Not Being Stupid Is ‘Cognitive Privilege’ - Which Is Just Like White Privilege

  • Thread starter Thread starter LU 961
  • Start date Start date
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/29/u...ilege-now-which-is-just-like-white-privilege/

The University of Iowa’s student newspaper has announced the discovery of a special privilege which intelligent people acquire as an accident of birth. This new privilege — called “cognitive privilege” — functions in essentially the same way as white privilege.

The Daily Iowan revealed the discovery of this new privilege earlier this week.

Garden-variety white privilege “is an important topic that deserves a public discussion,” the op-ed on “cognitive privilege” explains, but it is also “prudent to at least mention the wider concept contained therein: that of privilege itself.”

Privilege in general is “the receipt of certain benefits wholly through accident of birth and it is “undeniable that privilege itself is a reality,” the student newspaper explains.

Also, Williams declares, robots will wipe out manual labor jobs but will somehow not affect jobs available to members of a special cognitive elite.

“Thus, the accident of having been born smart enough to be able to be successful is a great benefit that you did absolutely nothing to earn. Consequently, you have nothing to be proud of for being smart.”

Williams believes that America will be better able to discuss “white privilege” and the “temperature-rising topic of racial privilege” if it is able to admit the existence of “cognitive privilege.”

Don’t worry, though. “The purpose” here “is not to instill a sort of Catholic guilt in someone’s psyche.”

“The purpose of pointing out someone’s privilege is to remind them of the infinite number of experiences that are possible and the very large number of experiences that are actual that they know very little about.” (Williams does not say how he has obtained his special knowledge in this regard.)

“Feelings of guilt are natural when coming to consciousness of one’s place in the scheme of things — and noticing that one has been conferred benefits through sheer accident — but guilt is an impediment to social-justice action, not a motivator (guilt slides easily into resentment),” the author writes.

“We can debate whether ‘whiteness’ is a sort of ‘master privilege’ that overrules all others.”

The concept of “white privilege” was popularized in academic circles by a 1987 essay entitled “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack.” The author was Peggy McIntosh, an inconsequential white feminist.

I have a feeling that the creator of the original article does not have this privilege, so they go REEEEEEEE.

- I might hate Fox News, but this does give me a little hope for humanity.
 
But how will sjws cope without being able to imagine they are smarter than everyone else?

I say we embrace this. Any time you see an sjw bitching about Trump voters or comic books or gamergate lose your shit at them for denying those people their lived experiences and trying to impose their own ideals from a place of cognitive privilege. If they have gone to college discount their experiences immediately for being cognitive supremacists.
 
That'd make a good update. The government doesn't make you wear the mask, your friends all just guilt trip you about how unfair it is that you're beautiful and how you need to actively dismantle your own appearance privilege, and you should probably try a few concussions or have industrial noises blaring in your ears at all times to reduce your cognitive privilege. There can be self-crit circles where people decide upon their own forms of handicapping -- I mean, disabling -- I mean, differently abling, I'm sorry.
 
I'd like to see these morons live without smart people around to do shit to keep their dumb asses alive. They're the privileged ones, being entitled babies who don't do shit even for their own survival.
Now I want a day without smart people. The best thing about it would be that afterwards if you wanted to know if someone was smart you just ask if they did the march. If they did, you know they are an idiot.
 
I would also love to know how intelligent a person would have to be to have 'cognitive privilege'. How is that even measured? Like, you have this IQ, thus you are privileged? I have no idea how this is even supposed to work.
 
Darwin would either have a field day or an aneurysm over these folks if they sincerely believe it hurts their soft brain tissue to learn new things and to think for themselves.
They are people who live in a parasitic mode of life; what a normal human invests in brain tissue, they invest in reproduction.
Darwin would feel vindicated.
 
Back