Daddies and Littles - Child Abuse Fetish

[DildoGaggins]

"In Japan the age of consent is 13." Is half true. You won't find a prefecture where the age of consent is 13, but 13 is lowest that their national government allows.

The age of consent in Japan is not technically 13 in the same way we have statutory rape laws. The "13" law is usually spread because of people not putting much into research, and thinking "How cool!". As a man you cannot have intercourse with anyone more than 2 years younger than you if your around 18. It's honestly really stupid how much weebs and other degenerates (Allison) spread false info because of surface level research.

Edit- Also, from what I can remember the "13" rule stereotype started from the general Japanese rule that if both parties are 13 that it is legal for intercourse and that technically by their legal standards that could be considered an "age of consent".

 

[Shit Waifu]

The age of consent in Japan is not technically 13 in the same way we have statutory rape laws. The "13" law is usually spread because of people not putting much into research, and thinking "How cool!". As a man you cannot have intercourse with anyone more than 2 years younger than you if your around 18. It's honestly really stupid how much weebs and other degenerates (Allison) spread false info because of surface level research.

Edit- Also, from what I can remember the "13" rule stereotype started from the general Japanese rule that if both parties are 13 that it is legal for intercourse and that technically by their legal standards that could be considered an "age of consent".View attachment 296336

doesn’t the law also depend on prefecture/city/area as well? As in, the prefectures have their own ages of consent and those override the “national” statutes? That might be another misconception, but it’s a tidbit I remember reading somewhere.

 

[DildoGaggins]

doesn’t the law also depend on prefecture/city/area as well? As in, the prefectures have their own ages of consent and those override the “national” statutes? That might be another misconception, but it’s a tidbit I remember reading somewhere.

Yes, each prefecture is different. But if I remember correctly there remains the general rule of 2 years age difference, and at most 3 years.

I'm trying to figure out a way to explain this considering the confusing nature of these laws. But under general and all encompassing rule if you as a male that are over 14 have sex with a female under 13, that is by their laws statutory rape and you will be tried as a felon. Because 13 is their baseline for consent it means that if parents consenting say that their daughter 13+ can be in a relationship with someone their age or older then it is permitted. But if not it is tried as a misdemeanor, and in most cases is.

 

[Dysnomia]

Lolitas actually despise the DDLG community, because littles get fascinated so easily by the cuteness of it all but then transform the Lolita style into a sexual perversion, bringing around all the abusive stuff that comes with it. They hate hate hate being associated with them. If this girl made it clear she was a little, those tea parties would end real quick.
Source: A friend who's big on Lolita.

I like the kuro and classic stuff. The sweet looks like something a three year old would wear to a birthday though.

It's unfortunate that the name of the fashion is associated with lolita in that context by people who don't know what the fashion actually is. I know they try to distance themselves from that. If you're into this DDLG crap keep it to yourself. If you like Daddy's cummies in your burando it's best not to associate it with your lolita community.

However, so many fetishists of all sorts are extremely vocal and seem to think everyone wants to hear about their kink. So I imagine it's caused some very awkward situations from time to time.

 

[A.Shitposter]

I think this all could have been avoided if Japanese people hadn't named their fashion subculture after a novel about a creepy pedo for whatever fucking reason they did.

 

[takemetoyourgrave]

I think this all could have been avoided if Japanese people hadn't named their fashion subculture after a novel about a creepy pedo for whatever fucking reason they did.

Eh, entire essays have been written about the naming of lolita and why it got that name, etc. General consensus is that the original japanese girls to start the fashion just thought lolita was a cute western name and just slapped it on. It's not uncommon for random english words to get shoved into titles, brand names, onto clothes, or just into conversation to sound cool

 

[LtCucumber]

I think this all could have been avoided if Japanese people hadn't named their fashion subculture after a novel about a creepy pedo for whatever fucking reason they did.

To be honest you think that's bad, go on the nymphet tag on tumblr... It's a headache. I've read parts of the book Lolita and watched the movie by Kubrick and can't get my head around why they're romanticizing the story at all.

 

[Meowthkip]

Eh, entire essays have been written about the naming of lolita and why it got that name, etc. General consensus is that the original japanese girls to start the fashion just thought lolita was a cute western name and just slapped it on. It's not uncommon for random english words to get shoved into titles, brand names, onto clothes, or just into conversation to sound cool

No lie, a friend of mine from high school procured a packet of Japanese gum that, for no reason whatsoever, just had the words "flaming disco wolf" on the side of the packaging. It wasn't even the name of the product.

Engrish, man.

 

[vertexwindi]

No lie, a friend of mine from high school procured a packet of Japanese gum that, for no reason whatsoever, just had the words "flaming disco wolf" on the side of the packaging. It wasn't even the name of the product.

Engrish, man.

It's like getting Chinese tattoos, except the other way around. I've seen Japanese kids wearing English swear words on their clothing.

Either way, the Lolita fashion community is doing a decent job excluding littles from what I can see.

 

[Infidel]

To be honest you think that's bad, go on the nymphet tag on tumblr... It's a headache. I've read parts of the book Lolita and watched the movie by Kubrick and can't get my head around why they're romanticizing the story at all.

I've read and studied the book and both movies (there was another one made in 1997 that was... interestingly close to the novel)
Trust me when I say these people haven't actually read Lolita and are only cherrypicking at the nicely-laced quotes and related 40s-50s (pre)teen girl aesthetic. The closest they'll get is watching the '97 movie (if they can sit through it) and obsessing over early Lana Del Rey albums.

Lana del Rey and Vladimir Nabokov don't deserve this

 

[LtCucumber]

I've read and studied the book and both movies (there was another one made in 1997 that was... interestingly close to the novel)
Trust me when I say these people haven't actually read Lolita and are only cherrypicking at the nicely-laced quotes and related 40s-50s (pre)teen girl aesthetic. The closest they'll get is watching the '97 movie (if they can sit through it) and obsessing over early Lana Del Rey albums.

Lana del Rey and Vladimir Nabokov don't deserve this

Isn't the content of the movie very heavily watered down because of how controversial the book actually is? In the book didn't Humbert try to drug and rape Lolita? I don't know a lot about the book and may be wrong i'm just going on the parts i read and what people have told me.

It seems like they don't even watch the movie and post gifs from it. I've seen a fair few quotes used out of context.

 

[UnclePhil]

Isn't the content of the movie very heavily watered down because of how controversial the book actually is? In the book didn't Humbert try to drug and rape Lolita? I don't know a lot about the book and may be wrong i'm just going on the parts i read and what people have told me.

It seems like they don't even watch the movie and post gifs from it. I've seen a fair few quotes used out of context.

Lolita the book has always been misunderstood. Vladimir Nabokov wasn't glorifying pedophilia, nor was he glamorizing the idea of jailbait girls bewitching middle-aged men. There was never supposed to be a 'mystery' about who was playing and seducing who during the road trip. Humbert Humbert was meant to be a despicable piece of shit who kidnapped, raped, and transported a victim across state lines. Nabokov was writing from the point-of-view of a character he, in fact, hated. Writing about people, paraphilias and perversions he hated was Nabakov's thing. See also: his novel about incest and his other one about homos.

Kubrick watered down a shitload of the source material, but it was Kubrick's movie that made Dolores Haze/Lolita the poster child for the underaged seductress, mythologizing her that way within popular culture for over 50 years. The '97 version tried to rectify that misconception, but it's too late for the damage to be reversed. Lolita will always be remembered as a jaibait slut instead of the victim she was intended to be, as the image and name continues being perpetuated through dress styles, art styles, kinks, fetishes, and contemporary lexicons.

 

[LtCucumber]

Lolita the book has always been misunderstood. Vladimir Nabokov wasn't glorifying pedophilia, nor was he glamorizing the idea of jailbait girls bewitching middle-aged men. There was never supposed to be a 'mystery' about who was playing and seducing who during the road trip. Humbert Humbert was meant to be a despicable piece of shit who kidnapped, raped, and transported a victim across state lines. Nabokov was writing from the point-of-view of a character he, in fact, hated. Writing about people, paraphilias and perversions he hated was Nabakov's thing. See also: his novel about incest and his other one about homos.

Kubrick watered down a shitload of the source material, but it was Kubrick's movie that made Dolores Haze/Lolita the poster child for the underaged seductress, mythologizing her that way within popular culture for over 50 years. The '97 version tried to rectify that misconception, but it's too late for the damage to be reversed. Lolita will always be remembered as a jaibait slut instead of the victim she was intended to be, as the image and name continues being perpetuated through dress styles, art styles, kinks, fetishes, and contemporary lexicons.

My guess is due to the controversy, Kubrick probably had to water it down. I mean most know about what happened after the release of A Clockwork Orange about a century later. But watering it down, due to the subject matter I'm not fully surprised at. It's the same with any movie about an underage character, and there are probably a few out there that made waves other than Lolita. I see so many people online having the moodboard of 50's attire, heart shaped sunglasses, etc. Tagged #lolita and #nymphet and other such things. There's so many "Minor Attracted People" (aka pedophiles) on tumblr they'd have a fucking field day on the nymphet tag.
The definition of "nymphet" depending on which site you use, is disturbing to think of when you realise there's a 14 year old tumblr girl thinking "that's the label for me!"

The bigger issue is the teacher crush community (10/10 would not recommend) which isn't as crazy as it was a while ago, but some, mostly underage bloggers, idolize Dolores Haze (Kubrick's portrayal) and tries to follow in her footsteps as if she's someone who likes to seduce older men. My guess is the book portrays her differently? (though like I said, i haven't read it in it's entirety, I may be wrong). And wanting to seduce older men? It's a pretty dangerous mentality to have, especially if you're underage. Teacher or not, it could put someone in a harmful situation. Not only for them, if the older person turns out to be very manipulative. If someone starts coming onto their teacher it could ruin their life and their teacher's. I will be real here, a majority of the community doesn't like to be associated with "nymphets" and some even say not to make a move on your teacher, but nymphets are a fan of the teacher crush community and would think "if i dress in sexy 50s attire and look cute and act mature my teacher will want me".

 

[Polexia Aphrodisia]

My guess is the book portrays her differently?

She's the one who initiates sex with Humbert first but its because she had been sexually experimenting at summer camp and she was a pretty fucking troubled kid. While any other adult would have shoved her away and gotten her into therapy, Humbert reciprocates and takes it as grounds for a full fledged sexual relationship where he constantly rapes her and has no regard for her emotional well being.

 

[UnclePhil]

She's the one who initiates sex with Humbert first but its because she had been sexually experimenting at summer camp and she was a pretty fucking troubled kid. While any other adult would have shoved her away and gotten her into therapy, Humbert reciprocates and takes it as grounds for a full fledged sexual relationship where he constantly rapes her and has no regard for her emotional well being.

Also after fucking her, he conveniently reveals her mom is dead.

 

[takemetoyourgrave]

She's the one who initiates sex with Humbert first but its because she had been sexually experimenting at summer camp and she was a pretty fucking troubled kid. While any other adult would have shoved her away and gotten her into therapy, Humbert reciprocates and takes it as grounds for a full fledged sexual relationship where he constantly rapes her and has no regard for her emotional well being.

Humbert is also quite often considered an unreliable narrator as in he lies, doesn't always tell the whole truth, or spins things from his POV. Im sure in their minds, quite a lot of pedophiles believe what they're doing is ok

 

[LtCucumber]

Humbert is also quite often considered an unreliable narrator as in he lies, doesn't always tell the whole truth, or spins things from his POV. Im sure in their minds, quite a lot of pedophiles believe what they're doing is ok

So as we think about it, for all we know the character of Humbert may even be lying or stretching the truth about her "initiating" anything with him. Maybe she did, but maybe she did something that he misread as her initiating something, or he could be flat out lying? Her initiating something with him when she was a minor and he was a grown man is pretty ick. But him reciprocating puts him in the wrong also. For all we know they could both be in the wrong or he did something but lied about it so it sounds like she wanted him.

I doubt it's that deep but with what you said it brought something new to the table. Just a theory really.

The weird part is the 13-15 year old "nymphets" with a daddy kink on tumblr want to persue older men because of the story of Lolita. That's fucking gross (though they probably take the story out of context). Anyone initiates sex with a 14 year old, as an adult; they're a pedophile. But of course to the starstruck kids trying to seduce these older men it's fine and would probably be too blinded by love to notice anything wrong as a lot of teens do. They can say they're mature all they like but the brain doesn't stop developing until mid 20s.

 

[Dangerhair]

I can't decide if this thread is more the stuff that:

If I ever have kids, I tell them that if any adult says this shit to them or tries to touch them, forget saying "stop, don't, no", you bite their hand/punch them in the face/ kick them in the groin as hard as you can, run as fast as you can yelling "fire" and don't stop until you get to an adult you trust.

OR

Stuff the judge hears before he/she orders DD remanded into custody prior to the trial.

You know when it's said like that I wonder why the 50s housewife aesthetic isn't more appealing to these people, if they simply want to avoid responsibility and refute accusations of pedophilia.
50s housewife has no responsibilities outside the house but is still treated like a (young) adult woman, even in a patronising way.

The problem with that is that the 1950s North American housewife had all the responsibility at home.

People got married younger then, and it wasn't uncommon to have 3, 4, or 5 kids.

As a 1950s housewife, you'd have to be up before your husband, do your hair and makeup, get your 4 kids up and ready for school, and then make your husband a hot breakfast from scratch, and his lunch for work.

After seeing him off to work, you'd have to do errands. There were no 24 hour Walmarts back then, so you'd have to take your husband's suits to the cleaners (one for each day of the week, naturally), then go to the supermarket to get food to make for dinner, then to the department store for vacuum cleaner bags, and then back home.

Then, you'd scarf down lunch quickly, and do laundry for all 6 people in your house, vacuum, polish the furniture and baseboards, and get dinner started.

Then, your kids would be home from school, so you'd have to get them doing their homework and wash up for dinner.

Then, you'd cook dinner, making sure it's ready for when your husband got home, and that it's something all 6 people in your house like.

After that, you'd do the dishes and clean up, help the kids with their homework, and maybe get to talk to your husband, call your mom, or just relax for a couple hours before getting the kids to bed and getting some sleep yourself.

Then do it all again the next day.

 

[Don't Call Anybody]

It looks like the "underage little" thing got really out of hand in Texas this week.

The girl has been located and is safe, but holy hell the note she left when she ran away.

 

[jurassic bark]

It looks like the "underage little" thing got really out of hand in Texas this week.

The girl has been located and is safe, but holy hell the note she left when she ran away.

Is there a big Mexican tumblr Papi subculture?