Designated Whiner Shitting Street - General non DSP-specific discussion and stupid questions goes here

I've seen your arguments in favor of the story being true and see them as coming from tunnel-vision. You have ignored several possibilities in favor of this one, which I believe you have already tied to your ego. I believe that on a subconscious level you know you are fooling yourself, which is why I called you out for my wager.

If you truly believe in this 100%, as you have said, then is it not silly to reject a bet on the subject? Would you not take a bet on something similarly strong in your set of beliefs - say that the sky is blue? I'm prying to see if you are truly convinced by the data or if you're convinced by your emotions/hopes/ego.

If the latter, then I want you to say so. If the former, then I want your money.

I won't wager with you simply because I don't find it interesting, my interest is in discussion and research.
I will however make a charitable contribution right now.
http://www.tunapanda.org/
It's a 5013c registered charity with a bitcoin address dating back to 2014.
https://blockchain.info/address/1CU5YgjquupDw6UeXEyA9VEBH34R7fZ19b

I'll send 0.15 BTC ($2000) from the address 1JazoGdyB4bitQx7fjnFvLcvEKXLkZvgHi

I'll do it in about 10 minutes time so you can know its legit and there is no cunning ruse cruise going on (or if you reply fast enough I'll send it to another registered charity with a BTC address of your choosing).

If you want to take it as a bet, then take it as a bet and you can owe me the 0.15 BTC back if (lol, when) I turn out provably correct.
 
I won't wager with you simply because I don't find it interesting, my interest is in discussion and research.
I will however make a charitable contribution right now.
http://www.tunapanda.org/
It's a 5013c registered charity with a bitcoin address dating back to 2014.
https://blockchain.info/address/1CU5YgjquupDw6UeXEyA9VEBH34R7fZ19b

I'll send 0.15 BTC ($2000) from the address 1JazoGdyB4bitQx7fjnFvLcvEKXLkZvgHi

I'll do it in about 10 minutes time so you can know its legit and there is no cunning ruse cruise going on (or if you reply fast enough I'll send it to another registered charity with a BTC address of your choosing).

If you want to take it as a bet, then take it as a bet and you can owe me the 0.15 BTC back if (lol, when) I turn out provably correct.

I'm not sure what this is or what your intent with it is. I'm a trader and make my money on wagers, not by sending it to charity. Anyway, I don't truly believe your reason for ignoring my wager - as if you were really interested in research you would be including more possibilities than those you have hereto mentioned - yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs.

So... I will accept your explanation at face-level and won't push you toward my bet.
 
I'm not sure what this is or what your intent with it is. I'm a trader and make my money on wagers, not by sending it to charity. Anyway, I don't truly believe your reason for ignoring my wager - as if you were really interested in research you would be including more possibilities than those you have hereto mentioned - yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs.

So... I will accept your explanation at face-level and won't push you toward my bet.

:thinking:
 
I'm not sure what this is or what your intent with it is. I'm a trader and make my money on wagers, not by sending it to charity. Anyway, I don't truly believe your reason for ignoring my wager - as if you were really interested in research you would be including more possibilities than those you have hereto mentioned - yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs.

So... I will accept your explanation at face-level and won't push you toward my bet.

Please fucking kill yourself and save this thread from being locked doing so.
 
I'm not sure what this is or what your intent with it is. I'm a trader and make my money on wagers, not by sending it to charity. Anyway, I don't truly believe your reason for ignoring my wager - as if you were really interested in research you would be including more possibilities than those you have hereto mentioned - yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs.

So... I will accept your explanation at face-level and won't push you toward my bet.

There you go, $2000 so kids in east africa can learn how to use computers:
https://blockchain.info/tx/2b196a0d49dddc3ce36c31a297b34fb7eacc6c6ea9d8f0313dfca56c01a58e4e
(it'll take like 20-30 minutes to confirm probably)

In terms of addressing more possibilities, I think there's enough there for now. Its pretty unpredictable how DSP will act on any given day or what tangent he'll launch his prestream with.

I'm interested in research and proven this already by doing plenty of it to try and find as much as I can. A lot of it has already been posted in the MW thread.
 
I'm not sure what this is or what your intent with it is. I'm a trader and make my money on wagers, not by sending it to charity. Anyway, I don't truly believe your reason for ignoring my wager - as if you were really interested in research you would be including more possibilities than those you have hereto mentioned - yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs.

So... I will accept your explanation at face-level and won't push you toward my bet.

Okay, so you're a sock account and a scammer. Not looking good for you buddy. My bet still stands pussy boy
 
I'm not sure what this is or what your intent with it is. I'm a trader and make my money on wagers, not by sending it to charity. Anyway, I don't truly believe your reason for ignoring my wager - as if you were really interested in research you would be including more possibilities than those you have hereto mentioned - yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs.

So... I will accept your explanation at face-level and won't push you toward my bet.
Well perfect trader you are, considering you just pussied out like a little bitch.
 
It's not just money but reputation, if she does it then she'll get a rep in the escort community for breaking NDA's, which would scare off potential clients.

It's gotten to the point where if she's revealed to be fake I wouldn't feel like a fool at all because 1) The troll was so masterful and so well done I won't be able to help but applaud it for how good it is and how they'll go down in history and 2) It's produced so much good lolcow content from DSP, BSV and KG that it makes up for a lack of DSP expose because so many good moments have come from this.

If its true and DSP pays up which means she can't deliver then again, I won't be disappointed because of the number 2 reason I stated earlier. So much good content has come from this that really a DSP expose would be a cherry on top of a great cake rather than a disappointment.
Im sure clients would love haivng their personal details spread across twitter in angry tweets after setting a payment date.

The main person to damage her own reputation with this situation would be MW. As ive stated before, this NDA sounds rather malleable for her to publicly state his sexual preferences, details about his anatomy and details about their " staycation ".
 
There you go, $2000 so kids in east africa can learn how to use computers:
https://blockchain.info/tx/2b196a0d49dddc3ce36c31a297b34fb7eacc6c6ea9d8f0313dfca56c01a58e4e
(it'll take like 20-30 minutes to confirm probably)

In terms of addressing more possibilities, I think there's enough there for now. Its pretty unpredictable how DSP will act on any given day or what tangent he'll launch his prestream with.

I'm interested in research and proven this already by doing plenty of it to try and find as much as I can. A lot of it has already been posted in the MW thread.

I don't understand what you hoped to prove here... I don't care about kids in East Africa learning computers, so there is no way I would count this as your side of a wager. Also, you said you didn't want to make the bet, so... again - what's the point of this? Distraction?
 
I don't understand what you hoped to prove here... I don't care about kids in East Africa learning computers, so there is no way I would count this as your side of a wager. Also, you said you didn't want to make the bet, so... again - what's the point of this? Distraction?

You literally just said this:
"yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs."

Offer read.
Offer accepted.
Money sent.
 
You literally just said this:
"yet I do take your offer to send money to charity as evidence that you are not afraid to put money onto your beliefs."

Offer read.
Offer accepted.
Money sent.

Right. You proved that at the moment of typing it - you didn't need to actually make a donation. The meaning was - and I hope I'm not being condescending - that I excluded money issues from your list of reasons to refuse my offer. This donation does not convince me that you are truly - subconsciously - convinced that MW's story is true.

If you already understood this prior to my above explanation, please tell me, as that would tell me a lot about your psychology.

If you didn't understand this, pre-explanation: My offer is still valid, especially after seeing how frivolous you are with money (that's my opinion, of course - as I understand that you and many others consider charitable donations the opposite of being frivolous).
 
I don't understand what you hoped to prove here... I don't care about kids in East Africa learning computers, so there is no way I would count this as your side of a wager. Also, you said you didn't want to make the bet, so... again - what's the point of this? Distraction?
You do realize that you trying to do this actually makes everybody who is desperate to prove this to be fake makes you look like scammers right?
Come on pussy boy, i offer a bid and you pussy out
 
Right. You proved that at the moment of typing it - you didn't need to actually make a donation. The meaning was - and I hope I'm not being condescending - that I excluded money issues from your list of reasons to refuse my offer. This donation does not convince me that you are truly - subconsciously - convinced that MW's story is true.

If you already understood this prior to my above explanation, please tell me, as that would tell me a lot about your psychology.

If you didn't understand this, pre-explanation: My offer is still valid, especially after seeing how frivolous you are with money (that's my opinion, of course - as I understand that you and many others consider charitable donations the opposite of being frivolous).

You tried to call me out and I answered. You don't need a degree in Psychology to see that.

You were trying to see if I was willing to place money behind my belief, and I did.
 
Back