So. . .no thoughts on JF saying, "There are evolutionary justifications for pedophilia. If you are the state of nature and you don't live in a policed society. . .you're some guy in the forest or an isolated enough group of individuals such that the parents of the kids will not be monitoring you. . .there are kids in our evolutionary history who found themselves orphaned, so there is an evolutionary justification to say, 'Hey I am going to take this kid in my house, and eventually they become reproductive[generally age 8

to 13] and at that time I will have babies.' So pedophilia IS probably a default mode of reproduction for a large part of our evolutionary history."
Any thoughts on this statement from JF, "Evolution doesn't prevent you from masturbating(he's referring to any sex that won't result in babies as masturbation) over a child. Why not take the child in your home, and habituate them to sex[and ASAP they will be pregnant]?"
Just a little butthurt dickriding because I disparaged pure biology degrees? Ok