This is about a preticular post made with the statement "using us for his mr metokur jr to build his brand".
1. My name is not associated with any brand or tied to any forms of entertainment. A handle known as "TheArmedToast" "UnarmedToast" "cuckenjohnson" and "The exceptional detective" are associated with channels of differing content. Only two channels, Cuckenjohnson on Smashcast.tv and Thearmedtoast on twitch.tv are associated legal brands with 1099 independent employee forms attatched.
No other channels are associated with any brands. This means, my name my personal life and my information are not tied to any "brands". Only my avatars are. I have never used my personal information to represent anything of the sort so thats either dishonesty or flat out wrong on your end Josh.
2. "Mr Metokur Jr using us"
Nothing on my youtube channel, which is not monetized or selling anything brand related, is associated with MisterMetokur or his content or even like it. No video is stolen information or information gained directly from kiwifarms. In 1 video, "Narcissa vs His Hobby" I used a members quote to give context to what was happening within the ZSR community. You have zero thread related to cannibal communities and 1 thread on a incel that all posts were taken from the website sources in question on the videos.
Josh, intentionally tying me to a "brand" and intentionally dragging shit out more to intimidate and give others reasons to continue to target me and my real life (changing my username to my personal name and directing others with misinformation) shows someone looking for problems whether legal or not.
Your site is not the only source of anything and deciding to use my name and force it onto a brand that does not exist therefore, Defamation and possible emotional distress.
"
What Constitutes Defamation Online?
Defamation is generally defined as a false, published statement that is injurious to the plaintiff's reputation. An online posting, even on an obscure website, will likely be seen by a few people, thus satisfying the publication requirement.
Statements of Fact
A plaintiff cannot succeed in his or her online defamation claim if the defendant's defamatory statement was true. For example, if a customer posts a review of your business on Yelp, claiming that there was a rat infestation, you may sue them for defamation. You would then have to prove that there was no rat infestation, and thus, the defendant's statement was false. "
With that said, Change my username back to "fedoramanmanman" and do not attempt to tie my real name to any "brand" you think exists. This is me hoping to resolve anymore issues now.
Also, this is a private conversation between me and you. Two parties. You do not have permission to share this with anyone else but me and you. I hope we understand each other Josh, I have zero problems with you personally or the site as you know where I stand on my thoughts of the site just do not defame me. Thank you
