Social Justice Warriors

[Ti-99/4A]

Though it's a bit old hat now, there's always one thing that I found terribly confusing about this whole #shutdown4chan kerfuffle. Specifically, if they wanted to rid the interwebs of racism, sexism, etc, then why 4chan? Why not stormfront, wizardchan, or literally any anti-child, gay, etc. blog or forum? If nothing else, Stormfront really was sticking it's fat 3-foot ass right in their faces, and they walked right by

Because they don't really want to rid the interweb of all that, nor do they want to rid real life of it. If all of that disappeared, they'd have nothing to bitch about and have to get real jobs or at least a new hobby.

 

[Burned Man]

Because they don't really want to rid the interweb of all that, nor do they want to rid real life of it. If all of that disappeared, they'd have nothing to bitch about and have to get real jobs or at least a new hobby.

Social Justice Warriors will always find something to complain and victimize themselves about. Their goal should be to make themselves obsolete and disbanding of their organizations due to having achieved their goals. I believe that there are still some SJWs that are fighting for their causes in appropriate methods but do to the trendiness and acceptance they preached it opened the floodgates of stupidity and low self esteem turning a rational band of civil right types into a bunch childish hug me now everything isn't my fault types. Slowly the civil rights types accomplish their goals and retire but the SJWs push on finding new injustice to cry at and shame hoping to not get triggered by their constantly expanding list of no no words.

 

[Ryan Rash]

Brother, one of my friends is now a SJW/Tranny/etc... He shares every fucking Huffington Post Women and Cher status update there is and always posts about princesses and shit.

I feel for ya on that one. I had a friend who practically went full-SJW after transitioning. The only time she posts on the forum we both frequent is to post vids of Anita Sarkeesian's trope hating bunk.

 

[StallChaser]

[youtube]dyeglUo3jgw[/youtube]

 

[Beef Thunderpants]

I played Syberia and Syberia II for hundreds of hours in order to control my rape urges, but now I just want to ravage every steam punk automaton train conductor I see.

Let me start...

How many of these sea hags support male genital mutilation because omg ant eaters are gross?

Good question. Breast cancer is far deadlier than testicular cancer, so that helps explain the greater attention, but I don't see much difference in male and female circumcision when you look at it objectively.

 

[cluelessly]

I played Syberia and Syberia II for hundreds of hours in order to control my rape urges, but now I just want to ravage every steam punk automaton train conductor I see.


Good question. Breast cancer is far deadlier than testicular cancer, so that helps explain the greater attention, but I don't see much difference in male and female circumcision when you look at it objectively.

Depends what kind of circumcision you're talking about. Most of the time in countries where female circumcision is a thing it basically means "butchering parts off that make it impossible for them to ever enjoy sex".

If we're just talking some aesthetic snip snip that's different, but that's not what female circumcision usually means. Say what you want about male circumcision but it isn't meant to render the penis or the nerves useless.

EDIT: After remembering what the topic is actually about I'm pretty sure you're talking about the cosmetic snipsnip and not the mutilating kind, in which case yeah there's not much difference, especially since most women get the cosmetic circumcision done in adulthood on their own merit rather than having it forced on them as a baby.

 

[Chikinballs]

Depends what kind of circumcision you're talking about. Most of the time in countries where female circumcision is a thing it basically means "butchering parts off that make it impossible for them to ever enjoy sex".

If we're just talking some aesthetic snip snip that's different, but that's not what female circumcision usually means. Say what you want about male circumcision but it isn't meant to render the penis or the nerves useless.

EDIT: After remembering what the topic is actually about I'm pretty sure you're talking about the cosmetic snipsnip and not the mutilating kind, in which case yeah there's not much difference, especially since most women get the cosmetic circumcision done in adulthood on their own merit rather than having it forced on them as a baby.

the fuck it isnt. it was introduced by the kellog cereal guy to curb masturbation, i just read an article by some jewish lady who said it was to remind men not to rape, and some jew ages ago whos name escapes me said the point was to weaken the penis without rendering it useless. it has long been a punishment for children who masturbate, and it desensitizes the entire penis.

but fuck all that, cutting a baby's genitals is wrong, no matter the gender or degree.

radical feminists are all about cutting baby boys. its fucking sick.

 

[cluelessly]

the fuck it isnt. it was introduced by the kellog cereal guy to curb masturbation, i just read an article by some jewish lady who said it was to remind men not to rape, and some jew ages ago whos name escapes me said the point was to weaken the penis without rendering it useless. it has long been a punishment for children who masturbate, and it desensitizes the entire penis.

but fuck all that, cutting a baby's genitals is wrong, no matter the gender or degree.

radical feminists are all about cutting baby boys. its fucking sick.

That's kind of weird because it doesn't seem to be successful in preventing those things, at least not for the most part. The men I've known who were circumcised still masturbated etc. I'm guessing like with female circumcision there's a difference between the harmful version and the aesthetic version.

Either way no one should be messing with a kids genitals, of course. I was just pointing out that having your clitoris and all your extremities lopped off is different from having some foreskin removed. It's wrong either way but it's still different.

 

[Ryan Rash]

The issue with female circumcision is that the end result of it has a greater impact on women than on men. If a man is circumcised, his penis remains fully functional and capable of carrying out coitus. Female circumcision, as has been said earlier, severely dulls sexual sensation.

This is aside from the fact that the only kinds of people who perform them these days are back-alley surgeons, since shit's illegal.

Also, someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but I think it's a lot harder to circumcise a woman than a man. The clitoris is quite small compared to the typical penis.

 

[Chikinballs]

The issue with female circumcision is that the end result of it has a greater impact on women than on men. If a man is circumcised, his penis remains fully functional and capable of carrying out coitus. Female circumcision, as has been said earlier, severely dulls sexual sensation.

This is aside from the fact that the only kinds of people who perform them these days are back-alley surgeons, since shit's illegal.

Also, someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but I think it's a lot harder to circumcise a woman than a man. The clitoris is quite small compared to the typical penis.

The issue is cutting the genitals of babies.

 

[Papaya23]

The issue with female circumcision is that the end result of it has a greater impact on women than on men. If a man is circumcised, his penis remains fully functional and capable of carrying out coitus. Female circumcision, as has been said earlier, severely dulls sexual sensation.

This is aside from the fact that the only kinds of people who perform them these days are back-alley surgeons, since shit's illegal.

Also, someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but I think it's a lot harder to circumcise a woman than a man. The clitoris is quite small compared to the typical penis.

Or you can just allow people to have their own bodies. I've been ejected from my share of feminist circles for pointing out their pro-mutilation bullshit. It's the best litmus test for which SJW's think about what they're saying and which ones just stand around drooling until they're handed something to say.

 

[Joey Jo-Jo Junior]

Gay porn on 4chan? Oh noes..

 

[Organic Fapcup]

Gay porn on 4chan? Oh noes..

>create accounts
>4chan
topkek

 

[Cwckifan]

The issue with female circumcision is that the end result of it has a greater impact on women than on men. If a man is circumcised, his penis remains fully functional and capable of carrying out coitus. Female circumcision, as has been said earlier, severely dulls sexual sensation.

This is aside from the fact that the only kinds of people who perform them these days are back-alley surgeons, since shit's illegal.

Also, someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but I think it's a lot harder to circumcise a woman than a man. The clitoris is quite small compared to the typical penis.

Isn't ED a common result of male circumcision?

 

[Ryan Rash]

Isn't ED a common result of male circumcision?

I dunno, really. My pecker's still working fine, if nothing else.

 

[StallChaser]

Isn't ED a common result of male circumcision?

Not really. It gets rid of a bunch of nerve endings, but it doesn't fundamentally screw up the functioning of the organ on the same level as female genital mutilation. The bigger issue is that of taking away someone's choice of what they're doing with their own body.

Or you can just allow people to have their own bodies. I've been ejected from my share of feminist circles for pointing out their pro-mutilation bullshit. It's the best litmus test for which SJW's think about what they're saying and which ones just stand around drooling until they're handed something to say.

You should ask these anti-choice women why they think people shouldn't be able to choose what they do with their own bodies, and watch their heads explode.

 

[c-no]

Not really. It gets rid of a bunch of nerve endings, but it doesn't fundamentally screw up the functioning of the organ on the same level as female genital mutilation. The bigger issue is that of taking away someone's choice of what they're doing with their own body.

That would be the issue with circumcision since there are circumcisions that are done with the consent of the individual getting circumcised.

http://tenaflyviper.tumblr.com/post/91422651735/yep-youre-right-you-probably-will-because
Basically, the image the tumblr replies to says "I do not want some CIS-Scum male as my gynecologist because he is a creep". Just read it and you'll know what I mean.

As an edit, some related thing to the 4Chan Tumblr thing:
http://tenaflyviper.tumblr.com/post/91406522455/viktorry-tenaflyviper-horsenews

 

[Burned Man]

http://tenaflyviper.tumblr.com/post/91422651735/yep-youre-right-you-probably-will-because
Basically, the image the tumblr replies to says "I do not want some CIS-Scum male as my gynecologist because he is a creep". Just read it and you'll know what I mean.

Yeah males with interest in Vaginas are the creepiest. Those CIS-Scum male heterosexual men creep me out. I would rather die than visit a male doctor. You would think that stupidity like that would slowly kill people like this off but they always survive unfortunately.

 

[Cwckifan]

You should ask these anti-choice women why they think people shouldn't be able to choose what they do with their own bodies, and watch their heads explode.

Something about killing innocent babies, I think? Also, there are different types of female circumcision, and all procedures have different effects. After all, if a guy suffers lifelong ED/pain/dullnessas a result of circumcision, then what's the difference? No need for a game of misery dicks

 

[Butta Face Lopez]

Yeah males with interest in Vaginas are the creepiest. Those CIS-Scum male heterosexual men creep me out. I would rather die than visit a male doctor. You would think that stupidity like that would slowly kill people like this off but they always survive unfortunately.