There's a post floating around where some user is trying to rally people against supposed "female pedophiles" and "TERF misandrists" who downplay female-on-male CSA. Except there's one hole in that narrative: both examples provided are men. I even have one of them ignored for disgusting misogynistic posts he made in the past. I also checked if either of them had posted in this thread. One hadn't, and the other one was pre-DMZ and he was arguing with the women here. This isn't about any particular person, though. This is about a general pattern: the gender of accountability blaming women for the things they do.
Something something, 1st rule of misogyny. Women are to blame for the actions of men.
It's quite telling that some male posters in that thread find the concept of women being apathethic towards them and their plights as "misandry". Yeah, it's truly a mystery why women, especially here, would be less inclined to care about their issues, particularly how male victims of sexual abuse get mistreated by ""society"" (read: 99% of the time men doing this mistreatment) when the same posters crying about this issue are the ones going "lol they voted for this!!" whenever there's a case of a white woman being raped by a non-white man or them just reveling at women being raped because they perceive them as "whores", along with celebrating women being jailed for terminating their pregnancies, regardless whether it was medically induced or a miscarriage, but hey, it's a feature not a bug.
You would think that given their statements how the """society """ expects men to conceal their feelings and vulnerabilities while actively discourages them from coming out about their stories of abuse, especially that of sexual nature, they would come to the conclusion that maybe the patriarchal system and society that heavily encourages the idea of "benevolent sexism" that it relies on through sentiments like "The ideal man is strong, aloof and stoic, someone that conceals their feelings and pain. You are a failed man if you managed to get abused by somebody, ESPECIALLY by a woman" and "Women are weak and docile but also natural caregivers and nurturers, who will always protect/look after children and never harm them", these men would come to the conclusion that this system does more damage than good because it creates the perfect enviroment for potential female predators and abusers to abuse children, including male ones, with them being forced to stay silenced about their abuse or face potential social ostracization if they come out with their story;
But no, of course not. They will keep insisting upon themselves how this system is working perfectly fine as intended and that we just have to double down on it more, because the eternal moidcattle is a masochistic glutton for pain that loves to make their whole existence about harming themselves while dragging everybody else in their endless self-flagellation ritual for elevation, so they can continue to setup the rakes they will eventually step on and blame everybody except for themselves for setting them up in first place.
I actually saw a man trying to argue that men aren't really 90% of pedophiles, and there are just untold numbers of female pedophiles out there freely molesting children while nobody reports it. Expert consensus is that boys are molested at higher rates than previously thought (maybe 1 in 13 rather than 1 in 20), but still nowhere near as often as girls are molested (1 in 5 estimate has been updated to 1 in 4), and there's zero evidence that female predators are anywhere near as prevalent as male ones. The data does show boys are sexually abused by women more often than girls are, but that still doesn't mean the majority of people who molest boys are female. It just means that, in the rare case that a woman molests a child, it's more likely to be a male child than a female one, since most pedophiles (men included) prefer the opposite sex. Boys are still vastly more likely to be sexually abused by older boys and men than by women and girls. You have to be an actual crackhead schizo to think women are out there sexually abusing kids at rates comparable to the male population, but nobody cares because misandry.
It's a classic case of "I really want to believe women are just as sexually depraved as men, so I will believe it regardless of the evidence." Like troons, they know the truth deep down and they're ashamed of it, so they stay in rabid denial of reality. It makes far more sense to say "yes, men as a group are far more sexually deviant than women, but that overall tendency doesn't define me as an individual" than to argue women are just as bad in that area. Unless, of course, it does define you as an individual and you're deflecting the shame you feel.
That's why I cannot take the "MEN GET RAPED AND ABUSED TOO!!!!!!!!!!" scrotes that barge in every conversation about women being abused at the hands of men in good faith. Because the moment you bring up the fact that boys are still more likely to be victimized at the hands of other boys and men (Remember the Catholic and Boy Scouts sexual abuse scandals, anybody?) , suddenly they're all quiet like church mouses because in reality they only say that not only to interrupt these conversations but also because they are so obsessed with the idea of women being equally depraved as men and push this idea because men are more likely to be victimized by other men, that women actually don't have it that bad and should put up with it because men suffer worse.
Also I find very eye-rolling when they also say some reddit statement like "IF GENDERS WERE REVERSED THEN THERE WOULD BE AN UPROAR ABOUT THIS!!11" in cases of women being predatory towards men.
Absolute bullshit. Epstein files dropped and men in those files that aren't dead still have careers and are going on with their lives, same goes with celebrities like Johnny Depp and Diddy,
men that you consider "regular Joes" who drug up their wives for a fetish website are still part of our society,
police men that sexually abuse their victims for 10 years walk scot free . Give me a break.
Thread tax
It's very bold of men to say how society forcing them to supress their feelings, meanwhile every other week we get to see them get into Ethan Ralphesque pig psychosis where they just rage on and on about women, with these psychotic vent sessions being so occuring on the Internet that there's an entire industry around it.
>Also men are oppressed by school teachers but are still above women.
And that's where 99% of resentment comes from. They think women are inferior to them and are the one meant to do the submission part, so when they're put in a position where the woman is the "dominant" one through being a figure of authority they resent it because in their eyes, they are forced into the role of a woman, a creature they deem inferior, but they will submit just fine to another man with no issue though, but frame their submission to that man as "structure" .
School was strict ("feminized" in moid parlance) when it was male-only -- male students, male teachers -- and testerical boys were caned and expelled. The low-IQ shitter moids who were coddled at a woke inclusive school that catered to their "neurodivergence" (defective moid brain) would've been expelled out of a trad school.
https://newbrunswicktoday.com/2026/...er-prosecuted-for-sexual-abuse-in-two-states/
They say "strict" school is "feminized" because girls do much better at it than moids. And they do! Bottom quintile males (like themselves) are a blight on society and belong in prison/juvie. Bottom quintile females are much better behaved than bottom quintile moids, in every social group, in every age group, and
regardless of the sex of authorities. If what moids say is true, if girls and women are better behaved because the authorities are female, then GOD IS A WOMAN.
That's why I keep saying "You don't really want that" whenever men advocate for "retvrn" of "pre-feminized" schools, even though schools to this day use the Prussian model of education, from the 18th-19th century that's meant to produce obedient citizens and workers. The reality is that in a scenario where we returned to the supposed masculine idea of schools with male teachers and "le based" corporal punishment like these men want, they would be also the first ones complaining about it. Why you ask? Because to the shocker of nobody, the shit stirring moidlings that distrupt the class that these men champion and advocate for, would be the most likely ones to have corporal punishment used on them, but of course they would find some way to blame it on women as per usual.
I genuinely despise this "noble savage"-fication of class distrupting bottom barrel moidlings in school and just in public spaces in general.
"B-b-b-but these boys aren't meant to sit down at a desk for 7-8 hours!! They are energetic and yearn to go out and play!!1"
Okay..I'm pretty sure girls want to do that too lol. And yet this thought never occurs for men and male supremacist women, because they just assume that it's just part of . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁female nature. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ for women and girls to not be distruptive shitheads thats been implanted in us through biology and not something that has been socialized into women and girls since early life.
There is something incredibly ironic how men that defend low tier moidlings LOVE going on about how "feminized" schools are all about DEI and giving participation trophies to those that aren't smart or talented as prodigies, but meanwhile their ideal definition of a school is a facility where class distrupting boys not only get to be prioritized and accomandated by their teachers, but also are allowed to act like complete chimps and be rewarded for it by their teachers for smearing shit on the wall like one.
of course men shouldn't be accountable for their lack of work and innate desire to fuck around 24 7. Actually women should be confined to the kitchen so men can have their career and bangmaid handouts.
