DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
BallBuster said:
Lending further proof to my original theory that this relationship is a business proposition rather than a real relationship complete with underwear time and the touchy feely of the naughty bits.

Again there is no concrete proof but there is enough speculative proof to go on.
Click to expand...
There's no way in hell, that Kat will let Phil go on top on her.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fascist Frederick, Jaspergers Cat, BatChatillon and 2 others
Is there a clip of it yet? I'm sure people are going to find something in his rant to report
 
GUYS, I JUST HAD A UUHHH MOMENT.

He knows that he always says things on prestreams that could bite him in the ass later... THE REAL REASON FOR THE SUPERLONG PRESTREAMS IS THAT THESE MOMENTS WILL BE HARDER TO FIND IF YOU WANNA CLIP IT A LATER DATE! PEOPLE MIGHT GIVE UP THE SEARCH BEFORE FINDING THAT 20 SECONDS IN A 90 MINUTES LONG VIDEO!
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Mr._Blonde, BatChatillon, Aurelian and 3 others
BeanieGuy said:
Holy shit are they actually THINKING by themselves? What happened? Should I be concerned?
Click to expand...
It's because Phil is finally being (mostly) left alone to troll himself, he always gets like this when he doesn't have detractors that are more toxic than he is.
 
lol drgnkiller posted the video of the tweets and twitter peeps are getting mad about it:
upload_2018-3-9_0-0-15.png
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Done, Sparkletor, Jotaro and 2 others
That was more work than I thought someone was going to do; I just thought it would be a video of NP clicking on the name and it going to Phil's Twitter.

. . . also what a silly thing to lie about. Just don't acknowledge it; the only way denying it would have blown up in Phil's face is if someone decided to make a video of the actual conversation. . .opps. Now what is the argument going to be: "Look, this is a clever fake. You see how they manipulated the shaky cam to simulate as if this were a real video; this is all Photoshop distortions!"
 
I'm still amazed that the same group of people that wholeheartedly believed that Leanna actually owned the adsense connected to Phil's account because Fred Fuchs said so are now the people demanding time stamped high quality receipts for minor leaks.

(I know they may not literally be the same people, hush)
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Long time lurker, rizlajizzla, JackDavis and 4 others
You know, I'm going to have to start investing in popcorn stocks, because man, I am going through boxes. This stuff is better than TV.
 
neger psykolog said:

(I had to cut out a lot of stuff for obvious reasons. When the DM log skips while loading that seems to be normal behavior on Twitter. If you don't think its real enough suck a dick and go bother admins to volunteer to verify this shit. The source said they didn't mind me using the other messages if they were worth it so a few are left in still)
Click to expand...

If you listen closely @ :30 there is a distinct door creak.
 
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fox, Sven, Long time lurker and 9 others
neger psykolog said:
lol drgnkiller posted the video of the tweets and twitter peeps are getting mad about it:
View attachment 398717
Click to expand...

So... I'm a DSP peep because I want proof that isn't blurred out with a meme covering it almost the entire video. Gotcha. Cause the escort proof worked out rrreeal well didn't it? I'm skeptical and that kinda shit doesn't help. I couldn't give two fucks what happens to good ol' Dave.

Tell me how this logic works: it's easier to just post a video of the profile clicking to the messages them in full but instead that mess was made. What does this person have to lose? DSP is already denying it and if it's true, then this anonymous source is now dead to him. So what the hell is the point at staying anonymous?
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: CabbageMan, kcbbq, Cyber Bowling and 18 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back