Disaster Possible multi-national airstrike on Syria expected in the next 72 hours - "I don't want to set the worrrld on firrreeee~"

Europe's air traffic control network has warned commercial aircraft to avoid Syrian airspace due to a possible strike being planned in the next 72 hours.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/9...-uk-france-chemical-attack-russia-eurocontrol

DEFCON has been lowered to 4 over reports of military amassing air forces and the potential risks of a Russia vs. U.S. conflict.
https://defconwarningsystem.com/2018/04/10/defcon-warning-system-update-4-10-18/

Supposedly the British RAF is on alert in Cyprus.

There's also unconfirmed reports of the U.S. moving missile cruisers around in the Mediterranean and aircraft in Eastern Iraq.

 

[Near]

You survive the apocalypse, come to terms that your friends and loved ones are literally nuclear dust, you try not to die from cancer, you miraculously survive being harassed by some biker faggots with Mohawks and shitty leather jackets...only to be constantly pestered by a black cowboy.

"Another settlement has said word that they need our help. I'll mark it on your map."

I'm more so worried about being able to answer in only four ways.

Yes
Yes sarcastically
Yes for sure
And no (yes)

 

[Yop Yop]

I can't wait until the US is reduced to rubble so the Mexican master race can finally claim world dominance once and for all.

 

[Nacho Man Randy Salsa]

it all keeps tumbling down, tumbling down, tumbling down...

 

[8777BB5]

Hate to tell everyone this, but something tells me nothing is going to happen

 

[Cosmos]

I’m so fucking tired of this. I’m so fucking tired of politicians who care more about fear-mongering and war-mongering and getting into pissing contests than they do about protecting and doing what’s best for their people. I’m so fucking tired of this Cold War 2.0 bullshit that should have ended back in the 90s. I’m so fucking tired of the threat of nuclear warfare, because even though it should be blindingly obvious what a catastrophic mistake it would be, I’m not sure I can trust the people in charge of running the world to have enough foresight and restraint to not do it. I don’t think this incident will lead to anything serious, but it’s setting a dangerous precedent.

I will say that Russia needs to step the fuck down. They are going out of their way to aggrevate the rest of the world and it needs to stop. I wish Putin would finally realize that Russia would be in much better shape if it got along with the West instead of vainly trying to go back to its Soviet Union glory days.

 

[Null]

Just everyone calm their tits. We fired missiles before and it didn't kill any Russians, so why would this be any different? Also, to comrade Putin, if you could avoid nuking LA until Monday, I'd be fine.

if the tsar bomba doesn't hit LA putin can go fuck himself

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Will there ever be peace in the Middle East? Ever?

 

[Trans Fat 41g]

Will there ever be peace in the Middle East? Ever?

Now now, there there...

No... goy...

 

[Schwachkopf]

my grandmother lives in syria and there's multi-national airstrikes coming

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

 

[Sissy Galvez]

Great, flying to Europe tomorrow.

 

[Hugh Neutron]

Great, flying to Europe tomorrow.

Go to Switzerland, you’ll survive there.

 

[AP 297]

Okay, here is a map of the likely locations of a Nuke Strike:

You can disagree and site the source as BusinessInsider, but the fact remains that Russia wants to destroy infrastructure and America's strike capability. It is less concerned with making casualties.

New York and LA are not likely targets at all. Washington DC is tho.

These are the locations you need to do your nuke searches around.

http://www.businessinsider.com/likely-us-nuclear-targets-2017-5

Just my 0.02, but I really doubt Russia will go nuclear to save Bashar Assad. At this point, the guy is more of a headache than an asset. Why Putin hasn't just had him replaced with a military dictator ages ago is beyond me.

Have fun with the freakouts, tho!

 

[TrippinKahlua]

This is Christianity Biblical Book of Revelation stuff you know.

Flight #777 on Titus airways now boarding.

 

[Slap47]

Remember when people said "vote Trump since Clinton will start WWIII"? Yeah, me too. Then again, even if we had President Sanders or President Paul (either Ron or Rand) or even President "What is Aleppo" Johnson, they'd still end up pressured into this. It's amazing there isn't bipartisan opposition to this in the US--spend the money we spend on this bullshit on welfare, on solving the deficit, on handing money to your corporate cronies, literally anything is better and makes more political sense than spending it on bombing shithole countries for the sake of international dickwaving.

Most Americans support this.

 

[Black Waltz]

Okay, here is a map of the likely locations of a Nuke Strike:

View attachment 424575

You can disagree and site the source as BusinessInsider, but the fact remains that Russia wants to destroy infrastructure and America's strike capability. It is less concerned with making casualties.

New York and LA are not likely targets at all. Washington DC is tho.

These are the locations you need to do your nuke searches around.

http://www.businessinsider.com/likely-us-nuclear-targets-2017-5

Just my 0.02, but I really doubt Russia will go nuclear to save Bashar Assad. At this point, the guy is more of a headache than an asset. Why Putin hasn't just had him replaced with a military dictator ages ago is beyond me.

Have fun with the freakouts, tho!

lol I'm safe :p

 

[Hugh Neutron]

Okay, here is a map of the likely locations of a Nuke Strike:

View attachment 424575

You can disagree and site the source as BusinessInsider, but the fact remains that Russia wants to destroy infrastructure and America's strike capability. It is less concerned with making casualties.

New York and LA are not likely targets at all. Washington DC is tho.

These are the locations you need to do your nuke searches around.

http://www.businessinsider.com/likely-us-nuclear-targets-2017-5

Just my 0.02, but I really doubt Russia will go nuclear to save Bashar Assad. At this point, the guy is more of a headache than an asset. Why Putin hasn't just had him replaced with a military dictator ages ago is beyond me.

Have fun with the freakouts, tho!

San Diego is a military hotspot, that’ll be hit. Also there are silos all up and down the midwest.

 

[Sissy Galvez]

Go to Switzerland, you’ll survive there.

True, that’s where all the jew gold is.

 

[GS 281]

Okay, here is a map of the likely locations of a Nuke Strike:

View attachment 424575

You can disagree and site the source as BusinessInsider, but the fact remains that Russia wants to destroy infrastructure and America's strike capability. It is less concerned with making casualties.

New York and LA are not likely targets at all. Washington DC is tho.

These are the locations you need to do your nuke searches around.

http://www.businessinsider.com/likely-us-nuclear-targets-2017-5

Just my 0.02, but I really doubt Russia will go nuclear to save Bashar Assad. At this point, the guy is more of a headache than an asset. Why Putin hasn't just had him replaced with a military dictator ages ago is beyond me.

Have fun with the freakouts, tho!

That's kinda retarded. Why not strike supply chain infrastructure and manufacturing? Why care about soldiers who have no tanks or planes? I would put Detroit at the top of the list. Lotta empty factories to convert to war factories.

 

[Count groudon]

I was gonna say I have too much to live for, but really life has pretty much reached it's peak and I ain't got nowhere to go but down.

Still I don't want my friends and family's lives to go out in a flash over a pissing contest.

 

[AbuIstimnaAlKekistani]

If you think this is going to end in a world ending nuclear showdown you are objectively r.etarded
People said the same shit about North korea

Maybe its brinkmanship, but brinkmanship has a habit of blowing up in your face.

North Korea is a third rate shit hole that has issues with feeding its people and which needed decades to develop nuclear weapons. Russia is a peer competitor and has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the United States many times over.

Want to know how a nuclear war plays out?
The US attacks Syria, Russia has said that they will defend Syria from such an attack. This includes targeting American platforms that launched the attack. The Russians sink an American warship. The Americans retaliate by sinking Russian warships near Syria and targeting Russian forces at Latakia's airport, largely destroying Russia's forces in Syria.

The Russians decide to retaliate somewhere else and a general war breaks out. The Russians eventually suffer a major loss. In an effort to stem the results of that loss they use nuclear weapons tactically, targeting American forces. The Americans retaliate against whats left of the Russian military, an air base or port facility. In the process they do major damage to a nearby urban center. The Russians see that as a strategic strike and start going after counter value targets.

If you think that this has no chance of happening, then you haven't been following things. To the Russians this isn't about Syria. This is about the Americans imposing their hegemony on an emerging multi-polar world. The Russians evidently see that if they back down here, the next domino will be Russia itself.