Culture Why Andy Serkis Turned ‘Animal Farm’ Into a Family Film—and What It Teaches Kids

Link (Archive)

Why Andy Serkis Turned ‘Animal Farm’ Into a Family Film—and What It Teaches Kids​

IMG_7340.jpeg
Yes, Andy Serkis has heard the controversy about his film Animal Farm, out in theaters on May 1, 2026. Why would he create a family-friendly adaptation of George Orwell’s famously dark 1945 book which uses farm animals to critique totalitarianism? For the beloved director, actor, and dad of three, the answer is simple: He wants to get young minds thinking.

“We wanted to aim it at young inquiring minds so that parents could ask them what they thought about things,” says Serkis, who fell in love with the book as a kid and wanted to make this film for about 15 years. “That was one of the objectives of it—placing them in the driving seat.”

It’s what inspired the creation of the character Lucky, a piglet who does not appear in the book, battling between his own morals and tyranny. Serkis envisioned children exploring their own ideas about what's right and wrong through the likable (and adorable) main character, who is perfectly voiced by Strangers Things star Gaten Matarazzo.

“You go on this journey with him being sucked into this more glamorous world of everything that the greed of the pigs brings them,” says the director, who also voices original Manor Farm owner Mr. Jones in the film. “We just thought that'd be good for kids to experience.”

But readers of the book will recognize other characters, including main antagonist Napoleon, brilliantly voiced by Seth Rogen, and the dedicated Boxer, beautifully brought to life by Woody Harrelson, among others. And even if they notice other changes, such as Freida Pilkington, the reimagined farm owner Mr. Pilkington memorably voiced by Glenn Close, the themes are pretty much in line with Orwell’s book.

“We’ve not drifted that far from his intention,” says the Planet of the Apes star. “It’s just making it more applicable to the world that we're living in now, rather than totalitarian Russia of the 1940s…And we worked very closely with the Orwell estate to establish that if we were going to tell the story, they believed that it was the right thing to do to make it a more contemporary version.”

What Kids Can Learn From the 'Animal Farm' Movie​

In the PG-rated film, kids will see how being power-hungry can corrupt a family or a society and how inequality is normalized when the animals in the story aren't treated fairly. They'll hear the famous phrase, "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." And especially through the friendship of Lucky and Boxer, they'll grasp why that phrase is so problematic.

But this film isn't without humor. Kids will get a laugh along the way with fart jokes, a slaughterhouse misunderstanding, and more lighthearted scenes. Don't worry about a bleak conclusion, either. This film offers families a much happier ending, another change from the book.

“As an eternally kind of relevant book, we know that history repeats itself. It goes around in cycles but genuinely, we have to ask ourselves, why is it that we always end up in the same position where nothing really moves forward that much?” explains Serkis. "You have to keep trying."

That's the message he hopes kids will understand through the altered ending.

“We’re not tying it up in a nice, shiny bow and saying that we all live happily ever after—far from it," he says. "We're saying it's up to the next generation to at least try. You have to engage and you have to keep questioning the leadership that stopped listening to you and telling you lies because we're living in a world where nobody knows what truth is anymore.”

Is the ‘Animal Farm’ Film Too Dark for Kids?​

Serkis, who also released an Animal Farmaudiobook, acknowledges that the violence in the book can be graphic and upsetting. He made it a point to tone that down in the film, even when portraying the characters.

“We wanted to keep the sinister nature of Napoleon as a charismatic kind of guy you fall for, rather than being a brutal dictator, even though he's malicious and malign underneath it,” he gives as an example. “He's just manages to do it all with a smile in this version.”

Some scenes may still be inappropriate for much younger kids, such as moments of the pigs drinking “naughty juice,” Boxer getting injured, fight scenes, and Napoleon’s eventual takedown and defeat. But overall, children may walk away feeling they can make change, even in their small friend groups, by leading with kindness and compassion, and be empowered to ask questions about politics and social justice—no matter where their families lean politically.

“I don't mind if people like it or dislike it,” says Serkis, “but as long as there's some discourse and everyone engages in conversation about it, that’s the intention of it.”
 
For the record Serkis is pretty much an open commie so expecting him to remake Animal Farm as Orwell intended is crazy.

Turning Animal Farm into a "family friendly" kiddie film about capitalism bad was also...not really expected. This will bomb and bomb hard.
 
For the record Serkis is pretty much an open commie so expecting him to remake Animal Farm as Orwell intended is crazy.

Turning Animal Farm into a "family friendly" kiddie film about capitalism bad was also...not really expected. This will bomb and bomb hard.
Although George Orwell was a socialist himself, he became disillusioned with communism when he saw what was happening under Stalin, and speaking of George Orwell, this quote from 1984 comes to mind:
Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.
 
You know the film itself is catching all of the flak, but I think it's strange that Angel films, a supposedly values based and "Christian" (although it's actually Mormon) film company would distribute this sort of absolute filth. Just another example of Mormons being heretical grifters.
 
You know the film itself is catching all of the flak, but I think it's strange that Angel films, a supposedly values based and "Christian" (although it's actually Mormon) film company would distribute this sort of absolute filth. Just another example of Mormons being heretical grifters.
One theory I've heard is that Angel wanted Serkis in "Young Washington," but as a quid pro quo that agreed to distribute "Animal Farm," knowing that film is shit.
 
Personally? I liked the 90's better, which was when Hollywood radically changed every book adaptation into a romantic comedy instead of socialist propaganda....

... speaking of which?

I find it hilarious that a book that took the piss out of socialism, written by a socialist, based on his personal lived experiences when it came to advocating for socialism to actual people... was changed into a movie that says capitalism was the REAL enemy all along!

As soon as a socialist director got their hands on it.... that is.
 
Last edited:
One theory I've heard is that Angel wanted Serkis in "Young Washington," but as a quid pro quo that agreed to distribute "Animal Farm," knowing that film is shit.
That wouldn't really absolve them in my book, in fact that would be worse. "We are going to distribute your communist propaganda interpretation of Animal Farm so that we can give you even more work and exposure under our brand". Mind you that communism is inherently hostile to Christianity and has been responsible for the persecution of millions of Christians. But I guess Angel doesn't care, because Mormons aren't Christians.
 
Serkis, who also released an Animal Farmaudiobook, acknowledges that the violence in the book can be graphic and upsetting. He made it a point to tone that down in the film, even when portraying the characters.
Why? Kids read this shit in like 5th grade and they're fine.
None of these fuckers finished grade school, that's why, they have no clue that this is a book that kids read.
“We’ve not drifted that far from his intention,”
Oh, that's great, I'm glad to hear that.
children may walk away feeling they can make change, even in their small friend groups, by leading with kindness and compassion, and be empowered to ask questions about politics and social justice—no matter where their families lean politically.
That's not anything like what the book makes you think after reading it. The book ends with the villains winning pretty much unanimously.
They even laugh about how the rest of the farm animals are idiots.

Truth is, if they were to update the book for the 2020's, the satire would make fun of modern Anglo-leftism and since Hollywood is full of Anglo-leftists, that can't happen.
 
“We’ve not drifted that far from his intention,” says the Planet of the Apes star. “It’s just making it more applicable to the world that we're living in now, rather than totalitarian Russia of the 1940s
Can't bring himself to besmirch the 'good' name of communism or the soviet union.
In the PG-rated film, kids will see how being power-hungry can corrupt a family or a society
Which is why men should be trained to wield power responsibly than be taught to fear or shun power.

Power is like water. It has to go somewhere and it can stagnate if stuck in one place for too long.

how inequality is normalized
Humans are not equal and never have been. The fact that we are not equal is not a license to for the strong to abuse the weak, or for the collective weak to abuse the strong (Boxer).
This film offers families a much happier ending, another change from the book.
At least when Paul Verhoeven tried to butcher Starship Troopers, he accidentally made an aesthetic meme-fest that got people to go compare his work to the book and then realized that veteran-based republicanism is kind of based.

The establishment's acceptance of Orwell (Blair) distracts from the dystopian literature that more accurately reflects their envisioned futures (Brave New World, This Perfect Day).
 
One of the only non-Kennedy-murder successes of the CIA was a very nice animated version of Animal Farm
I hated this version's ending even as a kid but I didn't understand why back then.
Now I do.
It's because, after the book's ending, they attach a scene where the animals literally have a communist uprising and defeat the evil capitalist pigs, completely shitting over the point of the book.
 
I hated this version's ending even as a kid but I didn't understand why back then.
Now I do.
It's because, after the book's ending, they attach a scene where the animals literally have a communist uprising and defeat the evil capitalist pigs, completely shitting over the point of the book.
How does the the 50s film shit on the book? The animals revolt because conditions were horrible on the farm, they revolt again against the bigs because they were no better or even worse than the farmer. I don't think that violates any themes of the book.
 
How does the the 50s film shit on the book? The animals revolt because conditions were horrible on the farm, they revolt again against the bigs because they were no better or even worse than the farmer. I don't think that violates any themes of the book.
I definitely don't think it is in line with Orwell's vision. 1984 doesn't end with a proletariat uprising. It wouldn't make sense that Animal Farm would lead to an uprising. If anything we are given very little indication that the other animals could ever govern themselves. Orwell is also famous for his prediction for the future being a boot on a human face, forever.
 
I definitely don't think it is in line with Orwell's vision. 1984 doesn't end with a proletariat uprising. It wouldn't make sense that Animal Farm would lead to an uprising. If anything we are given very little indication that the other animals could ever govern themselves. Orwell is also famous for his prediction for the future being a boot on a human face, forever.
It doesn't show the animals living happily ever after at the end. The idea that animal farm is stuck on an endless cycle of oppression, revolution, new oppression seems very Orwellian. But givin it is a CIA funded project, I think the real reason for adapting AF and adding that scene is to be a threat to Moscow.
 
Back
Top Bottom