Artcow Shawn Durkin / gameguySX75 / RedStarMaster7 / nuttydudesart - Mario shipping & SSB sperg, draws like a child, wants his nipples removed, suicidal over GameTheory.

A Random said:
All I want to say is that Shawn reminds me of the 'i was just pretend' comic, except it ends with the loser just crying after getting called a tard.
Click to expand...

Ask and ye shall receive:

tardcry.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Stay safe, Polish Hot Dog (spicie), Derbydollar and 14 others
I love his essay about why Mario is not mental. Thankfully, he posted a link to it again today in a DA comment:
shawnyd.png

https://comments.deviantart.com/1/185421550/4528836430 (http://archive.is/cUOzf)

Mario Is NOT Mental! And Here Is Why!

Fully Debunked by GameGuySX75

Here in this document, i will rant against matpat enough to take down his whole theory once and for all!

Starting with the Donkey Kong evidence, Donkey kong circus is NOT AN OFFICIAL GAME!!! Nor is it even original! the game was designed after Mickey Mouse Circus! Donkey Kong circus is fake! It was not made by the officials! Even if it was, the game never states that Mario runs the circus! Even if he was, it would only prove that he is an animal abuser early on in his career, and could’ve easily changed his ways between then and now. As the instructions said, Mario was taking DK to the zoo so he can’t hurt or kidnap anyone anymore, Mario is the good guy in this! This is a game where you get to play as the villain. DKJR was trying to kill him, so Mario needed to act in self defense. Which he did, and if you defeat him and save DK, Mario falls and dies, how do i know this? There was a halo over his head when he fell. As for the Yoshi evidence, Mario is pointing to where he wants yoshi to point his tongue. Yoshi was not flinching, he has a long tongue, so like most reptiles or amphibians, he would need to go inside his stomach and grab his tongue, which explains why it looks like he’s flinching when he’s not. The player is the one who drops yoshi off the edge! Besides, their faiths are pretty much sealed at this point, there’s already no hope for the yoshi, so Mario might as well save himself so that they both don’t die, so one of them can still finish the level. As for the Luigi evidence, where does Luigi ever ask to come on an adventure with Mario? Mario wants Luigi on standby so he can save another kingdom, this actually did happen in paper Mario the 1000 year door. And if he did let Luigi on the adventure with him, it could be very dangerous and if Luigi got hurt, Mario would never be able to forgive himself. in Mario is missing, matpat is only assuming that Mario is saying this, when he could be thinking of anything! Nintendo put no effort in this game, so it would make sense why the ending looks like the way it does. Play the Mario and Luigi series, it will disprove a huge majority of the Mario is mental theory. In bowser’s inside story, Mario even gave Luigi the credit of defeating the shroobs from partners in time. Matpat didn’t play the full ending to Luigi’s Mansion. Luigi was laughing at Mario because of the way he came out of the machine, and in dark moon, Mario was thanking Luigi for saving him in a very loving matter. The shoe thing was an accident! Mario was congratulating Luigi, and he didn’t slap him on the back. He patted him on the back. I was just a hard pat. The force of his arm was strong enough to carry his foot with him, Mario was wiggling his shoe on Luigi’s and the diagonal (toes) was lifted upward, if he was drilling into it, it would’ve made slower movement and the diagonal (toes) would be pushing downward. As for cheep cheeps, they swim in large numbers and they hurt Mario on contact, so Mario needs to get rid of them. Getting burned and dying instantly is better than being stabbed in the mouth by a hook and dragged up the surface suffocating! As for the wiggler evidence, Mario had no knowledge that a wiggler was living in the place he flooded in 64. He was in a kill or be killed situation. And the wiggler in sunshine was preventing the legendary sand bird from hatching, so Mario needed to get rid of it. Not only that, but he was asked to do it, when the wiggler woke up, he was rampaging and could’ve been killing people, so Mario had to kill it to save all of those people. As for the womanizer evidence, Mario and Pauline are just friends. however, everything matpat pointed out only proves that Pauline could still have feelings for Mario, but Mario doesn’t feel the same way anymore. That black censor that said actual clip from the game in white, if it was an actual clip from the game, then why the is it censored? THEY WERE NOT HAVING SEX YOU FUCKING MORON!!! >:( this is super Mario we’re talking about, not grand theft auto or God knows what other inappropriate ! Nintendo would NOT put that kind of content in a franchise like Mario Bros. then he tries convincing us by saying that after saving Peach, the scene would contain a lapdance, why the fuck would it contain a lapdance?! as i said, this is super Mario we’re talking about, not grand theft auto! and this is also inappropriate content that Nintendo would NOT put in this kind of game. Matpat failed to analyze the punctuation when Mario saved Daisy. Not only was Mario out of breath, (which is probably why Mario said her name twice) even if, that IS how a friend greets another friend. Take the game over in Solid Snake for example, or the beginning of the ending of Mordecai and the Rigbys, Margret shouts “Mordecai! Mordecai!” and then Mordecai shouts “Margret Margret” keep in mind, Mordecai did it AFTER Margret did it! And they were still just friends at the time. Need proof? Fine! She introduces Mordecai to her new boyfriend, and it’s not Mordecai! Anyway, back to Mario. Daisy kissed HIM! Not the other way around! not even! It was a hug! Do you see her lips touch Mario’s face? NO! And like with Pauline, this only would prove that Daisy could have had feelings for him, but he didn’t feel the same way, and instead of anymore like with Pauline, he never felt that way about Daisy. So that’s why she went to Luigi. As for the Toad massacre evidence, has it ever come to mind that maybe Mario MIGHT NOT BE AWARE OF THE CURSE?!?! >:( GOD! matpat is saying that Mario knows full well about the curse, but he has NO PROOF SAYING SO! In fact, if you ever seen the japanese Mario movie, the quest to save princess Peach, that was made and released in Japan to celebrate the release of super Mario bros 2 in 1986, you would know about a man named the mushroom hermit, who tells Mario about the curse so he could save the the toads and lift the curse himself, but the mushroom hermit doesn’t really exist, he was only supposed to exist in the movie, the mushroom hermit was Mario’s only way of knowing about the curse, but he doesn’t truly exist, so Mario COULDN’T have known about the curse! Not only that, but the game say’s they were turned into bricks, not brick blocks, so Mario is actually doing them a favor by separating them so they won’t be all stuck together when the curse is undone. Besides, who ever even said you HAD TO BREAK THEM! like with yoshi, and the penguin thing in Super Mario 64 (which was one of my favorite Mario game of all time. =) ) it is completely optional! Also, the curse only applies to the original Mario bros game! Yes, Mario does kill many goombas and koopas and what not, but that’s because they’re part of bowser’s army and they would kill him if they touched him! Then matpat tries to compare this to an old south-eastern asian form of torture, which is ridiculous!! Because these are very fast and painless deaths, even enemies that take more than 1 hit are rather annoyed or angry because they are getting defeated, and who knows, they probably don’t even die at all, maybe they respawn back to Bowser’s castle, why do you think their popularity never decreases? Bowser is not magic, so he can’t just whip up new ones out of nowhere. If you want to replay the level, every enemy is back and fully unharmed, they are being respawned! for instance, no one permanently dies. and the enemies Mario defeats are not the same species as him, so it’s nothing to suffer PTSD from. it’s kinda like hunting. Mario does not celebrate any kind of massacre he’s celebrating the fact that he completed the level! If you were to play as blue toad, yellow toad or even Luigi, the all do the same thing Mario does, when he goes through a level of any kind. Then matpat tries comparing him to ACTUAL PSYCHOPATHS!!! >:( Who kill people because they feel like it, when Mario is practically forced to do it, in order to save Peach! And last but definitely not least, matpat tries to say this theory is fact, even though he says it’s just a theory, this is the one time he says it fact! he say’s and i quote the he definitively say that Mario has ASPD, which goes against what game theory is about, and that pisses me off the most! then he tries saying that Mario is no hero all together! just because he did all of that, it doesn’t permanently erase any of the good things he’s done, like in the super Mario galaxy series where he saves the universe, twice! or the whole paper Mario series, or especially the whole Mario and Luigi series!
now i don’t mean to brag here, (like themetalblade5) i’ve proven very well, that Mario does NOT have ASPD, and is no way mental! and lastly, all of matpat’s evidence is just a bunch of presumptions and over exaggerations that have way too many flaws to be proven true or considered as fact. he’s the one hiding things from us! in conclusion,



SUCK IT MATPAT!!!!! >=)


and now for some grand finale words from the heart. Mario has done some bad things, but does that really make him a bad person? we all done bad things in our lives, are you proud of it all? are you 100% satisfied about everything you’ve done throughout your life? no. Mario is under a lot of pressure, stress and pain. we all have our moments where we’ve just had enough, and we turn sour against the world, Mario is the perfect example of this. sure he’s done some bad things, but that doesn’t make him a bad person. it’s not fair to judge someone for the bad things they’ve done. Mario has done much more good than bad. Mario needs more love and more respect. it’s time to put an end to the Mario is mental theory, because of all the hatred and evil it has caused the entire internet to turn into. he may only be a video game character, but he gave us childhoods to remember forever, and this is how he’s thanked? Matpat is the true villain. look into your hearts, and think to yourself. is this really how you would see a modern day legend after he has gave us true joy happiness? if so, you’re the real monster. this propaganda needs to stop once and for all. it’s been around for 3 ½ years. and that’s long enough. it’s gone too far. heave my words, for they are all from the heart and truth...


and more thing to close this whole case all together, do you really think Nintendo would put something like a sociopath in a franchise like Mario Bros? content like that is too violent for this franchise. this is a rated E franchise. a psycho path of anything type would only be suitable for rated M games, or at least rated T games, nothing under.

if you gotten this far into the document i’m glad you took the time to read this document proving that Nintendo’s most iconic character in gaming (Mario) truly is the greatest hero in all of Nintendo.


Thank you~


- GameguySX75
Click to expand...
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EmO0uMtwJivOy1zAHa9uO27FIi7RpopsL9LXUsmqB08
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Hui, SugarSnot, Cato and 8 others
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Stay safe, Nekromantik, Corsola and 10 others
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Stay safe, Fuck you jewish cunt, wubalubadubdub and 4 others
Shawn has proceeded to regular uploading and commenting on DeviantArt, doing his normal shipping talk. He has however gotten better at replying to people who disagree with with him (or this was probably a ween, who's to say).
upload_2018-1-14_13-24-2.png

https://comments.deviantart.com/1/185421550/4528766178 (http://archive.is/14RIA)

On a side note, after I posted the reuploaded video in the OP that he deleted, he commented on it lol.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Echs Why Zed, Nekromantik, AnonAutismo and 3 others
WeeGee said:
Shawn has proceeded to regular uploading and commenting on DeviantArt, doing his normal shipping talk. He has however gotten better at replying to people who disagree with with him (or this was probably a ween, who's to say).
View attachment 356685
https://comments.deviantart.com/1/185421550/4528766178 (http://archive.is/14RIA)

On a side note, after I posted the reuploaded video in the OP that he deleted, he commented on it lol.
Click to expand...
Well holy shit. I think this is the first lolcow to actually get better!
We now officially have an answer to the question: "Is [cow] getting better?"
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Slick Bridges, Echs Why Zed, Acceptable and 3 others
I'm gonna preface by stating I had no intention of contact with the subject of the thread, but in the conversion on my upload which he started, he has ended with suicide baiting in a piss poor attempt to get the thread removed.
upload_2018-1-22_13-23-1.png


As far as his sperging activity, he was pissed by the ending of Mario Odyssey and now takes it to drawings of Mario with Pauline it seems.
upload_2018-1-22_13-31-44.png

https://max-black25.deviantart.com/art/Improved-ending-Collab-721529444 (http://archive.is/964dO#30%)
upload_2018-1-22_13-27-30.png

https://max-black25.deviantart.com/art/Tough-luck-725565489 (http://archive.is/tM9Dm#40%)
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Corsola, Shiny Shroodle, Sargent PoopyFace and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back