Megathread Insane Parents of "Transgender" Kids - Parents who push a transgender identity on their children

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It's shit like this that makes really wonder if letting someone with gender dysphoria transition is a good idea? To me, the body is a wonderful piece of engineering but in some aspects fragile. So when I hear puberty blockers I "let's fuck up some important chemistry in the body!" The "neo-vagina" is a (no pun intended) can of worms that I honestly just cannot support. Especially doing this shit to kids is where I definitely draw the line.

It should only be a problem if it's a kid. They can't even consent properly. Most of them probably have no idea wtf is going on and end up doing whatever their parents want them to do.
Adults usually know what they're getting into and are aware of potential side-effects.
 
Interesting/horrifying article from a crazy troon who used to work at google:
https://catamorphism.org/Writing/trans-kids.html
upload_2018-2-22_8-48-33.png

Maybe you've read about David Reimer, the Canadian boy who was circumcised at the age of a few months old because both he and his twin brother had foreskins that wouldn't retract easily. The doctor slipped and burned off his penis; since it was thought that a boy could never grow up without a penis and be psychologically healthy, the decision was made, on the advice of renowned "gender" "scientist" John Money, to remove what was left of his penis and raise him as a girl. (At least some semblance of rationality was present insofar as the decision was made not to circumcise Reimer's brother, whose foreskin problem promptly cleared up on its own.)This was a horrible mistake, as everyone was willing to admit later on except for Money....

...If they weren't convinced already, Reimer's case was enough to convince most rational people that similar experiments should never be conducted again -- should never be conducted again on cisgender children, that is. Yet another experiment continues today: the experiment of denying hormone replacement therapy to transsexual kids.

After fifty years of administering hormone replacement therapy to transsexual people, we know it's effective, we know almost everybody who opts for it reports increased well-being as a result, and we have no reason to believe it isn't safe.

So if who you think of as your little girl says "I want to have a penis," it's ineffective and dangerous to assume, "She's just a tomboy, and will grow up to be a happy, perhaps mannish woman, perhaps even a lesbian woman, but that would be okay because I'm a liberal who's supposed to tolerate that." Bodily identity rarely if ever changes over time, and it can't be cured or changed with therapy any more than sexual orientation can be -- perhaps even less easily than sexual orientation can be changed. If you're transsexual, and your feelings of bodily incongruence bother and upset you, it's unlikely that that feeling will go away by itself, and likely that a combination of hormones, surgery, and publicly expressing your desire to be acknowledged as a member of your preferred gender (not necessarily all of the above) will help. People don't grow out of this one; people who know when their age is in single digits especially don't grow out of this one. There is no evidence to the contrary.

I repeat: this is an experiment. Trans kids are the subjects, and they're hardly being asked for their informed consent. When I started taking testosterone, I had to sign a form that stated I understood a list of things that the hormone would, might, and would not to do my body, and that many of them were irreversible. No one asks an avowed twelve-year-old trans boy to sign such a form before he is allowed to go through "natural" puberty as a female-bodied person. Why isn't everybody outraged that we're doing medical and psychological research on underage children without their consent? Is it because ethics only apply to cisgender people? Or is it that transsexual people aren't people at all? Consensus has rejected surgeries to "normalize" intersex babies, as such surgeries wreck sexual functioning and are meant to appease parents who are uncomfortable with the idea of raising a child whose sex is unclear rather than to enhance intersex childrens' lives. It does not seem at all extremist to consider the possibility that denying HRT to trans kids is a measure meant to placate parents who are uncomfortable with the idea of raising a transsexual kid; parents' anxiety is being put ahead of children's well-being.
 
Last edited:
Screenshot_20180227-101738.png
found this while looking into a troon lolcow. There's also some drama about troons trying to suppress research on rapid onset gender dysphoria (kids who were never dysphoric training out as teens). The #ROGD tag on twitter is full of this crap if anyone is interested. Here's an article about it. Troons are accusing parents of being abusive and suppressing their child's inner troon or something.
 
It's shit like this that makes really wonder if letting someone with gender dysphoria transition is a good idea? To me, the body is a wonderful piece of engineering but in some aspects fragile. So when I hear puberty blockers I "let's fuck up some important chemistry in the body!" The "neo-vagina" is a (no pun intended) can of worms that I honestly just cannot support. Especially doing this shit to kids is where I definitely draw the line.
The problem is that not transitioning to them is likely to end as badly if not worse than transitioning. It's as I'd describe, a no win situation.
 
The problem is that not transitioning to them is likely to end as badly if not worse than transitioning. It's as I'd describe, a no win situation.
But how can you know whether or not a kid is experiencing something serious or if it's just a phase? Kids change their mind all the time. In most cases it's probably safer not to let them transition.
 
The problem is that not transitioning to them is likely to end as badly if not worse than transitioning. It's as I'd describe, a no win situation.
That's not at all what the data show. Here's a quote from the NHS gender page admitting that no one knows what the fuck they are doing or what the outcome will be.
Screenshot_20180304-195418.png
then there is this data for gender clinic referrals:
increase-in-girls.jpg

It's a trend.
 
That's not at all what the data show. Here's a quote from the NHS gender page admitting that no one knows what the fuck they are doing or what the outcome will be. View attachment 395925 then there is this data for gender clinic referrals:
View attachment 395927
It's a trend.
Of course, what does one expect when there's politicians who will pull research grant funding with the first mention of the word transgender.
 
I read this thread in one sitting and my main takeaway from it is how none of these parents screencapped/quoted seem to wonder "is this all a bad idea?" when confronted with physical evidence like that poster child for young transitioning, Jazz, literally having a pre-pubescent penis incapable of producing enough tissue to get rendered into a ~neovagina~. Like they built up this whole escapist fantasy of "journey to womanhood" with asspats and media interviews and feel good praise for Jazz and its totally thwarted by an angry inch.

Also, I agree with the common sentiment I see that a lot of these parents talk up ~the spectrum~ and ~non-binary~ while harboring a lot of homophobia and desire for Johnny to not be a faggot and just become a good little "accepted" Suzie. When your interests for your child align with iran's that should make you stop and question what you are doing.

16/18/whatever you define as a consciously acting adult should be the no-holds-barred time you can go hog wild and transition when its your prerogative and not what your parents want what they feel is right for you.
 
the tawani foundation will pick up the slack, unless you're researching detransition, then you won't get past the university.

The simplest explanation is usually the correct one. It's a trend. These kids are fucked, their parents are crazy.
Even then, you probably won't reach the university either with detransition studies without risking a grant pull given the FDA policies at this time. It's almost as if transgender is the 3rd rail as detransition risks pissing off Dems/social liberals, pro-transition studies will piss off Republicans/social conservatives.
 
had to share this cringe: "my daughter has an erection" (talking about a five year old WTF)
Cognitive dissonance, anyone?
Yes, life is interesting when your five-year-old daughter has a penis.
It’s Monday night. She huffs, annoyed. She’s in the bath playing with her rubber ducks. “I hate it when my penis sticks up like that.”
I look into the bath water. Yup, she’s got a little erection going on.
OK, Mom, be cool.
“Why don’t you like it?”
“It’s just so annoying! Like, it sticks out of my underpants sometimes. It’s not comfortable.”
“Hmm, yes, that does sound annoying. I think there are some special underpants for girls with penises. Shall we try to get you some of those?”
“Yes, please! Can I pick them out? I want black ones!” (She’s in a sort of kindergarten Goth phase – everything’s gotta be black.)
“You bet, kiddo. Black it is.”
She smiles and resumes playing with her collection of rubber duckies.
Whew! Normalcy maintained, once again, despite a reality in which I am pretty certain that I can actually FEEL my brain attempting to re-wire itself in order to process the world wrought by my fabulous trans daughter.
The trick? Believing it’s normal, and showing her that I believe it is. Or faking it really well when my mind is stuck in spin cycle as I watch my lithe little princess with her long, blond hair, sporting an erection in the bathtub.
The thing, this IS normal. It’s natural. Yes, it’s somewhat rare to be transgender (perhaps one in a thousand?), and it’s not widely understood or accepted, but it’s normal because it happens.
It’s happened to us.
 
The dialogue reads of woke 8 year old. Since that post was 4 years old, I wonder how screwed up the kid is now.
Very, the mom and kid were interviewed for a few publications and got mad that the resulting articles didn't take gendermom's side. You can feel the narc rage of not even being mentioned in one of the articles.

Today, I’m the mother of a nine-year-old transgender daughter who, over the past six years, has wavered in her female gender identity exactly as many times as the average cisgender girl does: Never. Not once. The suggestion that she might be mistaken, that she might be able to “switch back” to boyhood, strikes her as absurd and utterly distasteful, as well as unthinkable and impossible, like changing her blue eyes to brown. It also pisses her off: “Haven’t you been listening?!

That’s precisely the question I felt like asking these two writers. How could they have spoken at length to me and my daughter with a straight face, and then gone on to write articles that call into question both my judgment and her very existence? (McCann actually made no mention of us in her piece.)

She trots out the comparison of affirming trans kids with giving cancer patients medicine, but then says that it is wrong to want to find ways to reduce the number of kids transitioning. Either it's horrible and deadly or it's amazing and unique, fuckin pick one. Shit is gonna get real around puberty. I don't know if gendermom's is rich enough to afford lupron.

.
 
Back