Culture Michael Jackson biopic smashes box office record - Hee hee

The new musical film about Michael Jackson has stormed the worldwide box office, scoring the highest opening weekend ever for a biopic.

The singer's nephew Jaafar Jackson portrays him in Michael, which has taken $217m (£160m) globally since it opened on Wednesday.

Queen musical Bohemian Rhapsody, which launched with $124m (£91m) in 2018 and starred Rami Malek as Freddie Mercury, previously held the box office record for a musical biopic.

But Michael also surpassed the $180m (£133m) taken by 2024's Oppenheimer, giving the King of Pop the biggest worldwide opening weekend for a biopic of any kind.
Adam Fogelson, chairman of the film's US distributor Lionsgate, said: "You don't deliver this figure unless you're seeing huge numbers across every conceivable demographic. [Audiences] are clearly having a blast."

The film has gone down much better with audiences than it did with critics, several of whom complained that it depicted a "sanitised" version of Jackson's career.

Reviews aggregator Rotten Tomatoes recorded a significant gap between the 38% average score awarded by critics, and the 97% average rating from audiences.

The film's release follows a string of musical biopics over the last decade, which are seen by Hollywood as reliable box office hits.

Queen, Sir Elton John, Bob Dylan, Aretha Franklin, Elvis Presley, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Marley, Amy Winehouse, NWA, Robbie Williams and Whitney Houston have all received the cinematic treatment in recent years.

Michael is financially backed by the late superstar's estate and uses his original vocals for the musical numbers, which dominate the film.
Singer Michael Jackson, wearing a black and gold suit, performs at the 1993 Pasadena, California, Superbowl XXVII halftime show.
Image source,Getty Images
Image caption,
Jackson, pictured at the Super Bowl in 1993, is best known for hits such as Billie Jean, Thriller and Beat It
Michael does not include any mention of the child sexual abuse accusations that were made against the singer.

Jackson always maintained his innocence, and was found not guilty of child molestation in 2005.

Filmmakers originally intended to include references to some of the allegations, but the footage was scrapped after the rediscovery of a historic non-disclosure agreement Jackson made with one of his accusers.

The third act of Michael had been due to centre on accusations made by Jordan Chandler in the 1990s, but a settlement Jackson made with the boy's family at the time included a clause that prohibited the singer's estate ever mentioning him in any movie.

The film was reworked and a series of reshoots took place after the discovery, and Michael now instead concludes in 1988, before any accusations were made.

Director Antoine Fuqua told Deadline, external over the weekend that the rediscovery of the NDA led to a "tough period" because the team had to "rethink everything".

"All movies have different challenges, but this one was unique," he said, adding that the team got around the issue by refocusing on Jackson's musical career.

The resulting film leans heavily on recreated concert performances and examines the strained relationship with his father Joseph, played in the film by Oscar nominee Colman Domingo.

The costly reshoots contributed to the film's sizeable price tag, reported to be around $200m (£148m), making it one of the most expensive biopics of all time.

Michael opened on the same weekend throughout most of the world, but it is still to launch in Japan, where the local distributor has scheduled a June release date.

The film is part of a recent upward swing for cinemas, after a string of box office hits such as The Super Mario Galaxy Movie and Project Hail Mary, with other major releases including The Devil Wears Prada 2 this weekend set to follow.

Jackson was known for worldwide hits such as Billie Jean, Beat It, Smooth Criminal and Black or White, while 1982's Thriller is the biggest-selling album of all time.






 
think the case of MJ is more complicated than other cases of celebrity pedophilia. He was sus, no doubt about it, but based on all of the evidence we have right now, it's really hard to say he was 100% guilty. These posts by @Xarpho's Return and @beautiful person explain it a lot better:
That's the thing you first see the pics and all the accusers and you think this MF is guilty but then you actually read the evidence who the accusers are and the case gets weaker and weaker. They also interviewed hundreds of kids in the 90s and didn't get any other accuser.
 
The people who think he’s innocent don’t want to hear that and the people who think he’s guilty don’t want to see another biopic. In all truth, whatever happened was probably weirder than any of us want to imagine, he had more resources to groom these kids and was near universally loved but had no close adult friendships and therefore not questioned.

Wade Robinson was taken from a child impersonator of MJ and ended up as choreographer to the largest acts in the late 90’s. And he credited it all to being closely mentored by his hero who didn’t even take his phone call when Wade was trying to thank him for helping him make it. There’s another kid who basically saw the boy who was replacing him move in to Neverland Ranch when he was aging out.

Prince was right about everything.

Open unashamed classic pedo behavior and people still defend and deny. Lets assume he was just a peter pan stunted weirdo who genuinely loved these kids. Why ghost the people you supposedly are so close with the second they go from hairless young boys into fully formed young men?

You've been mentoring and helping and literally sleeping in the same bed with these boys for years. Now suddenly you couldn't care less about them? No follow up? No seeing how they are doing and guiding them into adulthood. Seeing what colleges they go to and being there for your deep personal friends who are basically your little brothers at this point? We know why. Because the second they aged out of his sexual fetish zone they stopped being of any use to him and he discarded them and cycled in the next batch. It really is textbook pedo shit. I have yet to see a single plausible defense of this behavior that doesn't explain itself with him fucking children and getting the ick the more they grow into adults.
 
Why ghost the people you supposedly are so close with the second they go from hairless young boys into fully formed young men?
He didn’t? Hell his latest accusers are part of a family that literally grew up with him, even knowing him right till death. As adults. Father even wrote a book praising him. Way to be wildly incorrect, shows you have no knowledge of the situation and are just going off of effeminate feelings over rational thought and can be dismissed.

>hidden profile
Emotionally fragile too. Okay then.
 
Not so amazing when you understand that people have absolutely zero trust in the system that accused him.
Publicizing all the slumber parties he enjoyed with a carousel of various young boys sharing his bed for decades plus building a grooming land theme park in Santa Barbara had nothing to do with the system. It was all MJ’s behaviors and words that made his gleeful pedophilia obvious to the entire world, minus retards and other pedo defenders.

But it’s always helpful to blame systematic racism and the Jews when you get called out for molesting little boys. I mean MJ paid their parents fair and square. It’s not his fault the money and vacations had to stop after they hit puberty. Boy hit the wall at 12 for him.
 
Prince was right about everything.
Wait, what did Prince say?

Trump should give Michael a Presidential Medal of Freedom. For no other reason than it would cause drama.
Well Trump and MJ were pretty close friends when MJ was still alive. Actually, I think Trump is/was (Idk if MAGA changed the Jacksons' stance on him) pretty close with the entire Jackson family.
 
The reason why I don't believe the MJ noncery accusations is because, for a guy who was famous and rich as shit and who had access to hundreds of minors through fundraisers and charity events, he's only ever been accused by less than a dozen people who all seemed to want nothing but a fat payout. You would expect someone like this to molest literally hundreds of people and that sooner or later it would come out, especially after the guy dies. It happened with Jimmy Savile and a bunch of others so why doesn't it happen with Michael Jackson?

Regardless of what you think about him, redditors a ragepigging hard because this movie makes a billion dollars while their favourite political slopaganda always barely breaks even and it's funny as shit.
 
For a country that claims pedos need to face the wall it’s amazing how they can sell the same public hero worship the 20th century’s most famous and public boy rapist.
We don't give enough grief to nearly enough musicians, or celebrities for that matter.

Tom Cruise will get away scot-free his entire fucking life. Count on it.

You would expect someone like this to molest literally hundreds of people and that sooner or later it would come out, especially after the guy dies. It happened with Jimmy Savile and a bunch of others so why doesn't it happen with Michael Jackson?
Do you think he indiscriminately chose people? Or do you think there's such a thing as a perfect victim?

Because if I were a predator, I'd choose the exact kind of people that would be the least believable.

To say nothing of the fact that, I'm sure every successful criminal mastermind from Rasputin to Esptein surrounded himself with useful cover of people that weren't involved in his shenanigans so they could vouch for him without hesitation.
 
Are you fucking labeling Michael Jackson a criminal mastermind? Really, the dumb nigger that got his hair set on fire?
One need not be a genius to be good at being a shit person or understand human psychology on a malicious level.

I used to work with a chick, we'll call her "Kathy". Kathy, it was agreed upon by at least half the office hated me because I was more attractive and thinner than she was. She was also agreed upon to be as thick as a brick.

Yet somehow, she attempted to turn the whole office against me and even tried to trap me in a way that she could report me to our supervisor.

She was critiquing a document I wrote, and questioned my use of the word "calculate" (as in, she needed me to define it for her), before saying, "you need to explain it to a stupid person like me" Yes, she called herself stupid. So, I either change it to whatever she wanted, or explain it and confirm I thought she was stupid.

I presented a third option which I thought might get me out of trouble: I suggested she recommend a change to me. When the boss told me she complained to him about that, I explained it exactly the way I explained it to you. The boss got it and sorted it with her, but my point is, when I explained it to other people in the office, they were actually pretty shocked she could come up with a trap that smart.

You don't have to be a genius to be smart at certain things, particularly if you understand how a scam works.
 
I always thought that we complicate his case that much. He was an abused child who, as soon as he had money and freedom, tried to create what he thought childhood would be, basically living in Disneyland permanently and have friends "his age" to pretend they were all kids together. A similar case is how Lady Di had this need to give love and touch people because she never had that love herself during her childhood and her marriage.

The obvious difference between them is that, first, she was a woman, which is always a pass for things like this. Two, she didn't want to recreate her childhood because, as bad as it could have been, she wasn't abused, so she grew up as normal as possible for her position. That's why, instead of randomly hugging kids, she poured all of that into hugging sick people, refugees, etc. She did the same as Michael, but as an adult who understood boundaries because her father didn't beat her or exploit her as Joe Jackson did with Michael. Of course this isn't to excuse MJ's behavior, only to explain why he was like he was. I don't see malice on his actions, but I can see why they were so misunderstood (with all reason) and why savvier people took the chance to exploit them as well.

This actually gives me a little hope, because just think how much the Null biopic is going to make!
That depends. Can he moonwalk?
 
No Jordie, no baby dangling, no mugshot, no cross dressing, no nose falling off in court, no trial and no Dr. Conrad Murray.

Does anyone else feel cheated? How could they leave all the good stuff out.
 
Back
Top Bottom