You're either genuinely retarded or pretending to be. "AI" simply does not exist.
I'm not sure who's the retarded out of you two tbh. @grok, can you help me decide?
I have heard how black people talk about ai. I am entirely unsurprised. I have overheard black people talk about ai in a way I can only describe as biblical. The whole critical thinking and checking what it says or does for some reasons seems to be overlooked. For whatever reason. It's just a magical box that does what you tell it to 100% of the time perfectly. It's like boomers but without the distrust that they have for all technology.
'I don't have money to edit or format my book' ok? Nigger fucking do it yourself then? You let a complete random retard from the internet do your work for you and are surprised that it's not to a professional level? If that's even what happened.
That's literally the reason it's called artificial intelligence? That's kinda what the word means. Ai is not intelligence, that is why it is not called intelligence. It is called artificial intelligence because it is a man made version designed to mimic the natural version as best we can.
The point:
DLSS 5 is ugly as shit (looks like you're playing with a Midjourney filter on) and IMO it's the wrong approach to AI generated graphics in gaming, after all, why can't studios just generate the assets themselves and package on the game? The response to it however is completely batshit insane, people are swatting each other over it and I really don't understand why.
Not to defend DLSS5 (I don't care about it either way), but they can't simply do this because it's more than raw assets. It simulates models with more polys than are feasible to render, texturing at arbitrarily high resolutions, shaders that do perfect skin, animation potentially more subtle than most animators build. Basically simulating real life because it's trained from real life/live video. It kind of enables much lazier development, devs wouldn't need to generate good models and textures if they could just rely on DLSS5 to make them good for them. Presumably you could make a game out of shitty wireframe figures and tell DLSS5 what they're actually supposed to look like and it does all that work for you. Of course, they still can't do that because not everyone would have access to the feature or would want to play with it off. but that's the far off dream, I suppose.
Can you give me examples of good AI generated videos if you have any? Throw in a real video too and don't tell me what it is. I can buy pictures fooling me but genuinely every AI video I've seen has been obvious (weird audio quality, very specific Definitely Not-Human way it structures most sentences, physics being incorrect at times, backgrounds being writhe-y and just Really Fucking Weird, etc. etc.). I'm just curious tbh
That's kinda like asking why games can't run at 60fps instead of running at 30 boosted to 60 with dlss 4. Yea it'd be great if the thing that I pay a week's worth of wages for would run at a stable and not painful framerate and would have models and assets made to a high quality standard. But expecting that from any game that will be supported by dlss is just delusional considering the history of the games industry.
In the words of Terry A Davis. 'If you don't want to go for realism you can go for better than realism'. I don't want a realistic video. I have a phone camera and the ability to go outside. I cannot go outside and film some trippy shape store full of wacky niggers doing shit. The best use of ai video generation is to make things that you would not be able to make otherwise, shit like that is never going to look realistic because it's just not real.
When it's used as an additional tool (rather than just making media wholesale from prompts) to do stuff, I find the results very satisfactory.
This has no SOVL, this is vantablack brimstone straight from the depths of niggerhell, obtained by the brownest of nusois, born in Lesotho.
Unlike a lot of AI stuff, I can imagine the guy who made it wanting the piece to turn out exactly like this if he had to do it the old-fashioned way. Which I can't say for stuff like the Will Stancil cartoons. (I'd much rather Emily explore her original idea of using the AI for inbetweens rather than just generating the whole thing from scratch.)
These people will claim to soycott AI and then gladly slurp it down in their daily life without realizing it anyway.
what the fuck. this cant be real, can it? theres no way. surely if it was real someone wouldve told me. this cant be happening
Gladly?