
8U48yV1.jpg
 
even 1/10 girl can get 7/10 boyfriend
No. No they can't. A girl can go out and get some guy at a bar to sleep with her more easily than a guy can. He's not gonna wake her up with breakfast in bed the next morning and then bring her flowers and ask her on a date. So if that's your standard for "getting" a partner, that's pretty sad.

If it's something like your man or your woman suddenly changes his/her character to the point where s/he's acting like different person and makes you unhappy then sure, there is no point in staying with that person.
But if someone ends relationship because for example she wants someone who looks better the it's just being a slut.
What is your basis for expecting what relationships should and shouldn't be if you have no experience being in one? Relationships end for more reasons than just "I found someone better looking".

For example, let's say a girl starts dating a guy, but then realizes he thinks of their relationship as adversarial, he's really only with her because she's the "hottest" girl he could get, and she realizes she feels very insulted and angered by the incredible degree of of patronization and disrespect he heaps on her just for being a woman. Would "I found a guy who doesn't have such a dogshit personality" be a good reason for dumping his ass? Or would that make her a slut too?

If you say you really just want companionship, I'll believe you, though honestly you still need to reevaluate whatever scale you use for measuring people's worth because putting people on a 1-10 scale is just ridiculous. But a lot of these wizards and loveshies and whatever they want to call themselves are a lot more goddamned childish and narcissistic and share a lot of the same entitlement bullshit that Gentleman Elliot had.

Are we both sluts for having "jerks" for exes or is it just me because I'm the female?
Oh, it's clearly just you.

Christ, loveshies are so obsessed with demanding a level of respect that they very deliberately want to deny to everyone else. And don't anyone tell me that "women have life easier so they don't deserve as much sympathy". A group of people whose primary defining characteristic is that they are too afraid to interact with women in any regular or intimate way is the LAST group who should be claiming knowledge about how women's minds work.
 
Last edited:
Not to feed the trolls in any way, but sometimes women are dumped by men. I'm just saying. Odd, I know, but true. Women are not always the ones using the big red REJECTED stamp to end a relationship. How about that.

Also, "toilet spiders" are not a thing.
 
Enlightening thread about being short: http://wizardchan.org/v9k/res/98279.html

One of my best friends has to be around 5'3". He's extremely squat and a bit chubby and cargo shorts go past his knees. Also super nerdy about gaming and anime and all that stuff. Got laid and lost dat v-card his first year of college and made a ton of friends in the process.

>reading cute fluffy doujinshi about loving couple
>can't Feel because guy is tall and I'm practically a manlet (5''7), and won't ever be able to have that kind of effect on a girl
Fuck you wizardchan, I used to be happy.

I don't have a problem with my height at 5'3. You need to stop believing in that /fit/ stuff. It is not like being taller is going to get you laid. Most of us have many qualities that lead us to be, who we are now.

I still hate living in this world though. I wish it had the smoothness of the anime world. Fuck all the texture and depth of this world. I hate going outside.

3D sluts aren't like muh Lovely Complex. :'(

there is a way to win; it's called being alpha as fuck. For me and for most people on this site it's personality that doesn't allow them to be a winner

Personality is something beyond what we can change

That last quote is enlightening. Something tells me the posters here would go to the trouble of having experimental plastic surgery to lengthen their legs a foot before trying to elevate their personalities beyond >tfw succubi won't worship my manlet dick ;__;.
 
Something tells me the posters here would go to the trouble of having experimental plastic surgery to lengthen their legs a foot before trying to elevate their personalities beyond >tfw succubi won't worship my manlet dick ;__;.
The idea of not feeling sorry for themselves is not acceptable to most of these people.
 
The idea of not feeling sorry for themselves is not acceptable to most of these people.

Well, experimental surgery exists for penis size, but not height, I don't think...man, people are so weird.

I honestly couldn't give a fuck about the height of any potential partners.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pina Colada
And in Gentleman Elliot's case, possibly schizophrenia.


So, even the ones that disapprove of his actions only do so because he was a tool? Not because he was a murderer?

He was at the very least confused about himself and what he wanted.

As far as the wizards go, they don't give a shit about the victims either. One level 30 magic user called them "a bunch of vapid whores and Chads." I don't remember a whole lot of disagreement among them on that one.
 
One of the reasons why loveshies, wizards and so on haven't gotten more attention after the shooting may be that they're so separate from one another, which is no surprise. Which got me thinking - is there a single term that applies to all of those kinds of people? The ideal term would apply only to them and apply to all of them more or less equally.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back