Bikini Armor Battle Damage - Hypocrites and Sexy Art

Sexual jealousy. These pathetic nerd girls need to make fictional women look ugly because they themselves are or feel ugly and insecure, and since many men (and women) enjoy large breasts and see them as a symbol of beauty/sexuality, they HAVE to go for the "sake" of the ugly girls/enbies' ego.

Basically, since they can't go towards a RL sexy woman and call her skank/whore/slut (otherwise they'd be ignored at best or be yelled at/slapped/etc. at worst), they make whiny blogs where they yell about fictional sexy women for "reminding" them of how ugly they are or feel. It's pathetic and cowardly AF.


I always wondered what happened to Black Widow from Iron 2 to Avengers, but then I thought who they were trying to get to watch the movie.
im57699304.jpg



Total_Film_Infinity_War_Black_Widow.jpg
 
Didn't BABD throw a shitfit when someone pointed out that armour bingo almost never worked and they retorted it wasn't supposed to? I have a vague recollection of this happening.

Edit: if i recall the MGSV and Dragon's Crown tags are mountains of salt and false-equivelance, i don't have time right now but i might post some caps tomorrow if no one beats me to it.
 
Last edited:

Welcome to 1989. Bitches today be 'tarded as fuck.

That stuff was all over the place back in the day. Usually a full size poster would come with the game. The woman in this photo was the wife of one of the programmers for the game, if you can believe it.
eYpUSg.jpg


uploads1506452975093-VideoGameAds00.jpg


What surprised me is that Game of War had this ad on during the superbowl. Maybe it's just because its the last thing on TV they can rely on for a large male demographic to watch.
maxresdefault (4).jpg
 
I thought Anita coined the term?

Ah, that was my mistake. But it's still hilarious that TMS seemingly didn't recognize a Sarkeesian-ism when someone used it in an article designed to troll them.

The mere existence of the "term" and its 'creation' by someone who calls herself a ~proud feminist~ shows how pathetic the state of "online feminism" is, however. How misogynistic, indeed.
 
Doesn't matter if there's both scantly clad women and men. Muscle dudes are icky to them.

That's cause Muscular guys are power fantasy so it "doesn't count". They would rather get stabed in the eye than ever admit muscle dudes are just sexualized as women are.

It's basically this funny edit of bad comic:

ShortpackedJojo.png
 
That's cause Muscular guys are power fantasy so it "doesn't count". They would rather get stabed in the eye than ever admit muscle dudes are just sexualized as women are.

It's basically this funny edit of bad comic:

ShortpackedJojo.png

Somebody on /tv/ posted several comparison pictures, I was only able to grab one. This isn't the best of them, but it was comparing male and female big screen actors. Much of the time the girls don't show enough skin or have a wide shot to do a comparison photo so they grab papparazzi shots.

Since women are the best demographic to target (they are willing to try new things, are more likely to switch brands due to advertising, are potent social media influencers) that more and more movies are being retooled to their aesthetic. The men are the typical "power fantasy" types you see on the front of romance novels. And the women become more plain looking, more androgynous. To help the viewer identify with her. Think Bella, think Rey, think the new Lara Croft movie.

The theory going around is that women character that are too sexy to men(not the Jennifer Aniston sexy), are often distasteful as a character to women as they are percieved as competition. Whereas an attractive muscular male character is eye candy for the women, but something to aspire to for men.

I mean Hollywood is allowed to have a lead actor in a major film that is ripped to shreds like Hugh Jackman. But the male equivalent to that, someone akin to Christina Hendricks, would never get a lead role like that. And at the same time given the same care to characterization.
1524403764243.png
 
Last edited:
Somebody on /tv/ posted several comparison pictures, I was only able to grab one. This isn't the best of them, but it was comparing male and female big screen actors. Much of the time the girls don't show enough skin or have a wide shot to do a comparison photo so they grab papparazzi shots.

Since women are the best demographic to target (they are willing to try new things, are more likely to switch brands due to advertising, are potent social media influencers) that more and more movies are being retooled to their aesthetic. The men are the typical "power fantasy" types you see on the front of romance novels. And the women become more plain looking, more androgynous. To help the viewer identify with her. Think Bella, think Rey, think the new Lara Croft movie.

The theory going around is that women character that are too sexy to men(not the Jennifer Aniston sexy), are often distasteful as a character to women as they are percieved as competition. Whereas an attractive muscular male character is eye candy for the women, but something to aspire to for men.

I mean Hollywood is allowed to have a lead actor in a major film that is ripped to shreds like Hugh Jackman. But the male equivalent to that, someone akin to Christina Hendricks, would never get a lead role like that. And at the same time given the same care to characterization.
View attachment 437114
Those women look like total twigs.
 
Somebody on /tv/ posted several comparison pictures, I was only able to grab one. This isn't the best of them, but it was comparing male and female big screen actors. Much of the time the girls don't show enough skin or have a wide shot to do a comparison photo so they grab papparazzi shots.

Since women are the best demographic to target (they are willing to try new things, are more likely to switch brands due to advertising, are potent social media influencers) that more and more movies are being retooled to their aesthetic. The men are the typical "power fantasy" types you see on the front of romance novels. And the women become more plain looking, more androgynous. To help the viewer identify with her. Think Bella, think Rey, think the new Lara Croft movie.

The theory going around is that women character that are too sexy to men(not the Jennifer Aniston sexy), are often distasteful as a character to women as they are percieved as competition. Whereas an attractive muscular male character is eye candy for the women, but something to aspire to for men.

I mean Hollywood is allowed to have a lead actor in a major film that is ripped to shreds like Hugh Jackman. But the male equivalent to that, someone akin to Christina Hendricks, would never get a lead role like that. And at the same time given the same care to characterization.
View attachment 437114
not thicc enough.
 
Back