Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

[StarkRavingMad]

lol Shoe and Skeptic ARE the Skeptic community right now.

They're just more "clique-y" about it.

 

[Burning Fanatic]

lol Shoe and Skeptic ARE the Skeptic community right now.

They're just more "clique-y" about it.

Yeah, again Jim brought this up again during this stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ0vYWKVsQU
1:50:30

He really does think June and Greg are outside all of this, cause Shoe's channel is sitting pretty at 1 mil subs. Wish somebody could actually disagree with him on that, but I'm unsure who would even bother.

 

[Kaufmanesque]

Wish somebody could actually disagree with him on that, but I'm unsure who would even bother.

Ralph Retort is probably the only one who'd really press the issue, but it's Ralph, so it'd probably come off in the most retarded, ineloquent manner possible

 

[Not even once]

Yeah, again Jim brought this up again during this stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ0vYWKVsQU
1:50:30

He really does think June and Greg are outside all of this, cause Shoe's channel is sitting pretty at 1 mil subs. Wish somebody could actually disagree with him on that, but I'm unsure who would even bother.

'Video was taken down by user' - anyone know why that might be?

 

[Dr. Henry Armitage]

Greg called a bunch of the skeptics into a skype group and told told them that something to the effect of "there's a pecking order (within the community that totally doesn't exist) and I'm at the top"

Being at the top of the skeptic community is like being the smartest person with down syndrome.

 

[StarkRavingMad]

Hey, that's offensive to Down Syndrome people.

There are many people with Down Syndrome who have REAL jobs, after all.

 

[Dr. Henry Armitage]

Hey, that's offensive to Down Syndrome people.

There are many people with Down Syndrome who have REAL jobs, after all.

You are absolutely right. I've never seen a person with down syndrome panhandling. But I've never seen a skepticᵀᴹ not panhandling.

 

[LtCucumber]

Hey, that's offensive to Down Syndrome people.

There are many people with Down Syndrome who have REAL jobs, after all.

Don't forget some of them also have actual lives, and partners they live with...

 

[Brother Rabbit]

So I'm not sure if this fits here, if someone wants me to remove this post let me know, but I thought it was interesting.

Recently, Blair White has changed her content from political commentary to vlogs and I guess what you'd call "normie" content due to 2 reasons, reason one being she's been harassed, her family has been harassed, she's been doxed ect.

Reason 2 is that people that is considered her "peers" in the political commentary community don't actually believe what they say on their videos and that they're faking their beliefs. She doesn't name names, but says that "They're not obscure, you guys know them."

I haven't looked into her and shoe's relationship much, would shoe be apart of the group of people she's talking about? Shoe has shown to change her story a few times (like in her old videos where she talks about giving a guy a blowjob in high school compared to now where she never had sex in high school let alone had a relationship)

 

[Silence of the Troons]

So I'm not sure if this fits here, if someone wants me to remove this post let me know, but I thought it was interesting.

Recently, Blair White has changed her content from political commentary to vlogs and I guess what you'd call "normie" content due to 2 reasons, reason one being she's been harassed, her family has been harassed, she's been doxed ect.

Reason 2 is that people that is considered her "peers" in the political commentary community don't actually believe what they say on their videos and that they're faking their beliefs. She doesn't name names, but says that "They're not obscure, you guys know them."

I haven't looked into her and shoe's relationship much, would shoe be apart of the group of people she's talking about? Shoe has shown to change her story a few times (like in her old videos where she talks about giving a guy a blowjob in high school compared to now where she never had sex in high school let alone had a relationship)

They still appear to be quite chummy
https://twitter.com/search?l=&q=from:shoe0nhead to:msblairewhite&src=typd

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q=from:msblairewhite to:shoe0nhead&src=typd

Maybe Blaire is secretly planning to discard her though. Who knows?

 

[Spooky]

So I'm not sure if this fits here, if someone wants me to remove this post let me know, but I thought it was interesting.

Recently, Blair White has changed her content from political commentary to vlogs and I guess what you'd call "normie" content due to 2 reasons, reason one being she's been harassed, her family has been harassed, she's been doxed ect.

Reason 2 is that people that is considered her "peers" in the political commentary community don't actually believe what they say on their videos and that they're faking their beliefs. She doesn't name names, but says that "They're not obscure, you guys know them."

I haven't looked into her and shoe's relationship much, would shoe be apart of the group of people she's talking about? Shoe has shown to change her story a few times (like in her old videos where she talks about giving a guy a blowjob in high school compared to now where she never had sex in high school let alone had a relationship)

I think Blair was mostly talking about conservatives there because he started rambling about trans stuff, but can't be 100% sure. I guess it could apply to anti sjw types too. Either way I don't think this was directed at Gregory and June.

 

[StarkRavingMad]

Nah, Blaire and Shoe are in a clique together. No way is she parting ways from her.

Honestly, I had no issues with Blaire until that recent video. Comes across as very sketchy. I don't blame her for wanting to take a break (or leave completely) from political commentary ... But it's strange to "expose" people without naming anybody. In an instagram live video, she was saying stuff like how some of these conservatives "plant" protesters. That is one serious fucking claim without providing evidence. How am I supposed to take her word seriously? And remember when some people were saying how Blaire faked that video where someone tossed a drink in her face for wearing a MAGA hat? Maybe she DID fake it all along? I'm questioning the authenticity of everything she's done now.

I don't know. I see red flags after that video. It stinks to high heaven.

And, you know, it's funny how Blaire is choosing to dump the conservatives after she has effectively utilized them for her social climbing. She "left politics" because there was no more money to gain from it after moving to L.A. Now she's making normie videos and aiming to do more collabs with big YouTubers. Again, it's fine to move on from politics (especially since anti-SJW content is a dead horse at this point) ... But it's very two-faced and fake to "dump" the previous people that gave her a platform in the first place. Fuck off, Blaire

EDIT: and the whole reference to "Trans people being the butt of all jokes." Yeah, she must be throwing Crowder under the bus. I see nothing fake about Crowder's sketches about trans people. He IS appealing to an audience with his sketch comedy (whether that comedy is funny or not is entirely subjective). Literally every single time he's had a trans person on his show to have a serious discussion, though, he's been nothing but respectful.

Sketch comedy =/= serious political commentary. Blaire has said many things about people than can be interpreted as "mean." For someone who dishes it out all of the time, she SURE can't take it.

 

[fireatdawn]

Quite a few people think the reason why Jim won't make a video on Shoe&Skeptic, despite there being ample stuff on them, is because they 1) have something on him, or 2) he's afraid of their YouTube connections, which we know for a fact they have, thanks to vee letting it slip.

 

[wylfım]

It's scary to think of the amount of influence they have. For someone that makes low-quality hanging-fruit "political" humor videos, shoe can quite likely call on her army to attack anyone of moderate standing or lower. Given her tendency to go on rage-delete twitter rampages without really thinking her actions through, and her general dislike of anyone that criticizes her...

 

[Sweet Musica]

Yeah, again Jim brought this up again during this stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQ0vYWKVsQU
1:50:30

He really does think June and Greg are outside all of this, cause Shoe's channel is sitting pretty at 1 mil subs. Wish somebody could actually disagree with him on that, but I'm unsure who would even bother.

Thing is, at least with Shoe, is that there are people who actually watch their content and like their personalities. The same people who were completely forgiving when it came to the candid scandal. Compare them to Mundane Matt and they came through unscathed.

 

[Kaufmanesque]

Quite a few people think the reason why Jim won't make a video on Shoe&Skeptic, despite there being ample stuff on them, is because they 1) have something on him, or 2) he's afraid of their YouTube connections, which we know for a fact they have, thanks to vee letting it slip.

I missed this one - what did Vee say about Shoe's/Skeptic's connections?

 

[Silence of the Troons]

Today's Sargon-Metokur drama was quite fun to follow. I was hoping for Shuwu to tweet about it, but sadly, she either doesn't appear to be interested in commenting on it or is completely unaware of it. She did post something else yesterday though, and while it was hypocritical given her own "red pill pandering", the statement she made was actually quite reasonable!

https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/status/1041221371211259904

Now, let's listen to some of the things her lovely fanbase has to say (compilation from https://lolcow.farm/snow/res/663457.html#689346):

I wonder how many of these neckbeards will be there to defend and support her when Greg leaves her for another woman?

 

[cactus]

Today's Sargon-Metokur drama was quite fun to follow. I was hoping for Shuwu to tweet about it, but sadly, she either doesn't appear to be interested in commenting on it or is completely unaware of it. She did post something else yesterday though, and while it was hypocritical given her own "red pill pandering", the statement she made was actually quite reasonable!

https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/status/1041221371211259904
View attachment 542579Now, let's listen to some of the things her lovely fanbase has to say (compilation from https://lolcow.farm/snow/res/663457.html#689346):
View attachment 542585I wonder how many of these neckbeards will be there to defend and support her when Greg leaves her for another woman?

I love the guy telling the only girl in those comments "You don't know anything, all guys go through this!" when I doubt that guy has ever gone out on a date.

 

[wylfım]

>support each other and build each other up
>DADDY WILL YOU LET ME SUCK YOU DRY IF IM A GOOD LITTLE SLAVE TODAY

The cognitive dissonance is reaching astronomical levels. BDSM by definition entails an imbalance in power, and keeping it that way. It's a humiliation fetish. There is no "building each other up," especially if its a / l i f e s t y l e / as June loves to so often remind us.

 

[cactus]

>support each other and build each other up
>DADDY WILL YOU LET ME SUCK YOU DRY IF IM A GOOD LITTLE SLAVE TODAY

The cognitive dissonance is reaching astronomical levels. BDSM by definition entails an imbalance in power, and keeping it that way. It's a humiliation fetish. There is no "building each other up," especially if its a / l i f e s t y l e / as June loves to so often remind us.

I wonder if Greg and June even practice after care? Because it doesn't seem like it. BDSM scenes can be emotionally intense and the whole point of after care is to make sure the sub/slave is fine mentally, emotionally, and physically.