Lastly: my IQ is between 100 and 115, I'm not telling you exactly because that's a private affair, I much take from Charles Murray's position on that, and yes, it's not brilliant, but passably intelligent.
It's admittedly mostly loaded to verbal, and probably the result of overlearning, but who's wiping the floor argumentatively here?
Verbal intelligence is still extremely useful. No, this is not the same as Kelly's stupid caricature of "linguistic intelligence". How he described that was basically how I'd imagine a tranny would co-opt a bunch of linguistic fetishes (the obsession with correct pronounciation might be an autogynephilic fetish), but the fact of the matter is, I demonstrate high reasoning skill and vocabularic propensity.
And yes, I have my own linguistic fetishes (hard /sneed/ pronounciation; I've admitted it before). I'd argue this is not autogynephilic in origin but infantilistic/autopaedophilic. /sneed/ is one of the hardest consonants for a child to master regardless of gender (at a certain age range anyway), but particularly acridly pronounced by females of that age range. Male children unless they're r-selects or neurofeminine don't tend to speak very clearly at all. Female children, although imprecise, try, typically by artifically hardening every consonant they pronounce.
Yes, I wanted to beat Cuntster to the chase of admitting that, seeing as he was boasting about noticing it it to admissions prior to my interview.
