All Female Lord of the Flies Salt

Status
Not open for further replies.

CatParty

Boo
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
http://deadline.com/2017/08/lord-of...warner-bros-william-golding-novel-1202158421/

Scott McGehee & David Siegel have made a deal at Warner Bros to write and direct a new version of Lord Of The Flies, based on the iconic William Golding novel. They plan to be faithful to the novel with one major twist: the young students stranded on a remote island who descend into a savage social order will be girls.
It is an intriguing take on a novel that was most famously turned into a 1963 film by Peter Brook. It was later turned into a 1990 Castle Rock film by director Harry Hook, which is how Warner Bros wound up with some of the rights. McGehee & Siegel last directed the 2012 drama What Maisie Knew, and before that Bee Season and The Deep End. They are very good at depicting traumatic events and stories seen through youthful eyes. They told Deadline they are big fans of Brook’s original film, but thought a new contemporized version felt timely. It took awhile for Warner Bros and their ICM Partners reps to work out the rights issues with the author’s estate. That just happened, and they have just closed their deals and will begin writing immediately.

“We want to do a very faithful but contemporized adaptation of the book, but our idea was to do it with all girls rather than boys,” Siegel told Deadline. “It is a timeless story that is especially relevant today, with the interpersonal conflicts and bullying, and the idea of children forming a society and replicating the behavior they saw in grownups before they were marooned.”

McGehee said the subject matter “is aggressively suspenseful, and taking the opportunity to tell it in a way it hasn’t been told before, with girls rather than boys, is that it shifts things in a way that might help people see the story anew. It breaks away from some of the conventions, the ways we think of boys and aggression. People still talk about the movie and the book from the standpoint of pure storytelling,” he said. “It is a great adventure story, real entertainment, but it has a lot of meaning embedded in it as well. We’ve gotten to think about this awhile as the rights were worked out, and we’re super eager to put pen to paper.”

upload_2017-8-31_9-3-41.png

upload_2017-8-31_9-3-56.png

upload_2017-8-31_9-4-11.png

upload_2017-8-31_9-4-24.png

upload_2017-8-31_9-4-46.png

upload_2017-8-31_9-5-13.png

upload_2017-8-31_9-5-46.png

upload_2017-8-31_9-5-58.png

 
That was unexpected: I thought the purists that didn't want another "female [X]" to be made would be featured, but it's just people mad that the writers are male? Ok...

Also:


TL;DW: In one season of the Dutch version of "Survivor," the men and women were split and given their own islands. At the end of 8 days, the men had a "Cafe on the beach," while the women were stealing from each other and had not yet built a hut; the women approved of a tribe merger.
 
"they get powerful and wise" Has this motherfucker not seen how girls settle disagreements

You put two angry girls who hate each other together and they will go for the other's eyes or throat.

That was unexpected: I thought the purists that didn't want another "female [X]" to be made would be featured, but it's just people mad that the writers are male? Ok...

Also:


TL;DW: In one season of the Dutch version of "Survivor," the men and women were split and given their own islands. At the end of 8 days, the men had a "Cafe on the beach," while the women were stealing from each other and had not yet built a hut; the women approved of a tribe merger.
I love this episode.
 
I remember back in middle school we had a discussion about whether the events of the book would be any different if they were all girls and if you understood the message of the book the answer is ultimately no

The book is not about the patrichary nor is it about anything related to gender at all, it's about the downfall of society and how we became naught but cruel beasts when we reject civility and order (as seen with how the two groups slowly begin to devolve into savages after the destruction of the conch and the murder of Piggy)

If it wasn't overt enough 'Lord of the Flies' is one of many titles for Beelzebub, meaning the pig's head might just be representive of the devil himself

tl;dr anybody who says having girls instead of boys in the movie misses the point of the book should probably re-read it
 
No matter what these guys do, they're going to be wrong, and they're going to get savaged. They can either ignore reality and substitute a politically-correct one, alienating the viewers and making at best a mediocre film; or they can embrace reality and piss off the large plurality of the population not ready to admit that female humans are just as flawed as male humans. And that doesn't even an audience's reaction to violence done on little girls.

This makes no sense from a business perspective, much less a filmmaking one. It's essentially going swimming in a shark tank wearing trunks made of raw steak.
 
You know they're, like, middle school kids in the book, right?

Which only made it more horrifying when they started murdering each other and fucking a pig up the ass with a makeshift dildo.

In fact, the whole book was showing what would happen if you stripped all civilization and civilizing influences away from people (a bunch of young boys in the original book) who would otherwise turn on each other if you didn't and showed the terrible results.

With that in mind, I hope the cast is packed to the gills with SJW stereotypes and it follows the original plot as faithfully as possible anyway, the salt geysers would breach the atmosphere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back