"Jim" / James Augustine née James Patrick O'Shaughnessy / Mister Metokur / Jim81Jim / Internet Aristocrat - His autistic videos and the gay beta "sweetie squad" who mindlessly suck his cock.

Is James Augustine FUCKING DEAD?

  • Yes! Another Vtumour simp kicks the bucket.

    Votes: 230 35.9%
  • NO. Antis are just writing fan fiction 😭😭😭😭😭

    Votes: 410 64.1%

  • Total voters
    640
Why do people even use this exceptional "he's just an entertainer LMAO" argument? No one who's on the verge of crying because Baked Alaska moved to LA and didn't want to have alt-right kids fuck up his chatroom anymore just wants to be entertained, Jim pretty obviously has some ideological motive for going after people and making videos on certain subjects.

Really my main gripe with the guy at this point is that he's a hypocrite who talks out his ass a lot. He'll make fun of the concept of having internet friends but then hang out with Ethan Ralph, a fat manchild who got arrested twice for assaulting a cop (something he made fun of Lindsay Ellis for) 10 years ago every night on his livestream show no one watches. He'll make fun of the concept of fighting for a cause or whatever then passive aggressively bitch about gaming conventions being tolerant of trannies and video games having too much SJW shit in them. His entire internet persona is making fun of exceptional individuals who take dumb internet drama way too seriously but then he'll make a 4 part rant that's 2 hours long about some British faggot no one cares about. He'll respond to people on Twitter who talk shit about him but then ignore someone who has a much larger and more rabid audience then he does.

If he's going to put on this super shitposter act where he never takes anything seriously and makes fun of people for doing dumb shit then the least he could do is not fall into the same sort of archetype of people that he laughs at.

Yeah, I dislike the double standards he obviously has and his audience also holds him to also. A portion of them hold other content creators to autistic levels of scrutiny, yet seem to give Jim's content a free pass in terms of scrutiny.

The difference I think between Jim and a place like KF is that Jim is using laughing at lolcows as a means of self-validation and to make a career for himself, akin to a tabloid TV show host like Springer. Instead of covering cows and occasionally prodding them, he now gets into exceptional shit-flinging matches with them on social media.
 
He'll make fun of the concept of having internet friends but then hang out with Ethan Ralph
Lol, in this case we can call Tonka his internet friend, right?
something he made fun of Lindsay Ellis for
Because she is trying to look like someone completely different.
e'll make fun of the concept of fighting for a cause or whatever then passive aggressively bitch about gaming conventions being tolerant of trannies and video games having too much SJW shit in them.
Has he said in that video "we should ban trannies from GDC"? It was like his video about SCP, "well, this thing was fucked over by SJWs, RIP". He said more than once, that he likes disorder. And there was a time when he tried to fight for a cause and now he just doesn't see the point.
but then he'll make a 4 part rant that's 2 hours long about some British faggot no one cares about
Who? Kraut? Are you serious?
but then ignore someone who has a much larger and more rabid audience then he does.
Who, may I ask?
 
Getting a bit autistic in here, why are people trying to psychoanalyze why a shitposter is currently shitposting?
Not everything on the internet is motivated by some autistic crusade...

Jim stated that he likes the Jerry-Springer-style live discussions, that's what he got out of the Bloodsports.
That somehow ticked of the skeptics, so now we're basically seeing Bloodsports 2.0.
And so far, the skeptics have certainly delivered their fair share of entertainment.
Matt, Bunty, Sherratt, Vee, and now Sargon wants his turn, apparently.
 
Getting a bit autistic in here, why are people trying to psychoanalyze why a shitposter is currently shitposting?
Not everything on the internet is motivated by some autistic crusade...

Jim stated that he likes the Jerry-Springer-style live discussions, that's what he got out of the Bloodsports.
That somehow ticked of the skeptics, so now we're basically seeing Bloodsports 2.0.
And so far, the skeptics have certainly delivered their fair share of entertainment.
Matt, Bunty, Sherratt, Vee, and now Sargon wants his turn, apparently.
People are fans of things and people tend to superimpose their own views and opinions on that shit. At least thats what I think it is. I just like most of jim's content, I don't expect anything from him except some entertainment once in a while.
 
So I think some people see how successful Jim has been doing in recent and want to take him down a peg.

Anyone who wants to do that is a lolcow. I just want to laugh at tards.

Sometimes Jim brings that, sometimes not. It's always been that way, though. So I just watch what I think is funny and don't watch what I don't. By and large, I find streams boring and shambolic, but funny stuff like the boulder guy getting wrecked come out of them sometimes.
 
If I have pet targets or whatever, I find info on them myself, just like we did on every cow/community thread.

I wasn't specifically speaking about you, but ok.

And I am open to watching Jim videos that are well-researched and put together (I still have the "bell" turned on for his channel btw, I still have hope). I just don't make excuses for bad content, that's how we still have DSP or Spoony fanboys (extreme example I know, but one that kinda rings true).

Not to be a dick but "bad content" is entirely based on your own perspective, and it's a bit disingenuous to keep acting as if though your opinion is factual. For example - I haven't considered his quality dropping at all, personally, but that is probably because I'm interested in the topics he's been covering lately.

Why do people even use this exceptional "he's just an entertainer LMAO" argument? No one who's on the verge of crying because Baked Alaska moved to LA and didn't want to have alt-right kids fuck up his chatroom anymore just wants to be entertained, Jim pretty obviously has some ideological motive for going after people and making videos on certain subjects.

Yeah, his ideological motive is that he finds the people he "goes after" entertaining. It really, really sounds like you're pissed that he isn't doing videos on people that you dislike.

Really my main gripe with the guy at this point is that he's a hypocrite who talks out his ass a lot. He'll make fun of the concept of having internet friends but then hang out with Ethan Ralph, a fat manchild who got arrested twice for assaulting a cop (something he made fun of Lindsay Ellis for) 10 years ago every night on his livestream show no one watches. He'll make fun of the concept of fighting for a cause or whatever then passive aggressively bitch about gaming conventions being tolerant of trannies and video games having too much SJW shit in them. His entire internet persona is making fun of exceptional individuals who take dumb internet drama way too seriously but then he'll make a 4 part rant that's 2 hours long about some British faggot no one cares about. He'll respond to people on Twitter who talk shit about him but then ignore someone who has a much larger and more rabid audience then he does.

A) It doesn't take that much time at all out of the day to hop on a stream, and if it's a stream the guy enjoys why wouldn't he want to take part in it? It doesn't make him Ralph's internet friend any more than it made Tonka, Failure, or Warski his internet friend.

B) Saying "x people ruined y thing" isn't an ideological statement. Unless you're seriously going to make the argument that SJWs made GDQ a better entertainment experience.

C) He literally gets paid to make videos about internet personalities, and he typically does them on people he thinks would be entertaining subjects. As far as Kraut being "some British faggot no one cares about", you could say similar things about Terry A Davis, Nick Bate, etc. being "some (insert here) faggot no one cares about".

D) It takes what, one, two minutes to type out a tweet?

If he's going to put on this super shitposter act where he never takes anything seriously and makes fun of people for doing dumb shit then the least he could do is not fall into the same sort of archetype of people that he laughs at.

The last time he took something seriously was GamerGate, and look at what it turned into. I don't blame the guy for not wanting to hitch himself to any ideological wagons now or in future after that.
 
Getting a bit autistic in here, why are people trying to psychoanalyze why a shitposter is currently shitposting?
Not everything on the internet is motivated by some autistic crusade...

See, this is what I was talking about earlier. Just shrugging and saying "That's our Jim!" on a forum that laughs at all manners of people on the internet is just hypocritical. There shouldn't be sacred cows (no pun intended) that are somehow above the same levels of scrutiny applied to others here.

No-one is saying he's the next CWC, but we should be at least consistent with our critique.
 
The last time he took something seriously was GamerGate, and look at what it turned into. I don't blame the guy for not wanting to hitch himself to any ideological wagons now or in future after that.


You know, I wish he'd get into activism and politics again, just for the sake of proving himself to be more competent and successful at that than Sargon (though that threshhold isn't very high). Can you imagine how butthurt little Carl of Swindon would get?

And he could probably do it without much of an effort.
Start a boycott campaign against companies that stand to profit from the expropriation of white farmers, set up a livestream with Lauren Southern to promote it, and have his audience go after these companies on social media, promoting their competitors on every single discussion. He has the numbers and dedicated audience to make that happen.

Something like that would easily have a greater impact than anything Sargon ever did in the realm of politics.
 
See, this is what I was talking about earlier. Just shrugging and saying "That's our Jim!" on a forum that laughs at all manners of people on the internet is just hypocritical. There shouldn't be sacred cows (no pun intended) that are somehow above the same levels of scrutiny applied to others here.

No-one is saying he's the next CWC, but we should be at least consistent with our critique.

I don't know about anyone else, but I don't really get how exactly he's acting like a cow. I just like the stuff he's doing at the moment because it's making a lot of people lose their spaghetti that wouldn't otherwise, including a few people in this thread.

You know, I wish he'd get into activism and politics again, just for the sake of proving himself to be more competent and successful at that than Sargon (though that threshhold isn't very high). Can you imagine how butthurt little Carl of Swindon would get?

And he could probably do it without much of an effort.
Start a boycott campaign against companies that stand to profit from the expropriation of white farmers, set up a livestream with Lauren Southern to promote it, and have his audience go after these companies on social media, promoting their competitors on every single discussion. He has the numbers and dedicated audience to make that happen.

Something like that would easily have a greater impact than anything Sargon ever did in the realm of politics.

I'd love for him to do that if only for how absolutely incensed a shitload of people would get. It'd be even better if he did all that shit, then a month later started bashing Trump just to get the high score in number of people pissed off on the internet at a single person.
 
See, this is what I was talking about earlier. Just shrugging and saying "That's our Jim!" on a forum that laughs at all manners of people on the internet is just hypocritical. There shouldn't be sacred cows (no pun intended) that are somehow above the same levels of scrutiny applied to others here.

Well, allow me to retort.
How often do you see people questioning someone's motivation out of sheer curiosity, and not because they disapprove of that person's actions?
When people say "you're just doing that because of [insert hidden motive]", they usually mean "I don't like it, stop doing that".

I've seen these arguments before:

"You can do better"
"You're just jealous"
"You're just trollshielding for Ralph/ the alt right"

and now

"Oh my god, Jim is such a lolcow for doing that!"

Jim has been inquired multiple times on stream why he's doing things the way he's doing them. He's given an explanation, one you can choose to believe or not.
When people keep harping on about it, that raises the question who's trollshielding whom, don't you think?

(Edit: Quoted the wrong post.)
 
Last edited:
Gotta say, it seems like CRP saying that Jim is losing his touch got to him. Usually Jim would shrug it off and say "that's your opinion, okay" but he immediately started flexing view counts and talk shit. Seems strange.
This was coming from a guy, who couldn't recall what were Jim's last videos about and who called making videos for YT "art".
You know, I wish he'd get into activism and politics again
He's talked about this. He has too much of a compromising background to do that. "And where do I go? Alt-right? I'm fucking asian chick."
 
I don't know about anyone else, but I don't really get how exactly he's acting like a cow. I just like the stuff he's doing at the moment because it's making a lot of people lose their spaghetti that wouldn't otherwise, including a few people in this thread.

Can't speak for the people who are getting salty here, but there's a good combination of criticisms here, such as his generally accepted decline in content and its esoteric focus that normies wouldn't give two shits about, letting people get under his skin easier (fuck, CRP managed to rile him up of all people), being a part of the drama instead of observing and laughing at it, having a clear agenda as to who he goes after (who gives a shit about Bunty King, as @neural said), associating with lolcows such as Ethan Ralph and an IRL by all accounts riddled with substance abuse.

I might be missing stuff here.
 
such as his generally accepted decline in content
I don't see people storming his Twitter, Patreon or YT comments, saying "Make good videos again, Jim".
letting people get under his skin easier (fuck, CRP managed to rile him up of all people)
Add this to
"You can do better"
"You're just jealous"
"You're just trollshielding for Ralph/ the alt right"
being a part of the drama instead of observing and laughing at it
I don't remember that people were so mad when he'd done it with Ross, diaperfags and others. He was part of a drama, he observed it and made video about it.
having a clear agenda as to who he goes after
Oh, again with "why don't you make a video about X"?
who gives a shit about Bunty King
And who gave a shit about Ross, Terry or others?
associating with lolcows such as Ethan Ralph
So you say that everyone who were on stream with Ralph are lolcows?
 
Can't speak for the people who are getting salty here, but there's a good combination of criticisms here, such as his generally accepted decline in content and its esoteric focus that normies wouldn't give two shits about, letting people get under his skin easier (fuck, CRP managed to rile him up of all people), being a part of the drama instead of observing and laughing at it, having a clear agenda as to who he goes after (who gives a shit about Bunty King, as @neural said), associating with lolcows such as Ethan Ralph and an IRL by all accounts riddled with substance abuse.

I might be missing stuff here.
I thought the Bunty king stuff was hilarious really. Can you explain about his clear agenda?
 
Back