- Joined
- May 2, 2018
so much time trying to "change people's minds"
That's your problem, and you don't even know it.
...I mean, I literally do know it, that was like 50% of the post. Maybe try an image board if text is too hard for you to follow?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so much time trying to "change people's minds"
That's your problem, and you don't even know it.
It's not even that interesting though, it's just you thinking you know shit about shit you don't know about or delusions. People only say the shit they do because someone was autistic enough to sit through your streams to see if it was true....I mean, I literally do know it, that was like 50% of the post. Maybe try an image board if text is too hard for you to follow?
What the fuck does this post even mean? I don't know shit about what I've said/done? Can you get your caretaker to hammer out a more concise comment for you?It's not even that interesting though, it's just you thinking you know shit about shit you don't know about or delusions. People only say the shit they do because someone was autistic enough to sit through your streams to see if it was true.
It means what it says, you fail reading comprehension or something?What the fuck does this post even mean? I don't know shit about what I've said/done? Can you get your caretaker to hammer out a more concise comment for you?
Saying something is "just politics" reeks of privilege.
People did this a lot for the kneeling NFL thing. "I don't want to deal with 'politics' on my game day, I just want to watch a Football game!" What's "politics" to one person might be a very real situation that another has to deal with on a daily basis. One person might say "y'know, all welfare is cancer, but that's just my political opinion," but another person might be coming up on their insurance being cancelled because of the ACA's collapse.
I really don't like the phrase "it's just politics," I'd rather go by individual beliefs.
So let's look at a couple:
If I have a friend who's a socialist, someone who's anti-capitalist, I can deal with being their friend. Our differences in belief are over economic systems. I don't know how many fundamental moral claims we'd differ on (insofar as treating people equally, respecting people's autonomy, etc...).
Let's say I have another friend who hops into boats in the ocean to turn back refugee ships that save people who are drowning when they attempt to cross the seas. These are irreconcilable differences. I could never see myself being friends with someone who differs from me so much on so many things that I consider "essential" to being a decent human being.
To brush off all of Lauren's bat-shit insane, borderline-nazi, "trad-con" views as just "politics" is so insanely disrespectful to people who are impacted in a very real and negative why by the types of rhetoric that Lauren supports.
June is also a spineless dumbfuck, but that's for another time.
...I mean, I literally do know it, that was like 50% of the post. Maybe try an image board if text is too hard for you to follow?
O yeah like that time blizzard had to buff your stupid strategy in starcraft 2 because only chinks won their tournaments, and even with an advantage you still failedI'll copy/paste the same reply I did to someone who actually DM'd me this question, if you're genuinely curious -
(part of this includes quotes from their post so you understand what I'm responding to)
>So why don't you do that in your thread? If you go low effort it just paints you worse than a bunch of internet forum loser people.
I've engaged with these types of people before. No one cares about what's true about anything, it's all about slandering a person you don't like for whatever reason. I have wasted so much time trying to "change people's minds" using fact vs fiction and I've learned over the past 1-2 years that it's a total waste of time. It's one of the huge reasons why I'd taken a step back from doing online debate stuff: people care about narratives, not anything remotely true.
>You've been really cagey about me and a few of the others saying the ethical CP stuff you've said is just as weird as the lolicon people, and you frame that as defending lolicon &/or being into it.
Because I'm literally in the thread as only a bad faith actor, I'm only there to get a rise out of people because it's funny to me. Do you honestly think if I spent an hour in that thread answering questions honestly it wouldn't just be a ton of people repeating the same, regurgitated bullshit before/after? Literally 90% of that thread's info about me is (easily) verifiably false. I've done long-form content debunking a ton of the shit that people spread about me and none of it even matters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egoyHzHn8Xk
(end response to that person)
tl;dr when I got into "internet debating" years ago I thought it'd be really fun to test arguments/philosophy against other people in order to root out the "truest" to reality argument. What ended up happening was people taking small clips of everything I've said out of context to construct these elaborate strawmen that have little to do with any of my actual beliefs, ie: unironically suggesting I am pro child-porn because of a 20 second clip taken from a 2 hour debate where I argue in the affirmative for age of consent laws against Amos Yee. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uw9NWF7Z6w
Also I don't feel the need to "prove my wit" here, I know I'm witty because I made a somewhat decent career online being witty. You can chalk it up to "internet dickriders" etc...or whatever you want, but where I succeeded literally hundreds of thousands of others fail. If you want, you can say that I'm not really funny at all, but then you'd have to admit that I grew my audience on the shoulders of my superior gameplay, and I don't think either of us want to defend that proposition.![]()
Considering he got incredibly defensive when we talked about his small dick...Did he say that 90% of the claims made in this thread are verifiably false?
I'm curious what the ten percent is.
If a shit post the are?