Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

Would you rape Jess Phillips


  • Total voters
    2,417
The you I'm reffering to is the Liberalists. I can still offer a better solution though. Give up and stop pretending this malformed joke of a movement is ever going to amount to anything.
You never know. Maybe they've got a would-be Jordan Peterson lurking in the shadows waiting to burst forth. Then again, it's always possible Peterson's and Sargon's movements may combine to create the Super movement of Liberalist Jungian Western Crusaders.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Lysol
Sargon and co. have officially begun drafting the "Liberalist" Party for the UK. The path to Fuhrership has officially begun.
So a party who do not espouse freedom of speech and expression unless the thoughts expressed agree exactly with The Party, a party who do not recognise people of certain ethnicities because The Party believes they are wrong, a party who wants to ban anyone they disagree with for whatever reason from the country because The Party sees them as undesirables.

Die Fahne hoch! Die Reihen fest geschlossen! ...
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lysol and soy_king
So a party who do not espouse freedom of speech and expression unless the thoughts expressed agree exactly with The Party, a party who do not recognise people of certain ethnicities because The Party believes they are wrong, a party who wants to ban anyone they disagree with for whatever reason from the country because The Party sees them as undesirables.

Die Fahne hoch! Die Reihen fest geschlossen! ...
Please indulge my inner autism, but when did this shit happen?
 
Please indulge my inner autism, but when did this shit happen?
I'm speaking in overly exaggerated terms, and what I've said reflects my interpretation of what the Sargonites stand for.
If I must speak seriously I shall. From what I understand their goals to be, I can't help but think it's going to be extreme in some context which context that is I find it extremely difficult to say. Given that every few months Sargon seems to change his stance upon most things which is amplified by his inability to give himself and his group a label and then get upset when other people co-opt the label because it perhaps suits them well enough and since they aren't on Sargon's team he wants no part and move on. It just all rubs me the wrong way, this self-indulging pseudo-intellectual bullshit which Sargon is seemingly fine to lead.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lysol and soy_king
I'm speaking in overly exaggerated terms, and what I've said reflects my interpretation of what the Sargonites stand for.
If I must speak seriously I shall. From what I understand their goals to be, I can't help but think it's going to be extreme in some context which context that is I find it extremely difficult to say. Given that every few months Sargon seems to change his stance upon most things which is amplified by his inability to give himself and his group a label and then get upset when other people co-opt the label because it perhaps suits them well enough and since they aren't on Sargon's team he wants no part and move on. It just all rubs me the wrong way, this self-indulging pseudo-intellectual bullshit which Sargon is seemingly fine to lead.
Not gonna lie, but I was kinda hoping this happened. I don't know how long I'd be laughing if Sargon was secretly more hardcore than Anglin.
 
Not gonna lie, but I was kinda hoping this happened.
Well, they've had their Beer Hall meeting where a new inductee to the fold who has some sort of worthwhile asset has been welcomed with open arms and yet people who for longer than Sargon knew the word liberalist existed thinks he's wrong and disagree with him on a large number of points. Which is to be expected given that every liberalist I've witnessed discussing their ideals it is "whatever you wish to make of it" which leads me to suspect Sargon's intention is to try and control that whatever YOU wish to be whatever HE wishes and given he has his following of devout believers it's almost Bolshevik in that regard.
Overall though, it just feels too parallel to what that little Austrian bloke did, granted I doubt Sargon would be so drastic (I bloody hope).
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Lysol
At first, it made sense; they were trying to be funny. And when that's what everyone thought that's what they were doing, it was. ... then he refused to shut the fuck up about it. And then you realize the next year spent constantly bringing up the fact "I was just sitting there... and then she SCREAMED at me!" was a deliberate attempt to get a reaction so he could make it look like a bigger "problem", and thus offering a reasonable "solution" to it.

For me, it was hilarious when Sargon ended up whining about how Hank Green was ignoring him on twitter.

I'm speaking in overly exaggerated terms, and what I've said reflects my interpretation of what the Sargonites stand for.
If I must speak seriously I shall. From what I understand their goals to be, I can't help but think it's going to be extreme in some context which context that is I find it extremely difficult to say. Given that every few months Sargon seems to change his stance upon most things which is amplified by his inability to give himself and his group a label and then get upset when other people co-opt the label because it perhaps suits them well enough and since they aren't on Sargon's team he wants no part and move on. It just all rubs me the wrong way, this self-indulging pseudo-intellectual bullshit which Sargon is seemingly fine to lead.

Sargon is now saying he opposes all immigration for example. Purely so the AltRight cant attack him, except by implying it's a phoney position I guess.

Really what irritates me about this is not how non-descript and malleably vague the new Liberalist principles are, or how Sargon appeals to 'first principles' whenever he needs to justify what he is doing/saying right now but the fact that Sargon's whole argument (depending on who he is talking to) boils down to "well, as a Liberal I can justify whatever solution benefits me right now so therefore there's no problem with Liberalism"

Which I think is much the same as what you criticize. Ultimately this movement is just what Sargon likes with no consistent throughline
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Balls McGuffin
You're being way too generous to Louis Le Vau. He a spasticated sperg who can't argue a position for shit. Just listen to him talking to Mister Metokur and you'll see what I mean. A better person than Sargon in the Liiberalist movement would have to be Vee. He debates and realizes that Sargon's fuck-ups negatively impact the group's potential as a legitimate political party.
Ol' Louie would be more effective if he kept in the background, tbh, but he's got too big a mouth for that. Honestly, I don't think it's so much that he can't argue as that he has such a self-righteous attitude about literally everything that he thinks he only has to lay out his point, rather than expend any effort defending it, then bolster said point with loads of childish ad hominem attacks that might rally the troops but don't explain why such and such person is wrong on a given issue. But yeah, statements like "I don't think I do" and "You're being obtuse" aren't arguments, but opinions.
 
When Vee - the man eternally searching for a point - is your best guy, your movement might be in trouble.

You'll notice zero support from the usual crowd of internet pundits for Soygoy's larping group.

I honestly think the crowd Sargon surrounds himself is his biggest detriment (besides his massive fucking ego.) Let's be real here, the only cronies of his that are tolerable are Arch and Dankula.

Vee is a furfag spaz that seems to get off on making himself look retarded and misrepresenting his own positions. Quartering is a dramawhore and serial whiner. Louis, imo, is more of a lapdog to the Don than Vee is - he parrots literally everything Sargon says but is infinitely less articulate when saying it. Randomercam is... well, Randomercam. Everybody else is a literallywho.
 
Ol' Louie would be more effective if he kept in the background, tbh, but he's got too big a mouth for that. Honestly, I don't think it's so much that he can't argue as that he has such a self-righteous attitude about literally everything that he thinks he only has to lay out his point, rather than expend any effort defending it, then bolster said point with loads of childish ad hominem attacks that might rally the troops but don't explain why such and such person is wrong on a given issue. But yeah, statements like "I don't think I do" and "You're being obtuse" aren't arguments, but opinions.

You talking about Louie or sargon?
 
Back