- Joined
- Aug 7, 2016
Yeah. With terrorism and Brexit underway you'd think they have bigger fish to fry...but noInstead of working on England's obvious terrorism issue, this is what they do instead?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah. With terrorism and Brexit underway you'd think they have bigger fish to fry...but noInstead of working on England's obvious terrorism issue, this is what they do instead?
With great difficultyHow the fuck do you put up with this?
Conservatives have a long history of wanting to control the internet and will use just about any excuse to do so, including hurt feels and terrorism, but hey we gotta spend that £350m a week on something right?This 'initiative' is from the Conservatives and has been applauded in the Conservative press.
I'm 95% mobile and I've used Private Internet Access for about 6 months and haven't had any issue with it. It's pretty cheap if you buy a year subscription. You'll know if it's working if there's a little key next in the corner of your screen.Well, shit.
Any advice for a VPN switch?
Particularly mobile. I'm not a tech savvy person, halp.
I can also vouch for Private Internet Access if you're looking for a VPN, I've been using it for about 6 months and it works great on mobile.
Yeah. With terrorism and Brexit underway you'd think they have bigger fish to fry...but no
Conservatives have a long history of wanting to control the internet and will use just about any excuse to do so, including hurt feels and terrorism, but hey we gotta spend that £350m a week on something right?
Eh, I'm only expecting dangerhairs to take this broadly and use it for narrow reasons "those dirty dang facts hurt muh feels!".I've been reading a particular article, it appears the more direct and organised attacks on people are what they will be prosecuting over.
Other than that it is also mentioned that the creators of any derogatory artwork aimed at an individual will be prosecuted.
By technicality I use neither.
Additionally within the first few sentences of an article it says (and I quote):
The director of public prosecutions said it means the CPS would prosecute just as if offences occurred offline.
But she stressed this did not mean prosecutors could "stifle free speech".
So there's some remnants of hope I guess, providing the person has done something shitty or validation can be drawn from the attacks then it falls in a grey area.
Aforementioned article:
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-37601431