Science Man forced to pay child support for a child that DNA tests proved is not his

A Colorado man who spent 11 years believing he had fathered a daughter with his ex-wife is now fighting to stop paying child support after discovering the girl isn’t actually his.

Chris Atkins, 48, is legally obliged to pay $730 each month to his ex wife, Lori Lonnquist, despite a DNA test recently proving he is not the child’s father.

Atkins says he had only been dating Lonnquist a ‘short time’ when she told him she was pregnant.

The two married in 2000 before the child was born, but split up two and a half years later, with Atkins paying child support ever since.

However during a fight, Lonnquist blurted out that the girl did not belong to Atkins, setting in motion a nasty parental rights battle, Fox 31 reported.

Atkins daughter is now 15, however he says he has not been allowed to see her for four years.

He says that while the courts can force him to pay child support, he is still not allowed visitation.

‘It doesn’t make any sense to me,’ Atkins told Fox 31.

‘I just want my daughter, but I can’t even see her, but yet I’m still paying child support. And the biological father has been found and he gets to spend time with her. I don’t get nothing.’

Lonnquist insisted Atkins abandoned any relationship with her daughter when he learned she wasn’t biologically his. Atkins denied that and said Lonnquist refused to facilitate visits.

Furthermore she is trying to get him to relinquish his parental rights, so that her daughter can take the surname of Lonnquist’s current partner, who she will soon marry.

Lonnquist said she would agree to stop collecting child support from Atkins if he would agree to terminate his parental rights.

When asked if she was being greedy by Fox, Lonnquist said: ‘Maybe, but I don’t feel bad about it, I really don’t.’

Legal experts say the process to give up parental rights is cumbersome, because it requires someone to step in and have their name recorded on the birth certificate.

The obvious choice would be the girl’s biological father, however he is not willing.

Atkins says he will continue to fight, but does not know what the outcome will be.

‘You know, I don’t want pity, I just want everybody to know this is happening,’ he said.

‘It’s not right, it is not right.’

As it stands, Atkins is required to continue to pay child support for another four years, until the girl is 19.

Full Article
 
There’s nothing out of the ordinary here. Courts pretty much fucking hate fathers and get off on seeing them suffer. No doubt someone in charge was rocking at least half a chub when they found out this guy wasn’t the bio dad but still wanted visitation and paid child support. Judge was probably straight up doing this:
02EA2C4A-6E20-4C47-A7E6-5E482AC0EBCC.gif
“Oooh, you’re not the father? Well, they probably rely on that child support so we’re gonna need you to go ahead and keeeep paying that. You want visitation? Well you’re not actually her dad so that wouldn’t make much sense would it. She’s with her real father and we don’t wanna confuse her now doooo we.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I understand in many US states people are not considered adults until they are 18 years old (despite it really being 21 for alcohol and other things) so how can someone pay "child" support for someone 18+? Let alone one that isn't your daughter, and you aren't allowed to see?

Most teens are able to hold part time jobs to make their own cash and by age 18 there's a good chance she'd probably be out the house or in college.
 
A Colorado man who spent 11 years believing he had fathered a daughter with his ex-wife is now fighting to stop paying child support after discovering the girl isn’t actually his.

Chris Atkins, 48, is legally obliged to pay $730 each month to his ex wife, Lori Lonnquist, despite a DNA test recently proving he is not the child’s father.

Atkins says he had only been dating Lonnquist a ‘short time’ when she told him she was pregnant.

The two married in 2000 before the child was born, but split up two and a half years later, with Atkins paying child support ever since.

However during a fight, Lonnquist blurted out that the girl did not belong to Atkins, setting in motion a nasty parental rights battle, Fox 31 reported.

Atkins daughter is now 15, however he says he has not been allowed to see her for four years.

He says that while the courts can force him to pay child support, he is still not allowed visitation.

‘It doesn’t make any sense to me,’ Atkins told Fox 31.

‘I just want my daughter, but I can’t even see her, but yet I’m still paying child support. And the biological father has been found and he gets to spend time with her. I don’t get nothing.’

Lonnquist insisted Atkins abandoned any relationship with her daughter when he learned she wasn’t biologically his. Atkins denied that and said Lonnquist refused to facilitate visits.

Furthermore she is trying to get him to relinquish his parental rights, so that her daughter can take the surname of Lonnquist’s current partner, who she will soon marry.

Lonnquist said she would agree to stop collecting child support from Atkins if he would agree to terminate his parental rights.

When asked if she was being greedy by Fox, Lonnquist said: ‘Maybe, but I don’t feel bad about it, I really don’t.’

Legal experts say the process to give up parental rights is cumbersome, because it requires someone to step in and have their name recorded on the birth certificate.

The obvious choice would be the girl’s biological father, however he is not willing.

Atkins says he will continue to fight, but does not know what the outcome will be.

‘You know, I don’t want pity, I just want everybody to know this is happening,’ he said.

‘It’s not right, it is not right.’

As it stands, Atkins is required to continue to pay child support for another four years, until the girl is 19.

Full Article
Kill the cunt and the child. There, protest made and problem solved. Kill the Judge too.
 
Women got work and property rights but the law system is still stuck on this patriarcal idea that only the man is capable to guarantee sustain for the children, and so he must do it no matter what because women are weak and can only do small imbecile jobs. How oppressive
 
Women got work and property rights but the law system is still stuck on this patriarcal idea that only the man is capable to guarantee sustain for the children, and so he must do it no matter what because women are weak and can only do small imbecile jobs. How oppressive
Agreed. Chauvinistic systems like alimony and child support are outdated in a year as current as this.
 
Three steps forward, one step back. I can't say that society is better off with any of those people in it. Truth be told, a judge like that has to be gotten rid of for the good of the community. Hate to say it, but I'm on-board with Edgy McEdgelord.
lol there are so many judges who make rulings like this it’s absurd. It’s honestly frustrating to see stories like this because as glad as I am when news outlets give these stories attention, nothing substantial is ever done to change the laws that allow this kind of shit, because the moment that discussion starts the narrative gets spun that someone wants to put “deadbeat dads” ahead of the best interest of children and the general public just goes along with it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You could do mass genocide or you could impose judges to respect the laws more literally and impersonally since that's their goddamn job, also get rid of the people jury, seriously why the fuck is that even a thing
 
I understand in many US states people are not considered adults until they are 18 years old (despite it really being 21 for alcohol and other things) so how can someone pay "child" support for someone 18+? Let alone one that isn't your daughter, and you aren't allowed to see?

Most teens are able to hold part time jobs to make their own cash and by age 18 there's a good chance she'd probably be out the house or in college.

Becuase that is the rules, often in the case where it hasn't gone to court, the State pays child support and you are obligated for whatever the State paid. In Maryland they attempted to force child support payments until the age of 21 if the child was going to College. This failed twice.

Ask me about my child enforcement payment nightmare.
 
You think this is bad, you should see what happens to married guys who get cucked. Even getting the court to agree to DNA testing takes an act of god, as the court is fully satisfied that if the woman is married, the husband is always the assumed father. The court will resist any and all attempts to complicate that situation.
 
Back