Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
...I mean, I literally do know it, that was like 50% of the post. Maybe try an image board if text is too hard for you to follow?
It's not even that interesting though, it's just you thinking you know shit about shit you don't know about or delusions. People only say the shit they do because someone was autistic enough to sit through your streams to see if it was true.
 
It's not even that interesting though, it's just you thinking you know shit about shit you don't know about or delusions. People only say the shit they do because someone was autistic enough to sit through your streams to see if it was true.
What the fuck does this post even mean? I don't know shit about what I've said/done? Can you get your caretaker to hammer out a more concise comment for you?
 
Saying something is "just politics" reeks of privilege.

People did this a lot for the kneeling NFL thing. "I don't want to deal with 'politics' on my game day, I just want to watch a Football game!" What's "politics" to one person might be a very real situation that another has to deal with on a daily basis. One person might say "y'know, all welfare is cancer, but that's just my political opinion," but another person might be coming up on their insurance being cancelled because of the ACA's collapse.

I really don't like the phrase "it's just politics," I'd rather go by individual beliefs.

So let's look at a couple:

If I have a friend who's a socialist, someone who's anti-capitalist, I can deal with being their friend. Our differences in belief are over economic systems. I don't know how many fundamental moral claims we'd differ on (insofar as treating people equally, respecting people's autonomy, etc...).

Let's say I have another friend who hops into boats in the ocean to turn back refugee ships that save people who are drowning when they attempt to cross the seas. These are irreconcilable differences. I could never see myself being friends with someone who differs from me so much on so many things that I consider "essential" to being a decent human being.

To brush off all of Lauren's bat-shit insane, borderline-nazi, "trad-con" views as just "politics" is so insanely disrespectful to people who are impacted in a very real and negative why by the types of rhetoric that Lauren supports.

June is also a spineless dumbfuck, but that's for another time.

Gay
 
...I mean, I literally do know it, that was like 50% of the post. Maybe try an image board if text is too hard for you to follow?

Again that is your problem. You think the shit you spew is going to change peoples minds? No great orator or thinker is 'there to change peoples minds'. They are there to present ideas in which people can make up their own minds.

I don't actually want to demean you, but it is like talking to a high school student. Really, take some debate courses and get rid of your arrogance.
 
I'll copy/paste the same reply I did to someone who actually DM'd me this question, if you're genuinely curious -

(part of this includes quotes from their post so you understand what I'm responding to)

>So why don't you do that in your thread? If you go low effort it just paints you worse than a bunch of internet forum loser people.

I've engaged with these types of people before. No one cares about what's true about anything, it's all about slandering a person you don't like for whatever reason. I have wasted so much time trying to "change people's minds" using fact vs fiction and I've learned over the past 1-2 years that it's a total waste of time. It's one of the huge reasons why I'd taken a step back from doing online debate stuff: people care about narratives, not anything remotely true.

>You've been really cagey about me and a few of the others saying the ethical CP stuff you've said is just as weird as the lolicon people, and you frame that as defending lolicon &/or being into it.

Because I'm literally in the thread as only a bad faith actor, I'm only there to get a rise out of people because it's funny to me. Do you honestly think if I spent an hour in that thread answering questions honestly it wouldn't just be a ton of people repeating the same, regurgitated bullshit before/after? Literally 90% of that thread's info about me is (easily) verifiably false. I've done long-form content debunking a ton of the shit that people spread about me and none of it even matters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egoyHzHn8Xk

(end response to that person)

tl;dr when I got into "internet debating" years ago I thought it'd be really fun to test arguments/philosophy against other people in order to root out the "truest" to reality argument. What ended up happening was people taking small clips of everything I've said out of context to construct these elaborate strawmen that have little to do with any of my actual beliefs, ie: unironically suggesting I am pro child-porn because of a 20 second clip taken from a 2 hour debate where I argue in the affirmative for age of consent laws against Amos Yee. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uw9NWF7Z6w

Also I don't feel the need to "prove my wit" here, I know I'm witty because I made a somewhat decent career online being witty. You can chalk it up to "internet dickriders" etc...or whatever you want, but where I succeeded literally hundreds of thousands of others fail. If you want, you can say that I'm not really funny at all, but then you'd have to admit that I grew my audience on the shoulders of my superior gameplay, and I don't think either of us want to defend that proposition. :)
O yeah like that time blizzard had to buff your stupid strategy in starcraft 2 because only chinks won their tournaments, and even with an advantage you still failed
Dont make me laught, you're a loser, now go back to sharing ethical cp with your cult members tiny
 
So... you epileptic? Because this:
ezgif-2-4c3388facc.gif


Looks almost exactly like a grand mal seizure. Just with less tongue biting and shitting of one's own pants. Also like half of the people in this thread have asked this question at least twice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lysol
Is there any debate where you honestly feel like you lost it? Because I honestly can't determine if any of your debates even yield any victory from either side. If it's by audience reaction, that's a bad way to measure the results since your opponents tend to not bring their supporters to watch your video, making the general audience reaction severely one-sided. I've been holding off on watching your video simply because it doesn't seem that constructive since it is so disorganized, so in your opinion what value do you think your videos provide in terms of debate?

Also, have you seen what a traditional debate - I'm talking about LD or Cross Examination format debates - is like? Is there any reason why you wouldn't plan out your debate videos like that? Especially since these formats tend to be very compact and constructive in its ability to generate discussion.

Lastly, can you clarify what your stance on deplatforming is? You honestly seem to go back and forth on the subject.
 
Your stuff is academically really sophomore and your 'debates' are effectively just running circles around some cretin because you have an assertive manner and it's hard to counter a gish gallop. unless they're smarter/better in discussion than you anticipated like Metakaur. Nothing is learnt and the dumb are made a little dumber by having their presumptions re-enforced.
In what context are you not just doing good old feel good bible revival shit for the dumber American liberals?
 
Last edited:
Back