Jonathan Monsarrat v. Brian Zaiger (2017)

ducktales4gameboy said:
I'd love to dump a copy of the site onto an empty mediawiki, roll every article back to 2008 and just lock it there in read-only mode. It'd be a nice bit of internet history preservation and would also make a bunch of cows really really mad.
Click to expand...

Fuck yes this so much. All the furry drama, the live journal stuff, myspace emo's, habbo raids, it's such a great time capsule of old internet culture
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Fustrated, Randall Fragg, krimsonincode and 27 others
upload_2017-12-28_18-6-53.png

http://www.universalhub.com/images/2017/monsarrat-answer.pdf

He's counterclaiming fees. He'll be fine.
 
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Fuck you jewish cunt, Slutpuppies, Splendid and 27 others
Null said:
Because Zaiger hired Randazza at $525/hr when he could have and should have bought a book on civil law.
Click to expand...
Is representing yourself the strategy you will you use when you are inevitably sued (Its going to happen eventually)? Or are you gonna give @AnOminous Forum God status for representing you.

Edit: I am reminded that Mark "Razzle Dazzle" Randazza is representing that Daily Stormer fuck. I hope he charges just as much but he will probably charge even more considering hes up against SPLC lawyers.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Late
Reactions: Sargent PoopyFace, lolwut, Shokew and 2 others
DragoonSierra said:
Is representing yourself the strategy you will you use when you are inevitably sued (Its going to happen eventually)? Or are you gonna give @AnOminous Forum God status for representing you.
Click to expand...
I've been sued three times and the cases were so flimsy they were thrown out without an answer. There is no legal claim to bring against me because I do not break the law. I have nothing to lose in representing myself as I have no assets to give, so yes, I would, if I felt an answer was even needed.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Adamska, Portajohn, Randall Fragg and 19 others
DragoonSierra said:
Edit: I am reminded that Mark "Razzle Dazzle" Randazza is representing that Daily Stormer fuck. I hope he charges just as much but he will probably charge even more considering hes up against SPLC lawyers.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure that Marc Randazza was also associated with a certain porn god.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Dynamite Ninja, Super Collie, Say no 2 hugs and 5 others
Null said:
I've been sued three times and the cases were so flimsy they were thrown out without an answer. There is no legal claim to bring against me because I do not break the law. I have nothing to lose in representing myself as I have no assets to give, so yes, I would, if I felt an answer was even needed.
Click to expand...
Sued? Did you not pay your webhost in cryptoshekels using an onionmail and registering under the registrar with completely bogus info?
Poor opsec m8.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: TheIceCreamMan, Pikimon, Dynamite Ninja and 6 others
AnOminous said:
Just put up the archive. Someone will mirror it.



Randazza is God. You're literally hiring God when you hire Randazza.

You're going to win, but you're going to pay.
Click to expand...

This. When Ellora’s Cave sued Dear Author, DA hired Randazza to defend them and ended up mostly winning, but it cost 100,000 plus. I’d say Randazza is who you want to defend you if you want to win and you can actually pay the bill.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Super Collie, Traditional Tet, Sargent PoopyFace and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back