- Joined
- Jul 10, 2016
Wow, the absolute madman really did it. This is going to be great.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's probably fighting an uphill battle. Proving he was fired for his political affiliation will be difficult.https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/california-employment-discrimination-31690.html
"In addition, California state law also prohibits discrimination based on: ... Political activities or affiliations"
bing bing bong bong
OK, so apparently none of you other faggots read this thing in its entirety, because I haven't laughed this hard at a fucking document since the UN's infamous CVAWG report.
Let's travel to page 27 and you'll get a grasp of what I mean:
![]()
I wonder how Larry Page and Sergey Brin feel about how this mighty empire that they built in the fire and fury of the 90's tech boom and bust is now being controlled by a bunch of decadent manlets and their domineering concubines who are more concerned with new and more inventive ways of achieving orgasm then they are about how the barbarians over at Microsoft, Amazon and Sina Weibo are plotting their ruin.
I would like to think the same way Octavian and Vespasian would have though about Severus and Caligula running Rome. But then I realize Page and Brin are probably humongous twats too.
OK, so apparently none of you other faggots read this thing in its entirety, because I haven't laughed this hard at a fucking document since the UN's infamous CVAWG report.
Let's travel to page 27 and you'll get a grasp of what I mean:
![]()
Or Page 7:
![]()
Or Page 11:
![]()
Page 14:
![]()
It just snowballs from here, like a Katamari through the Tumblr subforum.
I don't know if he has a case or not but I wonder if this lawsuit was just done to embarrass Google.
I don't know if he has a case or not but I wonder if this lawsuit was just done to embarrass Google. If you felt the company screwed you over, a nice way to get back is to show the world that it's littered with disgusting weirdos who openly brag on company message boards about this stuff.
I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case at all. James seems to be the sort of person who would do something for the principle of doing things.
I doubt they care. Alphabet is a part of the federal government pretending to be a company.I wonder how Larry Page and Sergey Brin feel about how this mighty empire that they built in the fire and fury of the 90's tech boom and bust is now being controlled by a bunch of decadent manlets and their domineering concubines who are more concerned with new and more inventive ways of achieving orgasm then they are about how the barbarians over at Microsoft, Amazon and Sina Weibo are plotting their ruin.
I would like to think the same way Octavian and Vespasian would have though about Severus and Caligula running Rome. But then I realize Page and Brin are probably humongous twats too.
You can read the full lawsuit here.
https://www.scribd.com/document/368688363/James-Damore-vs-Google-Class-Action-Lawsuit
Google rise to success was being at the right time, at the right place in the internet boom with a fistful of telecoms grants. More luck and inertia than anything deliberate.I wonder how Larry Page and Sergey Brin feel about how this mighty empire that they built in the fire and fury of the 90's tech boom and bust is now being controlled by a bunch of decadent manlets and their domineering concubines who are more concerned with new and more inventive ways of achieving orgasm then they are about how the barbarians over at Microsoft, Amazon and Sina Weibo are plotting their ruin.
I would like to think the same way Octavian and Vespasian would have though about Severus and Caligula running Rome. But then I realize Page and Brin are probably humongous twats too.
You don't get California rep to the RNC as your personal lawyer for prices this guy can afford. They have their own agenda on this. Dhillon herself probably has a grudge against Google, though, and is apparently as soft a target as a corporation richer than God can be.
Is his kind of high-functioning autism considered a disability in California or federally?I agree. He's autistic. No, really. I'm surprised they didn't bring it up in the suit actually.
I imagine they'd defer to the DSM-5 which just considers it all "Autism Spectrum Disorder". The label has no real distinction between high/low/aspergers anymore, I don't see why the courts would interpret modern medical literature differently from the APA.Is his kind of high-functioning autism considered a disability in California or federally?