AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
"Stop calling them first person shooters, last I checked Master Chief isn't literally the first person to ever exist, in fact there are so many of these games, they can't all actually feature the very first person!!! Stop using the phrase FPS!"
 
"Stop calling them first person shooters, last I checked Master Chief isn't literally the first person to ever exist, in fact there are so many of these games, they can't all actually feature the very first person!!! Stop using the phrase FPS!"
You're either genuinely retarded or pretending to be. "AI" simply does not exist.
 
You're either genuinely retarded or pretending to be. "AI" simply does not exist.
I'm not sure who's the retarded out of you two tbh. @grok, can you help me decide?

Anyway, since AI has a habit of hallucination, you could turn that disadvantage into an asset by making it write a plot to the tune of Axe Cop. Something for little kids, all that insanity of pulling totally out-of-context shit out of your ass would be something a 5yo find fun, I imagine.
 
I have heard how black people talk about ai. I am entirely unsurprised. I have overheard black people talk about ai in a way I can only describe as biblical. The whole critical thinking and checking what it says or does for some reasons seems to be overlooked. For whatever reason. It's just a magical box that does what you tell it to 100% of the time perfectly. It's like boomers but without the distrust that they have for all technology.
the author apparently replied to the video
'I don't have money to edit or format my book' ok? Nigger fucking do it yourself then? You let a complete random retard from the internet do your work for you and are surprised that it's not to a professional level? If that's even what happened.
"AI" does not exist because a computer will never be intelligent
That's literally the reason it's called artificial intelligence? That's kinda what the word means. Ai is not intelligence, that is why it is not called intelligence. It is called artificial intelligence because it is a man made version designed to mimic the natural version as best we can.
 
You're either genuinely retarded or pretending to be. "AI" simply does not exist.
The point:

Words mean different things in different contexts. The whole point of language is to communicate something that others will understand. When people say "I used AI to make this," literally everyone knows what that means. They don't say "oh but technically is it intelligence?! I'm not really sure what you were trying to say by that, since artificial intelligence doesn't exist!"

Going to war against definitions has always been pointless and a lost battle. AI is what everyone understands it to be.
 
His cussing this much is actually out of character of him, since his channel is normally... normal.
There is a bit of wholesomeness, but otherwise normal.
DLSS 5 is ugly as shit (looks like you're playing with a Midjourney filter on) and IMO it's the wrong approach to AI generated graphics in gaming, after all, why can't studios just generate the assets themselves and package on the game? The response to it however is completely batshit insane, people are swatting each other over it and I really don't understand why.
 
>Traditional Art in le big [insert current year]? Pffffffft! The future is now old man. Just embrace the fact that digital art is le current thing. And there is no such thing as “degenerate” art you chud! Trad art is so boring and takes time anyways
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!1!11! I CANT BELIEVES LE EVIL HECKIN’ AI IS LITERALLY REPLACING MEEEEEEEEEE!1!1!1! I CANT BELIEVE AI TAKES ONLY 0.000001 SECONDS TO MAKE ART WHILE I HAVE TO SPEND 37482937383 HOURS TO MAKE MY GAY TRANNY VORE FART FAT FETISH ART!1!11!1! BOYCOTT AI1!1!1! SUPPORT REAL ARTISTS1!1!!11!1!

they are 100% like this btw
 
why can't studios just generate the assets themselves and package on the game?
Not to defend DLSS5 (I don't care about it either way), but they can't simply do this because it's more than raw assets. It simulates models with more polys than are feasible to render, texturing at arbitrarily high resolutions, shaders that do perfect skin, animation potentially more subtle than most animators build. Basically simulating real life because it's trained from real life/live video. It kind of enables much lazier development, devs wouldn't need to generate good models and textures if they could just rely on DLSS5 to make them good for them. Presumably you could make a game out of shitty wireframe figures and tell DLSS5 what they're actually supposed to look like and it does all that work for you. Of course, they still can't do that because not everyone would have access to the feature or would want to play with it off. but that's the far off dream, I suppose.
 
You're either genuinely retarded or pretending to be. "AI" simply does not exist.

Smartphones also do not exist, since phones are just machines and cannot be smart. Instant noodles don't exist because they are not cooked instantly. Wi-fi doesn't exist because "wi" stands for "wireless" and wi-fi routers use wires inside an ethernet cable to connect to modems. Cloud storage does not exist because your data is not actually stored as water vapor in the sky. Words can only have one definition, and if you use any other definition, it means the thing that the word denotes is not real. I am very smart.

I have heard how black people talk about ai. I am entirely unsurprised. I have overheard black people talk about ai in a way I can only describe as biblical. The whole critical thinking and checking what it says or does for some reasons seems to be overlooked. For whatever reason. It's just a magical box that does what you tell it to 100% of the time perfectly. It's like boomers but without the distrust that they have for all technology.

On a related note, you can make anti-AI leftists very uncomfortable by casually mentioning that America is actually one of the most AI-averse nations on earth in terms of public opinion, and places like India and Mexico have far higher approval rates. You can almost see the gears grinding in their heads as they struggle to fit "innocent and virtuous third-worlders whose wisdom we must always respect" and "evil oppressive gen AI" into this new context.
 
Besides, it's not like AI-generated images and video are still stuck in the 2022 Midjourney era. There is a lot of fine-grained control you can use to remove slop from generations in 2026 (ControlNet, LoRA, IPAdapter, Inpainting, Upscaler etc. and the undefeatable "Edit out the mistakes in Photoshop"). If you think that all AI-generated media (especially pictures) have the sloppa style, it means you have definitely seen AI-generated media that you didn't realize was AI-generated.
Can you give me examples of good AI generated videos if you have any? Throw in a real video too and don't tell me what it is. I can buy pictures fooling me but genuinely every AI video I've seen has been obvious (weird audio quality, very specific Definitely Not-Human way it structures most sentences, physics being incorrect at times, backgrounds being writhe-y and just Really Fucking Weird, etc. etc.). I'm just curious tbh
 
why can't studios just generate the assets themselves and package on the game?
That's kinda like asking why games can't run at 60fps instead of running at 30 boosted to 60 with dlss 4. Yea it'd be great if the thing that I pay a week's worth of wages for would run at a stable and not painful framerate and would have models and assets made to a high quality standard. But expecting that from any game that will be supported by dlss is just delusional considering the history of the games industry.
every AI video I've seen has been obvious
In the words of Terry A Davis. 'If you don't want to go for realism you can go for better than realism'. I don't want a realistic video. I have a phone camera and the ability to go outside. I cannot go outside and film some trippy shape store full of wacky niggers doing shit. The best use of ai video generation is to make things that you would not be able to make otherwise, shit like that is never going to look realistic because it's just not real.
 
Can you give me examples of good AI generated videos if you have any? Throw in a real video too and don't tell me what it is. I can buy pictures fooling me but genuinely every AI video I've seen has been obvious (weird audio quality, very specific Definitely Not-Human way it structures most sentences, physics being incorrect at times, backgrounds being writhe-y and just Really Fucking Weird, etc. etc.). I'm just curious tbh
When it's used as an additional tool (rather than just making media wholesale from prompts) to do stuff, I find the results very satisfactory.

 
Last edited:
This has no SOVL, this is vantablack brimstone straight from the depths of niggerhell, obtained by the brownest of nusois, born in Lesotho.
Unlike a lot of AI stuff, I can imagine the guy who made it wanting the piece to turn out exactly like this if he had to do it the old-fashioned way. Which I can't say for stuff like the Will Stancil cartoons. (I'd much rather Emily explore her original idea of using the AI for inbetweens rather than just generating the whole thing from scratch.)

But I don't want to get the thread way OT so I'll leave it at that.
 
No that's a good point. If you can use AI to make something that's 90% of the way to what you would've wanted to make traditionally anyway, that's a great use of it.

People like to pretend that AI lacks intentionality, that you aren't getting exactly what's in your head out onto the page, while ignoring the fact that even professional artists rarely get exactly what's in their head onto the page, it's always a compromise, or the piece evolves during the creation of it. You thought you wanted the character posed this way but then realized it was better that way. Is that "betraying your own artistic vision?" Artists are also their own worst critics, often saying that they wish they could fix this or that, but had to just call it done at some point.

And that's not even getting into the countless tweens posting off-model fan art of characters which clearly demonstrates an inability to get what they imagined onto the canvas. You can say it's more authentic, but it's still not what they pictured in their head. In many cases, AI would get them much closer to what they wanted to express.
 
>Traditional Art in le big [insert current year]? Pffffffft! The future is now old man. Just embrace the fact that digital art is le current thing. And there is no such thing as “degenerate” art you chud! Trad art is so boring and takes time anyways
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!1!11! I CANT BELIEVES LE EVIL HECKIN’ AI IS LITERALLY REPLACING MEEEEEEEEEE!1!1!1! I CANT BELIEVE AI TAKES ONLY 0.000001 SECONDS TO MAKE ART WHILE I HAVE TO SPEND 37482937383 HOURS TO MAKE MY GAY TRANNY VORE FART FAT FETISH ART!1!11!1! BOYCOTT AI1!1!1! SUPPORT REAL ARTISTS1!1!!11!1!

they are 100% like this btw
These people will claim to soycott AI and then gladly slurp it down in their daily life without realizing it anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom