Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

  1. The "well-regulated militia" part? That's what's known as a preamble. It explains why the right to bear arms is required.
  2. By committing felonies, you infringe upon the rights of other people and therefore give up many of your own. Your plan suggests that ordinary people would have their firearms confiscated from them even though they hadn't committed any crimes, making it unconstitutional.

Unconstitutional right now. I'd work on making it constitutional. As an example of what could be done without outlawing guns entirely, you can make an extremely elaborate and exhaustive process to discourage people from getting guns. You can ban most types of guns. You could put an extremely high tax on guns. You could create financial incentives and benefits for those who do not have guns. You can get rid of open carrying. You can ban guns on any government property. You can create a government mandate requiring guns to have a much smaller amount of bullets able to be shot before needing to load it with more bullets. You can work on making guns less dangerous and less harmful in the bullets used and the firing mechanism used. Plenty of different ideas to strong arm them.
 
Since you have such a poor grasp of shifting connotations in the face of absolute definitions (neverminding your ignorance of definitions contrary to whatever idiotic point you are trying to make), I'm going to just say that you are certainly the most exceptional individual I have ever seen, and I don't mean the dictionary definition of the word.

Also, a psycho stalker that wants to ban guns? Gee, I wonder why.

I carry a badge and deal with plenty of psycho nutjobs. I tell every normal person who asks to get a gun, learn how to use it, and consider carrying it.
 
Also you could make a government mandate of left handed guns. if these people are going to have guns lets make it as difficult and ridiculous for them as legally possible. As far as I am concerned, it makes you a despicable and horrible person to own a gun most of the time. Guns should never have been invented and I'll do my part if possible to eradicate them.
 
Also you could make a government mandate of left handed guns. if these people are going to have guns lets make it as difficult and ridiculous for them as legally possible. As far as I am concerned, it makes you a despicable and horrible person to own a gun most of the time. Guns should never have been invented and I'll do my part if possible to eradicate them.

μολὼν λαβέ bitch.
 
Also you could make a government mandate of left handed guns. if these people are going to have guns lets make it as difficult and ridiculous for them as legally possible. As far as I am concerned, it makes you a despicable and horrible person to own a gun most of the time. Guns should never have been invented and I'll do my part if possible to eradicate them.

What's your opinion of hunting? I thought you supposedly held ideals about living off the land?
 
You can ban most types of guns.
IMG_3595.GIF

...You do know what D.C. v. Heller is, right?
As far as I am concerned, it makes you a despicable and horrible person to own a gun most of the time.
What's your rationale for believing this?
 
Last edited:
Since you have such a poor grasp of shifting connotations in the face of absolute definitions (neverminding your ignorance of definitions contrary to whatever idiotic point you are trying to make), I'm going to just say that you are certainly the most exceptional individual I have ever seen, and I don't mean the dictionary definition of the word.

Also, a psycho stalker that wants to ban guns? Gee, I wonder why.

I carry a badge and deal with plenty of psycho nutjobs. I tell every normal person who asks to get a gun, learn how to use it, and consider carrying it.

I'm well aware of the negative connotations of words. People's ignorant use of language is no justification for forcing me to not use valid words. This is the same idiotic rhetoric that makes valid words into "swear words" that are "bad" to say.

First of all I am not a psycho anything. You want to call me a stalker, that's fine, but in no way am I a psychopath. I want to ban guns completely unrelated to me. i see how much evil they cause in this world. So much murder so much evil. A gun is a lazy man's weapon. If you are going to kill someone, use a knife. That's true skill and gives a fighting chance for the other person to flee or defend themselves. I'll never hurt Tamar or any woman ever. I believe its wrong to physically abuse women. Its wrong to physically abuse men too, but I have more compassion for women and I think a man who hits a woman is absolutely despicable human being. I would never dare touch a woman in a violent way and certainly not Tamar. She has nothing to fear from me. I make a personal promise never to own a gun in my life. I don't want other people to not have guns so that I am able to do things without fear of getting shot. I don't want people to kill innocent people so easily. Parents killing their own children accidentally. Children killing themselves and others. People who want to steal something killing others with guns. Guns are one of the worst inventions EVER invented. The inventors and engineers behind it should go to hell.

View attachment 245049
...You do know what D.C. v. Heller is, right?

What's your rationale for believing this?

The law is not stable. We have the right to change any law no matter what it is so long as a better law replaces it. I don't care what any stupid laws like D.C. v. Heller say. we can change that law regardless of what it says. obviously its easier said than done to change a law but its been done before and will be done again. We need to tighten gun regulation as much as possible, and the more we can change the law to enable that, the better.

What's your opinion of hunting? I thought you supposedly held ideals about living off the land?

Hunting is fine for food only. For sport or entertainment its immoral. People hunted before guns were invented. I suggest bow an arrow or a stun gun. or a spear.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm going to sell the land and buy land and exploit the homeless on a farmable patch of land instead.

Never said those who disagree with me deserve 40 lashes. Your behavior is what deserved it, not disagreeing with me.
Do it then faggot. Do all these things rather than merely talk about them.

And it's nice to see that you have justifications for being a dictator to people you exploit in your ghetto.
 
I'm well aware of the negative connotations of words. People's ignorant use of language is no justification for forcing me to not use valid words. This is the same idiotic rhetoric that makes valid words into "swear words" that are "bad" to say.

First of all I am not a psycho anything. You want to call me a stalker, that's fine, but in no way am I a psychopath. I want to ban guns completely unrelated to me. i see how much evil they cause in this world. So much murder so much evil. A gun is a lazy man's weapon. If you are going to kill someone, use a knife. That's true skill and gives a fighting chance for the other person to flee or defend themselves. I'll never hurt Tamar or any woman ever. I believe its wrong to physically abuse women. Its wrong to physically abuse men too, but I have more compassion for women and I think a man who hits a woman is absolutely despicable human being. I would never dare touch a woman in a violent way and certainly not Tamar. She has nothing to fear from me. I make a personal promise never to own a gun in my life. I don't want other people to not have guns so that I am able to do things without fear of getting shot. I don't want people to kill innocent people so easily. Parents killing their own children accidentally. Children killing themselves and others. People who want to steal something killing others with guns. Guns are one of the worst inventions EVER invented. The inventors and engineers behind it should go to hell.
If Tamar did something bad would you give her forty lashes? Since lashing seems to be an appropriate punishment in your eyes and all.
 
If Tamar did something bad would you give her forty lashes? Since lashing seems to be an appropriate punishment in your eyes and all.

No remember I am the one who will be the bitch. I'll have no right to punish her. She'll be the one who can punish me. I won't have any right to punish her. That will be part of the contract if it ever happens.

What's wrong with using a rifle to hunt, given that you have no inherent ethical objections to hunting for food?

I don't trust humans with guns. that's what's wrong with it. If humans could be trusted with guns, then using it for hunting would be tolerable. But it still gives an unfair advantage to humans over animals which is messed up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No remember I am the one who will be the bitch. I'll have no right to punish her. She'll be the one who can punish me. I won't have any right to punish her. That will be part of the contract if it ever happens.

You don't even obey her when she tells you to leave her the fuck alone and gets a fucking restraining order against you, you goddamn moron.

That's why you'll be a bitch, but you'll be a bitch in jail.
 
I make a personal promise never to own a gun in my life. I don't want other people to not have guns so that I am able to do things without fear of getting shot. I don't want people to kill innocent people so easily. Parents killing their own children accidentally. Children killing themselves and others. People who want to steal something killing others with guns. Guns are one of the worst inventions EVER invented. The inventors and engineers behind it should go to hell.
Does your average gun owner kill people on a regular basis? Besides, if you want to kill someone you're going to try and do it whether you have a gun or not.
A gun is a lazy man's weapon. If you are going to kill someone, use a knife. That's true skill and gives a fighting chance for the other person to flee or defend themselves.
Unless you know how to use a knife, you'll probably end up hurting yourself. And what are the people supposed to defend themselves with, seeing as you want to ban all guns?
I don't care what any stupid laws like D.C. v. Heller say. we can change that law regardless of what it says.
Heller isn't a law, it's a Supreme Court decision and is therefore almost impossible to repeal unless the Court decides it's unconstitutional in a later case.
 
You don't even obey her when she tells you to leave her the fuck alone and gets a fucking restraining order against you, you goddamn moron.

That's why you'll be a bitch, but you'll be a bitch in jail.

I'm not going to obey her if she isn't my wife or friend. I need to get something out of it.

Does your average gun owner kill people on a regular basis? Besides, if you want to kill someone you're going to try and do it whether you have a gun or not.

Unless you know how to use a knife, you'll probably end up hurting yourself. And what are the people supposed to defend themselves with, seeing as you want to ban all guns?

Heller isn't a law, it's a Supreme Court decision and is therefore almost impossible to repeal unless the Court decides it's unconstitutional in a later case.

Supreme court decisions make things into law. Whatever you want to call it, my point remains. we can change the law through whatever processes necessary.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZD.html

the link i provided is the dissenting opinion in the heller case. a decision of 5 to 4 is pretty close, and so to have 4 of our supreme judges be against a ruling is pretty compelling reason to reconsider the validity of the decision that was made. those four judges were not idiots and they are/were quite intelligent and experienced in judicial areas. So to just dismiss their expert viewpoint because of a mere five men's decision is nonsense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back