- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
A question for some of the military spergs here. What realistic strategic and tactical options were available to the Iranian military, faced with their overwhelming quantitative and qualitative inferiority, and the unpopularity of the regime? If any of you had been commander-in-chief of Iran, and had not been killed by either the US or Israel, and you couldn't surrender or defect, and your task was to do the best you could to "win" the war, however you define it, what would you have done? I'm asking in part because I'm not really seeing a lot of options, and I'm also not seeing that the options the Iranians are choosing are particularly helpful to whatever their endgame is. Attacking Azerbaijan? How does that help? Is their strategy just to take out as many of their enemy as they can on the way down? Or do they have something better in mind?
Their only strategic option was to stop pissing off America by financing and arming Shiite militias to attack global shipping and Israel. Since they refused to do that, their next option was unconditional surrender. They refused to do that. Their final option is annihilation. They're attacking random neighbors because they were hoping that they'd all say, "Oh no, America, you're pissing off Iran, please stop!" Instead, they're saying, "WTF, Iran really is run by psychos. America, please destroy them."
They have no tactical options to win the war because America isn't trying to hold ground.
Last edited:




