Maddox / George Ouzounian / George Schnoz - OG Internet blogger, Author of the NYT bestseller Alphabet of Manliness, Cohost of the Biggest Problem in the Universe, Filer of the Lolsuit. MADDOX BLAST!

Charlie Delicious said:
"Plaintiffs opposition brief is a ramshackle affair, twenty-five pages long (much of which is single-spaced) and containing a plethora of case citations but making only a handful of actual arguments. "

From the latest document filed by Patreon

Lol
Click to expand...

That "single-spaced" comment isn't a throwaway. Landau (yet again) violated the Rules.

"Rule 6. Form of Papers. All papers submitted to the Commercial Division shall comply with CPLR 2101 and section 202.5(a). Papers shall be double-spaced and contain print no smaller than twelve-point, or 8½ x 11 inch paper, bearing margins no smaller than one inch. The print size of footnotes shall be no smaller than ten-point. Papers also shall comply with Part 130 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator. Each electronically-submitted memorandum of law and, where appropriate, affidavit and affirmation shall include bookmarks providing a listing of the document’s contents and facilitating easy navigation by the reader within the document."
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista, Adamska, Lysol and 18 others
AnOminous said:
That "single-spaced" comment isn't a throwaway. Landau (yet again) violated the Rules.

"Rule 6. Form of Papers. All papers submitted to the Commercial Division shall comply with CPLR 2101 and section 202.5(a). Papers shall be double-spaced and contain print no smaller than twelve-point, or 8½ x 11 inch paper, bearing margins no smaller than one inch. The print size of footnotes shall be no smaller than ten-point. Papers also shall comply with Part 130 of the Rules of the Chief Administrator. Each electronically-submitted memorandum of law and, where appropriate, affidavit and affirmation shall include bookmarks providing a listing of the document’s contents and facilitating easy navigation by the reader within the document."
Click to expand...

So we can tell Patreon's lawyers do their homework, but how big of a deal this is to Landau? Is the court going to hold this against him and George or just tell them to fix it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GandT, Monster of the week and Super Collie
If you want to know who's submitting what on the lolsuit.com site, here's my mini guide for referencing the documents by the date/filing user column:

Landau – Documents from Maddox
Skibell and Olson – Documents from Patreon
Matz – Documents from Dick
Greenberger – Documents from Asterios
Munoz and Kaufman – Documents from Weber Shandwick

There's prolly an easier way to do this.

So now that Maddox has admitted to pretending to be a female Conde Nast journalist, let's reflect on the emails he was sending to Asterios' employer.

mcXYuqw.png

QOsEVEe.png

pAFZjST.png
QIu9Qdr.png



1v0qoyv.png

iKbwG1U.png

fNz7dV3.png

Egyw3zb.png


X6UFPua.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Late
Reactions: Ineedahero, Leo Bonhart, ConSluttant and 13 others
Charlie Delicious said:
So now that Maddox has admitted to pretending to be a female Conde Nast journalist, let's reflect on the emails he was sending to Asterios' employer.
Click to expand...

Imagine finding a lawyer passed out in a gutter so incompetent that he not only fails to state a claim against the person you're suing, but instead admits that you committed identity theft, fraud, harassment, libel, tortious interference with contract, and whatever else you could be sued for for this stunt, not only by the person you're suing but by an international media conglomerate like Conde Nast, too.
 
  • Winner
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Adamska, Lysol, FierceBrosnan and 14 others
Charlie Delicious said:
So now that Maddox has admitted to pretending to be a female Conde Nast journalist, let's reflect on the emails he was sending to Asterios' employer.

mcXYuqw.png

QOsEVEe.png

pAFZjST.png
QIu9Qdr.png



1v0qoyv.png

iKbwG1U.png

fNz7dV3.png

Egyw3zb.png


X6UFPua.png
Click to expand...

AnOminous said:
Imagine finding a lawyer passed out in a gutter so incompetent that he not only fails to state a claim against the person you're suing, but instead admits that you committed identity theft, fraud, harassment, libel, tortious interference with contract, and whatever else you could be sued for for this stunt, not only by the person you're suing but by an international media conglomerate like Conde Nast, too.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was reading those emails and thinking instead of showing any real evidence of Asterios harassing and CYBERBULLYING! Maddox, they kinda do the opposite and show Maddox harassing Asterios. Why would you admit to this? Doesn't this leave him open for some kind of legal retaliation?

This whole thing just gets more and more baffling as time passes
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, BhertMern, AnOminous and 12 others
AnOminous said:
Imagine finding a lawyer passed out in a gutter so incompetent that he not only fails to state a claim against the person you're suing, but instead admits that you committed identity theft, fraud, harassment, libel, tortious interference with contract, and whatever else you could be sued for for this stunt, not only by the person you're suing but by an international media conglomerate like Conde Nast, too.
Click to expand...
I wonder how many people with access to big money lawyers he's going to piss off by the end of this.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: GandT, AprilRains, Super Collie and 2 others
AnOminous said:
Imagine finding a lawyer passed out in a gutter so incompetent that he not only fails to state a claim against the person you're suing, but instead admits that you committed identity theft, fraud, harassment, libel, tortious interference with contract, and whatever else you could be sued for for this stunt, not only by the person you're suing but by an international media conglomerate like Conde Nast, too.
Click to expand...

And many, many counts of perjury for both the lawyer and his client
 
polonium said:
This whole thing just gets more and more baffling as time passes
Click to expand...
On one hand, the guy who allegedly focus-tested his revenge video couldn't apply that same rigor towards his choice of attorney.

On the other hand, L.A. being what it is, it must've been a breath of fresh air to hear someone say "yes" to something.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: polonium
polonium said:
Yeah, I was reading those emails and thinking instead of showing any real evidence of Asterios harassing and CYBERBULLYING! Maddox, they kinda do the opposite and show Maddox harassing Asterios. Why would you admit to this? Doesn't this leave him open for some kind of legal retaliation?

This whole thing just gets more and more baffling as time passes
Click to expand...
And it's not the first time him and his girlfriend (also a plaintiff in the lolsuit) have been caught contacting someone's workplace trying to get them fired. Maddox's girlfriend has a restraining order against her for contacting Dick's girlfriends employer.

And you better believe this will be brought up if it goes to trial

Edit
Good Lord
FB_IMG_1520665633167.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Ineedahero, Intelligent Calcium, Leo Bonhart and 19 others
AnOminous said:
Imagine finding a lawyer passed out in a gutter so incompetent that he not only fails to state a claim against the person you're suing, but instead admits that you committed identity theft, fraud, harassment, libel, tortious interference with contract, and whatever else you could be sued for for this stunt, not only by the person you're suing but by an international media conglomerate like Conde Nast, too.
Click to expand...
Could Landau be trying to worm out of sanctions over it by being able to say he made Maddox disclose it to the court?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: GandT, snackbar hero, AprilRains and 3 others
AnOminous said:
Imagine finding a lawyer passed out in a gutter so incompetent that he not only fails to state a claim against the person you're suing, but instead admits that you committed identity theft, fraud, harassment, libel, tortious interference with contract, and whatever else you could be sued for for this stunt, not only by the person you're suing but by an international media conglomerate like Conde Nast, too.
Click to expand...

This is actionable malpractice; unforunately, Maddox is too much of a fucking idiot to act on it.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Gordon Cole, ConSluttant, Monster of the week and 2 others
Charlie Delicious said:
And it's not the first time him and his girlfriend (also a plaintiff in the lolsuit) have been caught contacting someone's workplace trying to get them fired. Maddox's girlfriend has a restraining order against her for contacting Dick's girlfriends employer.

And you better believe this will be brought up if it goes to trial

Edit
Good Lord
View attachment 399688
Click to expand...

Not thin enough, that guy is so poor he is starving.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back