UN British Army drew up £500K proposal to scrap ‘Be the Best’ motto because it was ‘non-inclusive’ - Triggering my rifle.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5205232/british-army-proposal-scrap-be-the-best-motto/amp/

BARMY ARMY
British Army drew up £500K proposal to scrap ‘Be the Best’ motto because it was ‘non-inclusive’


The Be the Best slogan has been used since 1993, but market research has since found the message did not 'resonate' with the public

The British Army proposed scrapping its Be The Best logo over concerns it was too “elitist”.

In a move that would cost the taxpayer £520k, the Army drew up plans to phase out the current slogan, which has been used since 1993.

The historic crest of two crossed swords, a crown and a lion was also deemed “elitist” and “non-inclusive” according to market research.

But the plans have since been put on hold by the Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson, who is said to believe the British Army is the “best of the best”.

A Ministry of Defence spokesperson told The Sun Online: “The Defence Secretary believes that the British Army is the best of the best and has put these proposals on hold.”

The current logo was reportedly going to be replaced with a simple Union Jack, flying above “ARMY”.

The Daily Mail last night reported that a document was circulated by General Sir Nick Carter, the Chief of the General Staff, to senior officers, saying: “Market research in May 17 found that Be the Best did not resonate with many of our key audiences and was considered dated, elitist and non-inclusive.

“The ECAB [Executive Committee of the Army Board] therefore agreed that its use should be phased out as soon as affordably possible.

“The retirement of Be the Best will commence immediately with all planned refreshes of Be the Best branded material cancelled in favour of brand compliant products.”

Critics hit out at the change of course, with Colonel Richard Kemp, the former commander of UK troops in Afghanistan, saying: “Credibility is secured by our abilities on the battlefield, our fighting spirit and our resources.

And at a time when the defence budget is being squeezed, it is lunacy to squander money on a futile branding project.”

He added: “Be the Best is popular because it encapsulates the desire for our troops to be better than their enemies. It has never been about them looking down at anyone in society, so any suggestion it is elitist is nonsense.”

He was supported by Julian Lewis, chairman of the Commons Defence Select Committee, who said there was nothing to be ashamed of about the Be the Best slogan.

The Ministry of Defence said: “The Defence Secretary believes that the British Army is the best of the best and has put these proposals on hold.”

It comes after concerns were raised that Britain faced an “existential crisis” due to deep defence cuts.

In an extraordinary attack on ministers, former operations chief General Sir Richard Barrons claimed the Army is now “20 years out of date”.

But wait, it gets worse better!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/27/armed-forces-told-use-gender-neutral-language/amp/

Armed forces told to use gender-neutral language

Members of the armed forces are being told to avoid gendered language like "mankind" and "sportsmanship" in favour of neutral terms.

Guidelines are displayed in the toilets of a base which trains members of the Amy, Navy and RAF.

Among the suggestions is to use "ancestors" or "forebears" instead of forefathers.

It also offers "people, folks, friends" as alternatives to "chap".

Instead of "man in the street", it is suggested that military ranks might use "average citizen/person", and for "housewife" the guidance gives "shopper, homemaker".

"Sportsmanship" and "mankind" are to be replaced with "fairness, good humour" and "humanity, humankind, human race, people" respectively.

One soldier said the sign was "politically-correct". "It's the daftest thing ever," he told the Sun newspaper.


The guide was authored by the Joint Equality Diversity and Inclusion unit, or Jedi, as it is known to troops.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said: “We are continuously promoting a modern, inclusive, working environment to ensure individuals are recognised and feel valued.”

It comes after the Army backtracked over plans to drop the 'Be the Best' slogan. Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson blocked the rebranding proposal, after a leaked document described the slogan as "elitist".

"The Defence Secretary believes that the British Army is the best of the best and has put these proposals on hold," a spokesman for the MoD said on Sunday.
 
Reminds me of when the U.S. Army changed its recruiting slogan from "Be all that you can be" to the idiotic "Army of One" horseshit. What does that even mean? "Yeah, fuck teamwork, you're an army of one! Do whatever you want!" Now it's that generic corporate crap "Army Strong" which means fuck all. To the surprise of nobody, the changes cost billions of taxpayer dollars.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/9/20061009-104305-9882r/
"Meanwhile, the Army will roll out the big guns around Veterans Day, when an “Army Strong” advertising blitz commences on TV, radio and the Internet. The service retained New York-based ad agency McCann Worldgroup late last year to rework its image and outreach; the contract is worth $1 billion over the next four years."

Army Strong is the worst one yet. There was nothing at all wrong with Be All That You Can Be. But I guess it's a little too elitist. It implies that you actually have to try hard to be a good soldier. That's ableist. Today's youth doesn't want to try hard at anything. They just want to be handed their participation trophy so they can gloat on social media about how successful they are.

Army Strong sounds like a slogan for a product like tools or a heavy duty industrial cleaner.

When will the push for "muh inclusive language" end? It's already so exceptional sounding. We've got pregnant people and chest feeding. Now housewives are shoppers and forefathers are the antiquated and primitive sounding ancestors. Ancestors only really works if you are related to the dead people you are referring to.

It's starting to all sound very robotic. Like a machine that doesn't understand humanity is picking generic words to describe people.

Not everything has to be inclusive all the damn time. Stop worrying so much about feelings. People who stay all wishy washy over words aren't fit for army life anyway. Shouldn't you be weeding those people out instead of encouraging them to join up by catering to their overly sensitive fee fees?
 
Army Strong is the worst one yet. There was nothing at all wrong with Be All That You Can Be. But I guess it's a little too elitist. It implies that you actually have to try hard to be a good soldier. That's ableist. Today's youth doesn't want to try hard at anything. They just want to be handed their participation trophy so they can gloat on social media about how successful they are.

Army Strong sounds like a slogan for a product like tools or a heavy duty industrial cleaner.

When will the push for "muh inclusive language" end? It's already so exceptional sounding. We've got pregnant people and chest feeding. Now housewives are shoppers and forefathers are the antiquated and primitive sounding ancestors. Ancestors only really works if you are related to the dead people you are referring to.

It's starting to all sound very robotic. Like a machine that doesn't understand humanity is picking generic words to describe people.

Not everything has to be inclusive all the damn time. Stop worrying so much about feelings. People who stay all wishy washy over words aren't fit for army life anyway. Shouldn't you be weeding those people out instead of encouraging them to join up by catering to their overly sensitive fee fees?
Carlin, like /pol/, is always right.
 
In other news, the NHS will not be receiving a much needed £500K increase in funding. Isn't it lovely how government money always ends up in the most deserving hands?
 
In other news, the NHS will not be receiving a much needed £500K increase in funding. Isn't it lovely how government money always ends up in the most deserving hands?
It's gonna become bankrupt anyway because of the inbred Pakis producing Charles II of Spain tier children.
 
In other news, the NHS will not be receiving a much needed £500K increase in funding. Isn't it lovely how government money always ends up in the most deserving hands?
Maybe we should stop throwing money at pensioners and actually try to find ways to fund the NHS instead of cutting into a thousand pieces.
 

Attachments

  • 1920px-UK-Government-Expenditure-2016-17.jpg
    1920px-UK-Government-Expenditure-2016-17.jpg
    147.3 KB · Views: 63
It's gonna become bankrupt anyway because of the inbred Pakis producing Charles II of Spain tier children.
The NHS is going bankrupt because of the whole Pensioners and Fat people keep draining money away from the NHS. The whole diabetes and obesity problem in the UK is pretty nutty.
 
Army Strong is the worst one yet. There was nothing at all wrong with Be All That You Can Be. But I guess it's a little too elitist. It implies that you actually have to try hard to be a good soldier. That's ableist. Today's youth doesn't want to try hard at anything. They just want to be handed their participation trophy so they can gloat on social media about how successful they are.

Army Strong sounds like a slogan for a product like tools or a heavy duty industrial cleaner.

When will the push for "muh inclusive language" end? It's already so exceptional sounding. We've got pregnant people and chest feeding. Now housewives are shoppers and forefathers are the antiquated and primitive sounding ancestors. Ancestors only really works if you are related to the dead people you are referring to.

It's starting to all sound very robotic. Like a machine that doesn't understand humanity is picking generic words to describe people.

Not everything has to be inclusive all the damn time. Stop worrying so much about feelings. People who stay all wishy washy over words aren't fit for army life anyway. Shouldn't you be weeding those people out instead of encouraging them to join up by catering to their overly sensitive fee fees?
While I don't think I have the stomach to join them, I've always appreciated the Marines for sticking to their "The Few, The Proud" slogan. When you get down to it, that's a pretty damn brilliant recruitment tool.
 
Back