- Joined
- Apr 26, 2017
Nah. Gays are transgressors by nature. They like to push boundaries and make themselves the central show but sick motherfuckers exist everywhere. Gays are just more visible.
Plagued Pedophiles and pedophilia apologists - Dear NSA agent reading this thread: WE DON'T CONDONE THIS
- Thread starter Cosmos
- Start date
- Status
Nah. Gays are transgressors by nature. They like to push boundaries and make themselves the central show but sick motherfuckers exist everywhere. Gays are just more visible.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
No. Precisely because of what you said. American society is becoming increasingly socially libertarian. You do your thing, and it's ok as long as it doesn't violate someone else's rights. Pedos are trying like mad to hitch their wagon to the LGBT movement, and they've been trying for years, but the mainstream gay rights people tell them to fuck off every time. The people who wanna fuck 14-year-olds move the goal posts by screaming it's not pedophilia, and strictly speaking, it isn't, but meaning changes over time, and pedophile has become a catch-all term for someone who is an adult attracted to those below the age of consent. So yes, the idiot who was just banned is a pedophile.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Gays are actually normies now at this point to the extent they're detested by the troon double dildo wielding psycho with a rainbow mohawk crowd, and even lesbians are hated for not wanting to suck "girl penis."
He was, admittedly, right to the extent that there were and are bandwagoners who want to ride that toboggan all the way down the slippery slope, but the same people who were and are totally okay with what goes on between consenting adults are still not okay if you want to ram that dildo up their own asses without permission, or fuck kids.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
No.
First, Santorum's an idiot*, and that's only one of the dumbass things he's said. Second, gay people have not been found to be more likely to be attracted to children than straight people.
Granted, NAMBLA and their ilk will try to portray themselves as victims of homophobia, and you'll have have some cows on the extreme fringe who agree, but by and large, they're the exception.
Are there people who are gay who are pedophiles? Of course. But the key definition of a pedophile is someone who's attracted to children. Not someone who's the same sex. Who they're attracted to as an adult has nothing to do with it. And while some child molestors are only attracted to boys, or girls, it still has to do with them being a child first.
*Why do you think PA voted his sorry ass out of here? He's still hated around here.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Hmmmm, vote for a guy who's a child molestor, who one who successfully prosecuted the assholes responsible for the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing. Jesus wept.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
None of that happened in this thread though. It has to actually be in the thread for a thread to count as being infected. Like how we have GamerGaters in the GG thread or how the Furries general thread is entirely furries talking about other furries.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2017
Metokur said in one of his recent Sunday streams about people who want to have relationships with like children, not even like 14 year olds that he wondered what they would talk about, ie like are you just gonna have conversations about hello kitty? The intellectual difference between kids and adults is vast, which makes it really hard to believe its for the companionship.
A
AF 802
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Hmmmm, vote for a guy who's a child molestor, who one who successfully prosecuted the assholes responsible for the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing. Jesus wept.
I'd take that. Forget the child molestation part, that can be handled by someone else.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
I finally made my way through this thread, and it was a both horrifying and entertaining read. Especially Mr "I wanna fuck kids, but don't call me a pedo!"
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
Typically, the way pedos groom children and teens and talk about interests when they want a "relationship" with the child is a very narcissistic one (hardly surprising). The pedo thinks about things they were interested at when they were a similar age, or just beyond the age the target is at now. They expose the child to various media -- music, movies, etc. -- that the target will tend to see as a little bit mature but very influential. So you give a 12 year old boy who's into superheroes an Alan Moore comic, or you target a lonely 14 year old girl with The Cure and The Smiths.
Now there's a shared interest base that you can talk about, and the "best" part for the pedophile is, they can influence the kid into thinking exactly what they do about the piece of media in question. They get to form someone in their image, who will be totally into taking in whatever stuff their new awesome older friend shows them and who now becomes a mirror for all the ways they think about these same pieces of media. The mirroring seems to be highly important to a lot of groomer types, since maybe a lot of what they get off on is someone who is "just like them" when they feel like a misfit or outcast. After some initial media exposure, the pedophile may take things further with overtly sexualized media, or may just move the relationship into a more sexualized place while on the surface staying with "safe" subjects.
For them, it's important that the target not have any opinions too far different from their own, and that they make them see things from their perspective as soon as possible. Both of these priorities are enacted for both psychological and practical reasons, since kids are less likely to turn someone in that they feel like is the only person in the world who really understands them.
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
It's awfully hard to believe things like that when these people use pics of 8 year old boys as their avatars and spend all their time talking about how perfectly ok they are and how much they won't molest kids.
If you were genuinely a person who had attraction to minors but knew deeply that it was wrong, you'd keep that shit off the internet, make sure you never had contact with any children, never looked at photos or drawings of children (even innocent ones) intentionally, kept your distance from kids and never made conversation with them in public, et cetera.
To use a very strained analogy, it's like knowing you were a diabetic who was constantly fighting sugar cravings, then deciding to make your Twitter photo a big piece of cake, search Instagram all day for photos of caramel, and spend your time on Twitter posting that you know you can't eat it and you totally never would, but doesn't this recipe for fudge look scrumptious?
And then, to top it all off, having big screeds about how there should be big boards full of photos of sugary foods for diabetics to look at to help them have a better outlet for sugar cravings than just eating a big pile of sugar. Maybe diabetics should even have issued to them some plastic slices of cake so they can look at them and they can gnaw on the plastic when they get a craving. That should definitely work to help diabetics stay healthy, right?
If you were genuinely a person who had attraction to minors but knew deeply that it was wrong, you'd keep that shit off the internet, make sure you never had contact with any children, never looked at photos or drawings of children (even innocent ones) intentionally, kept your distance from kids and never made conversation with them in public, et cetera.
To use a very strained analogy, it's like knowing you were a diabetic who was constantly fighting sugar cravings, then deciding to make your Twitter photo a big piece of cake, search Instagram all day for photos of caramel, and spend your time on Twitter posting that you know you can't eat it and you totally never would, but doesn't this recipe for fudge look scrumptious?
And then, to top it all off, having big screeds about how there should be big boards full of photos of sugary foods for diabetics to look at to help them have a better outlet for sugar cravings than just eating a big pile of sugar. Maybe diabetics should even have issued to them some plastic slices of cake so they can look at them and they can gnaw on the plastic when they get a craving. That should definitely work to help diabetics stay healthy, right?
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid
This will all end in tears, I just know it.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
As disappointed as I am that this thread is infected, it's a relief to know it's not plagued.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2017
Give it time friend, give it time
Nazi vegeta
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2017
One Man Bland
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
Another analogy might also be someone going to a mall and announcing that they're a "no contact" non offending kleptomaniac and that people need to understand that they're urge to steal everything not nailed down is not their fault and that kleptomaniac=/=shoplifter and it's just sooo hard to live with that stigma, but they totally need to have shoplifting blogs to talk to other afflicted kleptos to help them cope (but never actually look into getting therapy goodness no) and that they should get jobs in retail and positions that leave them alone with the items they've expressed desires to steal
And then turn around and cry discrimination when stores kick them out because no one wants to take the risk of some "non-offending" yahoo
Either that or a supposedly recovering alcoholic insisting that they work in a bar and pushing to reduce the legal blood-alcohol content requirements police use to issue DUIs
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2017
I'm sure he's been talked about, but I wanna share my favourite paedophile from Australia.
Here's an interview from this year.
Here's an interview from this year.
xyrichard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2017
It looks like the typical argument for fucking kids goes like this:
1. Sorites paradox*
2. BRB, fucking kids
* If the age of consent is 16, for instance, should someone be punished for sleeping with someone 15 years 364 days? What about 15 years 363 days? 2.5?
1. Sorites paradox*
2. BRB, fucking kids
* If the age of consent is 16, for instance, should someone be punished for sleeping with someone 15 years 364 days? What about 15 years 363 days? 2.5?
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2017
There is a big problem with this subject, and it's how it always turns in to "you need to be castrated you sick fuck" whenever you make an argument on the 'wrong side'.
- Status