Debate Robot Teapot On Whether 9/11 Was A Conspiracy

Who did 9/11?

  • Muslims

    Votes: 8 23.5%

  • The CIA

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Robot Teapot

    Votes: 25 73.5%

  • Some other group

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • Total voters
    34
Capsaicin Addict said:
Cite appropriate documentation proving this.
Click to expand...

I already posted the NIST report earlier in the thread. I direct you to the admission of at least 3.9 second freefall speed collapse that it took 8 years to pull out of them, despite their attempts to dance around this fact. Also, WTC7 wasn't even mentioned in their original 9/11 report.. they had to be pressed to fucking make a report on it.

Capsaicin Addict said:
Six floors of office fires, raging uncontrolled with the fire-sprinkler system offline. There's a reason why high-rise fires are fucking dangerous as hell.
Click to expand...

Fucking WOW. Are you aware that in the history of steel structured buildings consumed by fire (some almost completely on most floors), only 3 have EVER suffered complete collapse?

Yea dickhead, somehow they all happened on the same day in NY.

Capsaicin Addict said:
If it's basic physics you shouldn't have trouble laying out how freefall speed is an issue in this.

Alternately, you could go back to sobbing about jet fuel.
Click to expand...

Freefall speed is an issue because, in order for a building to collapse at freefall speed, this means that there is no physical material to slow the collapse, ie, a floor below a floor that is collapsing above it. This cannot happen with a natural collapse, the speed of descent would slow as floors hit floors below. It only plausibly happens during controlled demolition.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Panic Dance, A Cold Potato, RomanesEuntDomus and 4 others
CasualSeppuku said:
Absolutely, but mostly israeli. there's a video going around of netanyahu predicting it in 1995. 5 israelis were busted on staten island filming it and quietly deported. I'd like to know where the film is today.
Click to expand...
I found part of one,

DF346C5E-222F-4688-9D3D-3CF418DCDF80.jpeg
 
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: A Cold Potato, The Great Chandler, not william stenchever and 2 others
Bonk said:
where's the option in the poll where I can elect the Jews as the perps of 9/11
Click to expand...
Forget the Jews, it had to be those filthy Martians.

Robot Teapot said:
I already posted the NIST report earlier in the thread. I direct you to the admission of at least 3.9 second freefall speed collapse that it took 8 years to pull out of them, despite their attempts to dance around this fact. Also, WTC7 wasn't even mentioned in their original 9/11 report.. they had to be pressed to fucking make a report on it.
Click to expand...
My guess? Probably because they didn't think anyone would be exceptional enough to build conspiracy theories around a building getting hit by flaming debris launched from an adjacent building hit by an airplane.

Fucking WOW. Are you aware that in the history of steel structured buildings consumed by fire (some almost completely on most floors), only 3 have EVER suffered complete collapse?

Yea dickhead, somehow they all happened on the same day in NY.
Click to expand...
Well, except for references here, and here.

Freefall speed is an issue because, in order for a building to collapse at freefall speed, this means that there is no physical material to slow the collapse, ie, a floor below a floor that is collapsing above it. This cannot happen with a natural collapse, the speed of descent would slow as floors hit floors below. It only plausibly happens during controlled demolition.
Click to expand...
Based on who? Who is stating that it 'only plausibly happens during controlled demolition'? What the fuck, how do you think controlled demolitions WORK, you moron? You're deliberately inducing the 'pancaking' effect to bring the building straight down (as opposed to, say, sideways).

Here, let me help you: How controlled demolitions work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: A Hot Potato and RomanesEuntDomus
Capsaicin Addict said:
There's a lure to conspiracy theories, especially around things like disasters, mass deaths, etc. You want to make sense of it, and when someone offers some rational-seeming explanation, it's easy to latch onto.
Click to expand...
I think it's part of the human brain that wants to structure things and that refuses to admit that some things are just out of control.
The idea that a bunch of goatfucking imbeciles can hijack a plane on a whim and destroy a major building that stands -like barely any other- for the wealth and modernity of a nation like the WTC... that's just scary. People do not want to admit that their precious world can be torn up by literal nobodies, so they flee into a delusional world where some known entity like their own goverment or "the jews" or someone is running the show. Having a juggernaughtical kabal of conspirators working towards a fake attack is somehow easier to accept. And the MSM are obviously in on the whole deal, cause of course they are.

Ever noticed how one of the main evidences for government foul play is the false report on WTC7 collapsing when it was still standing?
That has to be the most baffling aspect of it all, since it's such an amazingly retarded idea.

Another interesting aspect is the way how these people talk, oftentimes like arrogant cultists, as seen here:

Robot Teapot said:
I'll say just this to my critics and doubters here (with hopefully a basic knowledge of physics) - Explain to me how a building can achieve freefall speed collapse without the aid of controlled demolition to create zero structural resistance?
Click to expand...
There seems to be a certain idea and perception leading to the self-image of being "enlightened by the truth that only a select few have discovered" and it always permeates the way these people talk. Then there's the attitude of "us against them", when Robot Teapot brought up NIST, he spoke like they begrudgingly and with gritted teeth admitted under their breath that such-and-such is the case, as if that was a long and hard-fought for overdue victory for conspiritards all around the globe when it was most likely just NIST going "Yeah, sure, whatever."

Robot Teapot said:
Even if a plane hits a building and it collapses as a result, you wouldn't see anything near freefall speed. WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane. There were some office fires. We are told that these office fires caused the collapse (lol).
Click to expand...
You could almost assume the building was collapsing or something. Well I never.
I especially like the jab at how WTC7 wasn't hit by a plane, something that's brought up a lot of times... seems kinda strange to overlook the minor detail that some of the biggest buildings on Earth collapsed right besides it.

Robot Teapot said:
This cannot happen with a natural collapse, the speed of descent would slow as floors hit floors below. It only plausibly happens during controlled demolition.
Click to expand...
Or, y'know, when the building collapses at the bottom first and not at the top.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: A Cold Potato, The Great Chandler and Capsaicin Addict
Reminder a good quarter of Tower 7's lower portion had been blasted into nothing by debris. It's no surprise it came down. Suggesting this was all some Zionist oil-grubber demolition job is an insult to everyone who died.

Truthers fucking disgust me.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: A Cold Potato and RomanesEuntDomus
So, I don't speak sped very well, do you think the little building was controlled demo, while the planes legit brought down the big towers?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back