Culture Michael Jackson biopic smashes box office record - Hee hee

The new musical film about Michael Jackson has stormed the worldwide box office, scoring the highest opening weekend ever for a biopic.

The singer's nephew Jaafar Jackson portrays him in Michael, which has taken $217m (£160m) globally since it opened on Wednesday.

Queen musical Bohemian Rhapsody, which launched with $124m (£91m) in 2018 and starred Rami Malek as Freddie Mercury, previously held the box office record for a musical biopic.

But Michael also surpassed the $180m (£133m) taken by 2024's Oppenheimer, giving the King of Pop the biggest worldwide opening weekend for a biopic of any kind.
Adam Fogelson, chairman of the film's US distributor Lionsgate, said: "You don't deliver this figure unless you're seeing huge numbers across every conceivable demographic. [Audiences] are clearly having a blast."

The film has gone down much better with audiences than it did with critics, several of whom complained that it depicted a "sanitised" version of Jackson's career.

Reviews aggregator Rotten Tomatoes recorded a significant gap between the 38% average score awarded by critics, and the 97% average rating from audiences.

The film's release follows a string of musical biopics over the last decade, which are seen by Hollywood as reliable box office hits.

Queen, Sir Elton John, Bob Dylan, Aretha Franklin, Elvis Presley, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Marley, Amy Winehouse, NWA, Robbie Williams and Whitney Houston have all received the cinematic treatment in recent years.

Michael is financially backed by the late superstar's estate and uses his original vocals for the musical numbers, which dominate the film.
Singer Michael Jackson, wearing a black and gold suit, performs at the 1993 Pasadena, California, Superbowl XXVII halftime show.
Image source,Getty Images
Image caption,
Jackson, pictured at the Super Bowl in 1993, is best known for hits such as Billie Jean, Thriller and Beat It
Michael does not include any mention of the child sexual abuse accusations that were made against the singer.

Jackson always maintained his innocence, and was found not guilty of child molestation in 2005.

Filmmakers originally intended to include references to some of the allegations, but the footage was scrapped after the rediscovery of a historic non-disclosure agreement Jackson made with one of his accusers.

The third act of Michael had been due to centre on accusations made by Jordan Chandler in the 1990s, but a settlement Jackson made with the boy's family at the time included a clause that prohibited the singer's estate ever mentioning him in any movie.

The film was reworked and a series of reshoots took place after the discovery, and Michael now instead concludes in 1988, before any accusations were made.

Director Antoine Fuqua told Deadline, external over the weekend that the rediscovery of the NDA led to a "tough period" because the team had to "rethink everything".

"All movies have different challenges, but this one was unique," he said, adding that the team got around the issue by refocusing on Jackson's musical career.

The resulting film leans heavily on recreated concert performances and examines the strained relationship with his father Joseph, played in the film by Oscar nominee Colman Domingo.

The costly reshoots contributed to the film's sizeable price tag, reported to be around $200m (£148m), making it one of the most expensive biopics of all time.

Michael opened on the same weekend throughout most of the world, but it is still to launch in Japan, where the local distributor has scheduled a June release date.

The film is part of a recent upward swing for cinemas, after a string of box office hits such as The Super Mario Galaxy Movie and Project Hail Mary, with other major releases including The Devil Wears Prada 2 this weekend set to follow.

Jackson was known for worldwide hits such as Billie Jean, Beat It, Smooth Criminal and Black or White, while 1982's Thriller is the biggest-selling album of all time.






 
The reason why I don't believe the MJ noncery accusations is because, for a guy who was famous and rich as shit and who had access to hundreds of minors through fundraisers and charity events, he's only ever been accused by less than a dozen people who all seemed to want nothing but a fat payout. You would expect someone like this to molest literally hundreds of people and that sooner or later it would come out, especially after the guy dies. It happened with Jimmy Savile and a bunch of others so why doesn't it happen with Michael Jackson?

Regardless of what you think about him, redditors a ragepigging hard because this movie makes a billion dollars while their favourite political slopaganda always barely breaks even and it's funny as shit.
He had had naked pictures of little boys in his bedroom. You all fucking lose your minds when a 22 year old streamer flirts with a 17 year old but a guy that was ASS RAPING boys is acceptable somehow

In Boys Will Be Boys around ninety percent of the boys are naked. The worst images are far too lewd for us to publish here, and could possibly be illegal in many countries (reaching up to 6 on the COPINE scale). We talked with someone who has seen the book, who said, “This book is clearly targeted at pedophiles. One shot shows a boy staring straight to camera, relaxing in an easy chair totally naked, his legs spread with his genitals clearly on show. Another photo shows a boy in speedos, an erection clearly visible. Yet another is of a nude boy climbing a tree, shot from below so that nothing is left to the imagination.



Here's his lawyer basically admitting he molested those kids.

I always thought that we complicate his case that much. He was an abused child who, as soon as he had money and freedom, tried to create what he thought childhood would be, basically living in Disneyland permanently and have friends "his age" to pretend they were all kids together. A similar case is how Lady Di had this need to give love and touch people because she never had that love herself during her childhood and her marriage.
It's creepy seeing people talk like this. They bring up sob stories about his childhood every time like that somehow made him a pedo. I dont know why this nonce gets so much grace and understanding no one else gets
 
Regardless of what you think about him, redditors a ragepigging hard because this movie makes a billion dollars while their favourite political slopaganda always barely breaks even and it's funny as shit.
They were cheering when a "serious" biopic about the guy who built the H-bomb and included an unnecessary sex side plot was the biggest film in the nation, but, one about an entertainer that doesn't include everything unsavory he was ever accused of? Well, that just won't stand! HOW DARE YOU GOOD SIR!
 
My local cinema was fairly busy. Quite a few young kids dancing. IMAX was packed with quite a bit of crying/dancing.
Well worth a watch. Jaafar was outstanding and must be pretty dammed confident in MJ's innocence to take on the role.

Michael gave me a crash course on how evil the media was when I was younger. They tore him apart for his appearance which he couldn't help. I think he was certainly inappropriate but don't think he did it. So many people would have to be lying for the accusers to be telling the truth and they have been caught out with falsehoods.
He was so naive, interviewers would set him up with a (very obvious!) trap and he would just blunder straight into it.

I hate journos.png
 
Apparently the only thing Epstein did wrong was not singing and dancing well enough. Oh, and not being black, but tbf Michael had trouble with that part too.
Nah, Epstein would have had to have started out as a child sensation, growing up with America and earning the love of the country with his boy band before going solo as an adult and becoming a global phenomenon.
 
My local cinema was fairly busy. Quite a few young kids dancing. IMAX was packed with quite a bit of crying/dancing.
Well worth a watch. Jaafar was outstanding and must be pretty dammed confident in MJ's innocence to take on the role.

Michael gave me a crash course on how evil the media was when I was younger. They tore him apart for his appearance which he couldn't help. I think he was certainly inappropriate but don't think he did it. So many people would have to be lying for the accusers to be telling the truth and they have been caught out with falsehoods.
He was so naive, interviewers would set him up with a (very obvious!) trap and he would just blunder straight into it.

He couldn't help spending millions on plastic surgery to cosplay as a white woman? why do conservatives need their based nigger so badly? the dude had CSAM in his bedroom.

HHBldb1bQAAmqdI.jpgHHBldbsaMAA2Bp2.jpg
 
You do know he had vitilago as well as third degree burns on his head? Just because you don't understand anything because you are a hysterical retard doesn't change what the facts are.
Why is he wearing women's wigs and doing his makeup like a woman? Why did he have nude images of boys in his bedroom? You're white knighting this pedophile really hard
HHZjsntbgAEvkqY.jpg

Apparently the only thing Epstein did wrong was not singing and dancing well enough. Oh, and not being black, but tbf Michael had trouble with that part too.
They need their based niggers. America cannot survive without them

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom